Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trading Burgess to the Pats?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Trading Burgess to the Pats?

    http://www.bostonherald.com/blogs/sp...lands-burgess/

    Getting a second rounder should be a no brainer.

    Third rounder i would probably hesitate but it seems like he wouldn't re-sign after his contract is over anyways.
    Peyton Manning Fanboy
    Originally posted by Complex
    They said I couldn't be a high school QB. They said I couldn't get a D1 scholarship. BeerBaron said I couldn't beat the Bears. - Tebow

    Proving the doubters wrong.

  • #2
    Hmm, interesting. I wonder if this falls through for a 2nd.
    my scent?...like making love to a lumberjack
    <TACKLE> i will ngata give you a bj raji
    <+BOE> Scott, with Burfict's character concerns (whether legit or not) you think Pioli would draft him. :D
    <+ScottWright> Why not. Baldwin does need a sparring partner...
    Originally posted by Hermstheman83
    What's with the hate on Ricky Stanzi? Those youtube clips of him with the hulk hogan theme music instantly make him better than Luck.

    Comment


    • #3
      I dont see why you wouldnt take a 3rd. You guys arent a win now team so take the pick.

      Comment


      • #4
        I'd take a third rounder if it came to that, this has lingered for years so it's time to move on. Good opportunity for our young pass rushers to contribute, although I'd expect a collective effort in replacing his production. We saw what some of them could do for a good portion of last season when Burgess was out.

        The team has probably been preparing for his departure for some time now, ideally I'd want Trevor Scott stepping in on a more full-time basis, but I'm not sure he has the necessary bulk to take over that role at this point in his career.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by 619 View Post
          I'd take a third rounder if it came to that, this has lingered for years so it's time to move on. Good opportunity for our young pass rushers to contribute, although I'd expect a collective effort in replacing his production. We saw what some of them could do for a good portion of last season when Burgess was out.

          The team has probably been preparing for his departure for some time now, ideally I'd want Trevor Scott stepping in on a more full-time basis, but I'm not sure he has the necessary bulk to take over that role at this point in his career.
          I wouldn't want Scott in there right now either. Like you said, the problem we have without Burgess is that most of the other DE's lack bulk (Scott, Sulak, Norris). Only Richardson and Shaughnessy (unproven rookie) look like guys who could play the first 2 downs. Richardson - Kelly - Warren - Shaughnessy = awful D-line lol. If we are going to trade Burgess, I don't know why we waited until now, should have done it before the draft.

          Comment


          • #6
            The notion that anyone, especially a well run team like the Pats, would give up a 2nd or 3rd round pick for Burgess is absolutely comical.

            If anyone offers anything, Oakland should jump all over it.
            My sig pic has now come full circle. Lucky me.

            No offense, but your Raiders draft sucks.

            Comment

            Working...
            X

            Debug Information