Would you accept the 62 overall pick for Willis McGahee?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Buffalo Bills Discussion
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW...lo/default.htm
Following on the heels of some uncomplimentary comments about Buffalo in an interview in the current issue of Penthouse magazine, and the news that McGahee has fathered three children with three different women in the past two years, it appears as if RB Willis McGahee has further alienated a Bills brain trust that places a big emphasis on high character and morals. Add in the fact that agent Drew Rosenhaus has mentioned the desire to extend McGahees deal, which expires following the 2007 season, and word is the Bills are going to make addressing their RB situation a top priority this offseason. We hear the Bills are not likely to shop McGahee but that they would consider a trade offer if it were proposed to them. To give up McGahee, Buffalo would expect a first-round pick plus one of the following: a player, a late-round draft pick this year or a future draft pick.
Doesn't look like the 62nd overall pick would do it for Levy.
Thatta boy Levy. Aiming high.
Comment
-
Originally posted by art vandelayWow, alot of Bills joining as of late. For a while, it was just Rob S, SuperMcGee, me, Geo, iamcanadian and metaphor.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DWhitner20Anyone else a bit dissapointed when Leon Hall goes to us in mocks?
I think it would be very good , competive chemistry to put a Michigan guy in the same secondary as our Ohio St guys.
Comment
-
Leon Hall would be nice as would Brown, but we would need to trade down for Brown. I've seen him play here at PSU, however he isn't worth a 12 overall pick. I mean he's a great Tackle, but I like Pennington as he is of the same mold as Brown - big body, can really road grade.
I'd be more happy to see us trade down with a team like the Titans (enables them to snag Jarrett) and us someone like Blaylock for example.Jets, Mets, Knicks, and the U's too cool for uze
Sig by, Hitman D
Comment
-
Round 1
The best way we can help our linebackers is to get a dominant DT. If Marv thinks a DT at pick 12 is that good, then that is our man.
If Marv likes a RB to take on Day 1 and wants to cut McGahee loose, then I'm in favor of that.
If a top CB is there, then I'd go there next, regardless of what happens with Clements. I like to be deep in the secondary.
Round 2
RB, CB, or WR.
Round 3
RB, CB, WR, LB, DT
Round 4
LB, TE, DT
Late Rounds
I don't like taking an o linemen before round 5. I like drafting o linemen in bulk. Rather than take one in the 2nd round, take 3 of them in rounds 5, 6, and 7. This is what Marv did last year. Maybe take a LB for Special Teams on day 2 or take a flyer on a WR or TE.
I would not draft a QB, P, K, S, or DE at all.
Comment
-
No offense but your theory on offensive lineman is skewed. I mean I understand where you are coming from, however we really need a dominant Guard (two even) to make our running game successful as well as the passing game. To put it off that late, is seemingly not addressing the issue. And I don't find DT to be our Number one priority. We can get a guy via FA that can fill in and make an impact too, with McCargo, Williams, Tripplett, FA I think we have a good rotation, not to mention with Hargrove coming in on obvious passing downs (please let us re-sign him).
I see CB or LB as our first round pick, with a Guard in the second and we take a shot on a RB in the third (Michael Bush if he lasts, Antonio Pittman, Tony Hunt, Darius Walker, etc).Jets, Mets, Knicks, and the U's too cool for uze
Sig by, Hitman D
Comment
-
Originally posted by SalamiIf a top CB is there, then I'd go there next, regardless of what happens with Clements. I like to be deep in the secondary.
Comment
Comment