Draft Countdown Forums

Draft Countdown Forums (http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/index.php)
-   Off Topic (http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=46)
-   -   Funny Pictures Thread (http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10777)

MichaelJordanEberle (sabf) 01-27-2011 03:46 PM



The most epic of epic face palms.

MichaelJordanEberle (sabf) 01-27-2011 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yourfavestoner (Post 2497630)
What Our Pets Dream about:














I loved both the octopus and the vacuums. I think I'd have given the octopus the nod, but I'm not sure because the vacuum one is so epic.

yourfavestoner 01-27-2011 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MichaelJordanEberle (sabf) (Post 2497991)


The most epic of epic face palms.

Eh, the question isn't whether or not there's global warming, it's about whether or not it's caused by man. And IMO, we have a negligible effect - at best.

njx9 01-27-2011 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yourfavestoner (Post 2498011)
Eh, the question isn't whether or not there's global warming, it's about whether or not it's caused by man. And IMO, we have a negligible effect - at best.

hooray for political conversations that, sadly and bizarrely, having nothing to actually do with politics. you know your system has been co-opted when...

MichaelJordanEberle (sabf) 01-27-2011 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yourfavestoner (Post 2498011)
Eh, the question isn't whether or not there's global warming, it's about whether or not it's caused by man. And IMO, we have a negligible effect - at best.

More than anything, I was shocked at the simple retardation involved in saying "It's cold outside, so where's the global warming?" I guess it's kinda the fault of climate change proponents for calling it global warming instead of climate change. Climate change is more about extreme weather patterns in both the summer and the winter, and that just isn't deniable. I'm not too well read on the issues, so I don't know how much is caused by man or not. But I do know the "It's cold, so no global warming" thing is the dumbest thing I've heard all day, and that's saying something because in a class discussion this morning one guy cited a movie as an example for his point.

Crickett 01-27-2011 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MichaelJordanEberle (sabf) (Post 2497991)


The most epic of epic face palms.



But but but but but.....


It's cold outside.
Cardon Dioxide is plant food.
In the 70's, everyone said there would be global cooling.
There were sceintist hocked emails staying their is no such thing.
Its all a constiparacy.

GLOBAL WARMING DOESNT EXIST!!!! LALALALALALA I CANT HEAR YOU!!!!!!


This is a joke. Especially the spelling and grammatical errors.

eaglesalltheway 01-27-2011 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by njx9 (Post 2498023)
hooray for political conversations that, sadly and bizarrely, having nothing to actually do with politics. you know your system has been co-opted when...

Is this the clue to get off the global warming subject? Because I have something to say that I found out recently through my ventures into the meteorology that is actually pretty interesting. If you want it left alone though, don't worry I'll keep it to myself. It doesn't really "take sides" in the argument, its just more infromation to consider on the subject.

eaglesalltheway 01-27-2011 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MichaelJordanEberle (sabf) (Post 2498029)
More than anything, I was shocked at the simple retardation involved in saying "It's cold outside, so where's the global warming?" I guess it's kinda the fault of climate change proponents for calling it global warming instead of climate change. Climate change is more about extreme weather patterns in both the summer and the winter, and that just isn't deniable. I'm not too well read on the issues, so I don't know how much is caused by man or not. But I do know the "It's cold, so no global warming" thing is the dumbest thing I've heard all day, and that's saying something because in a class discussion this morning one guy cited a movie as an example for his point.

Well I guess its OK (at least I hope), if not I'm sure njx will make this disappear...

You aren't off at all in you're basic idea of the climate change. Basically "global warming" does mean more severe contrasts to the lows and highs. That goes for temperature and precipitation.

But the information I'm talking about in a last post was a bit of information an Accuweather meteorolgist brought up in one of his videos showing how solar flares coinciding with man's industrial buildup have been historically more intense (these flares last for years) during the time when man has supposedly started changing the atmosphere. But the most recent solar flare was much less intense than predicted, and the next few solar flares are expected to continue that trend, and he believes that by 2030, the Earth will be cooling, and in an extreme circumstance, we could see a "mini ice age" by 2050. There really is now way to figure out which side is right in laying the blame on humans or the sun right now, but by then we should now that if the Earth is still warming, humans have had an effect. If not, we know that humans, indeed, pale in comparison to the power of the Sun.

yourfavestoner 01-27-2011 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by njx9 (Post 2498023)
hooray for political conversations that, sadly and bizarrely, having nothing to actually do with politics. you know your system has been co-opted when...

It's sad, because it's absolutely about science and not politics. But it will devolve into a political discussion because politicians use it as a hot button issue without knowing what the **** they're talking about.

Sorry for killing the /b/ thread again guys.

BeerBaron 01-27-2011 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yourfavestoner (Post 2498059)
Sorry for killing the /b/ thread again guys.



Only this time:


eaglesalltheway 01-27-2011 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yourfavestoner (Post 2498059)
It's sad, because it's absolutely about science and not politics. But it will devolve into a political discussion because politicians use it as a hot button issue without knowing what the **** they're talking about.

Sorry for killing the /b/ thread again guys.

Its OK, I at least contributed to it...

Consider this my additional apology.

Bosanac01 01-27-2011 04:18 PM

words, refresh page, more words, fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

MichaelJordanEberle (sabf) 01-27-2011 04:19 PM

Oh and totes did not mean to start debate. I probly should have only posted the top half, which is where the idiocy was. But alas, I am nothing if not lazy.



eaglesalltheway 01-27-2011 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MichaelJordanEberle (sabf) (Post 2498073)
Oh and totes did not mean to start debate. I probly should have only posted the top half, which is where the idiocy was. But alas, I am nothing if not lazy.



At least we kept it scientific and didn't delve into the dark alley... so to speak.

Crickett 01-27-2011 04:27 PM



The Polar Express. It's just like Saw.

GB12 01-27-2011 04:43 PM

Maybe because they're both crappy movies?

Bengals78 01-27-2011 04:51 PM


steelersfan43 01-27-2011 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eaglesalltheway (Post 2498057)
Well I guess its OK (at least I hope), if not I'm sure njx will make this disappear...

You aren't off at all in you're basic idea of the climate change. Basically "global warming" does mean more severe contrasts to the lows and highs. That goes for temperature and precipitation.

But the information I'm talking about in a last post was a bit of information an Accuweather meteorolgist brought up in one of his videos showing how solar flares coinciding with man's industrial buildup have been historically more intense (these flares last for years) during the time when man has supposedly started changing the atmosphere. But the most recent solar flare was much less intense than predicted, and the next few solar flares are expected to continue that trend, and he believes that by 2030, the Earth will be cooling, and in an extreme circumstance, we could see a "mini ice age" by 2050. There really is now way to figure out which side is right in laying the blame on humans or the sun right now, but by then we should now that if the Earth is still warming, humans have had an effect. If not, we know that humans, indeed, pale in comparison to the power of the Sun.

99% of the scientists are on one side with fox news on the other...

BeerBaron 01-27-2011 05:50 PM


yourfavestoner 01-27-2011 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steelersfan43 (Post 2498273)
99% of the scientists are on one side with fox news on the other...

This just simply isn't true. The scientific community is incredibly divided on the topic.

And so I don't get killed:

ElectricEye 01-27-2011 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steelersfan43 (Post 2498273)
99% of the scientists are on one side with fox news on the other...


njx9 01-27-2011 06:17 PM

come on y'all. it's simply not possible to have a civil conversation about it on an internet message board with more than 2 members. let's not kill the funny picture thread anymore than i've already tried to by never actually posting a picture in it.

draftguru151 01-27-2011 06:21 PM


brat316 01-27-2011 06:21 PM

yeah seriously njx hippster hear already ruined the name of this thread.

brat316 01-27-2011 06:22 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.