Draft Countdown Forums

Draft Countdown Forums (http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/index.php)
-   Pro Football (http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=44)
-   -   Best bet to go 0-16 next year? (http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/showthread.php?t=28273)

HellonEarth84 12-29-2008 03:11 AM

Best bet to go 0-16 next year?
 
My pick is the St Louis Rams.

I think they trade Holt and get a 2nd rounder. Atogwe signs with another team. Stephen Jackson has a season ending injury. They could do it, depending on how tough their schedule is.

bearsfan_51 12-29-2008 03:13 AM

Nobody. It's probably not going to happen for another 30-40 years.

HellonEarth84 12-29-2008 03:18 AM

You're probably right. But considering that it almost happened TWO years in a row now (Miami last year), it's possible that it could happen. We'll have to wait and see how their FA signings go and what their schedules are like. It's definitely possible though.

Strongside 12-29-2008 03:25 AM

The Rams play the AFC south and the NFC north, the Saints and the Redskins, plus their divisional games.

A fairly tough schedule, but 0-16 is something special and won't happen again for a long time.

Gay Ork Wang 12-29-2008 03:41 AM

the NFC West is never a tough schedule

OzTitan 12-29-2008 03:53 AM

The Lions.

Gay Ork Wang 12-29-2008 04:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzTitan (Post 1392288)
The Lions.

we play the NFC West, so no way, but games like Lions vs Rams are going to be epic ****

MetSox17 12-29-2008 04:13 AM

I don't think anyone goes near 0-16 next year. The Lions will be improved (they have no where to go, but up) and i think they can squeeze a game or two.

TonyGfortheTD 12-29-2008 05:18 AM

The Chiefs, if they keep Herm for another year. He has no clue how to coach and they face the NFC East and the AFC North along with Buffalo and Jacksonville. No wait, we play Oakland and Denver twice a year.

umphrey 12-29-2008 05:25 AM

The Raiders. After getting sick of Al Davis' antics, they consider a strike, but realize they wouldn't like to lose out on the millions of dollars they are getting payed for a below mediocrity playing level, so they decide to just stop trying all together.

Oh wait, this has been happening for years.

Gay Ork Wang 12-29-2008 06:30 AM

i hope the packers

BufFan71 12-29-2008 07:33 AM

Buffalo

only if Dick Jauron is back

tjsunstein 12-29-2008 07:42 AM

No one. It takes someone realllyyyy bad.

Geo 12-29-2008 11:29 AM

Why would someone give up a 2nd round pick for Torry Holt? He's a fraud with a bad knee or two, signed through only 2009 on his current contract and he's already looking to free agency. At best, you might get a 4th round pick for him.

I'd much, much rather trade for Chad Johnson between the two.

Ward 12-29-2008 11:34 AM

I hope for the sake of the league that bf51 is right and it's 3 or 4 decades before an embarrassment like this ever happens again. Lord have mercy.

The Unseen 12-29-2008 12:07 PM

[selfloathing]The Jaguars[/selfloathing]

Buffalo actually doesn't sound that bad of a choice. But yeah, it won't happen again for awhile.

Geo 12-29-2008 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ward (Post 1392646)
I hope for the sake of the league that bf51 is right and it's 3 or 4 decades before an embarrassment like this ever happens again. Lord have mercy.

The 2007 Miami Dolphins, with a 16-game season, didn't win a game in regulation either. They beat Baltimore in overtime, and that was a game that Baltimore should have won frankly.

CC.SD 12-29-2008 01:05 PM

Is it really impossible to foresee...the Lions? heck no.

keylime_5 12-29-2008 01:16 PM

No one will, but the best bet I think would be Oakland if they take a big step backwards and get the injury bug....or if they hire Art Shell again :)

SuperMcGee 12-29-2008 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BufFan71 (Post 1392344)
Buffalo

only if Dick Jauron is back

Jauron's Bills = 7-9. Guaranteed. Then again, we're nothing without playing the AFC and NFC West, and Jauron/Turk looks worse every day.

Ward 12-29-2008 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geo (Post 1392821)
The 2007 Miami Dolphins, with a 16-game season, didn't win a game in regulation either. They beat Baltimore in overtime, and that was a game that Baltimore should have won frankly.

I'm actually impressed with that stat, I was not aware! Am I the only one who didn't know this? Or let me re-phrase, was I the only one not paying any attention whatsoever to the Dolphins last year?

Menardo75 12-29-2008 04:56 PM

If the Lions would have gotten a game with the Browns we would not even be talking about this.

WMD 12-29-2008 05:28 PM

I doubt they go 0-16.. but I'll put my money on the Raiders and the BUCS as being the worst teams next year!

captainjack27 12-29-2008 05:33 PM

no one, the rams will get at least one victory next year in that awful division.

Vikes99ej 12-29-2008 05:35 PM

The Green Bay Packers. And the year after that.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.