Draft Countdown Forums

Draft Countdown Forums (http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/index.php)
-   2015 NFL Draft Forum (http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=47)
-   -   Redskins to Get RG3 (http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/showthread.php?t=51493)

Docta 03-09-2012 10:29 PM

Redskins to Get RG3
 
Per Jay Glazer: http://t.co/J2d3adVt

Quote:

Major scoopage: Redskins have agreed to a trade w Rams for #2 pick of draft. Rams and Skins swap first rounders this yr w Rams also getting 2 future #1s and additional picks. Story coming on fox sports dot com
Move over Rex Grossman, RG3's coming to town.

Grizzlegom 03-09-2012 10:29 PM

Redskins to Get RGIII
 
Jay Glazer reporting the Redskins have agreed to a trade with the Rams:

Major scoopage: Redskins have agreed to a trade w Rams for #2 pick of draft. Rams and Skins swap (cont) http://tl.gd/gbhvr8

Hermstheman83 03-09-2012 10:31 PM

Do you think they know something we don't about manning?

Grizzlegom 03-09-2012 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hermstheman83 (Post 2893510)
Do you think they know something we don't about manning?

Yea, that he doesn't want to play in Washington, haha

Grizzlegom 03-09-2012 10:35 PM

Schefter confirms, 3 first round picks and a 2nd rounder. Wonder what year the second rounder is.

Washington Redskins traded three first-round draft picks and a second-round pick to St. Louis for second overall... http://fb.me/Q2ydwWXu

Mr.Regular 03-09-2012 10:38 PM

Wow.

First reaction: Thats a HUGE price to pay.
Second reaction: Cleveland is still insane not for matching.

descendency 03-09-2012 10:39 PM

That's nuts.

3 firsts (2012, 13, and 14)
1 second (probably not 2012... because they'll need a WR in this class)

and more picks? I hope the Rams at least gave them a BJ too...

bored of education 03-09-2012 10:40 PM

The Redskins traded three first round picks and a second round pick for the No. 2 overall pick.

Clev is smart for not giving up both 4-22 and next years 1 for RG3 because that was only 2 years of 1's where St L wanted a 3 year involved even if it meant a 3rd year 2nd and Clev did not want to give a up a pick 3 years from now

descendency 03-09-2012 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr.Regular (Post 2893528)
Second reaction: Cleveland is still insane not for matching.

They would have had to give up pick 4, 22, 37, a 2013 first, and some...

That's crazy. I'd just make a play for Matt Flynn or keep building for next year.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bored of education (Post 2893533)
The Redskins traded three first round picks and a second round pick for the No. 2 overall pick.

And maybe more (though, I have a feeling it'll be like a 2014 6th rounder or something)

diabsoule 03-09-2012 10:41 PM

Damn, Washington got trade RAPED with crunchy peanut butter for lube. That hurts.

Also, Scott called this trade in his latest mock.

Rashaan Salaam 03-09-2012 10:43 PM

Its only 2 1st Rd Picks because they swapped 2012 1st Rd Picks

bored of education 03-09-2012 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diabsoule (Post 2893537)
Damn, Washington got trade RAPED with crunchy peanut butter for lube. That hurts.

Also, Scott called this trade in his latest mock.

yuppppppppppp

TitansCJftw 03-09-2012 10:48 PM

Well at least all those worthless redskins games i get on fox every weekend will be slightly more interesting

STsACE 03-09-2012 10:51 PM

3 1st rders and a 2nd, maybe more. Glad the Browns didn't try to top it.


EDIT: Apparently we did try to top it. Rumored we offered 3 1sts and a 2nd, but Rams took the Skins deal

Brodeur 03-09-2012 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rashaan Salaam (Post 2893540)
Its only 2 1st Rd Picks because they swapped 2012 1st Rd Picks

Two first rounders is A LOT to move up 4 spots, especially when you realize that picks are worth more now with the rookie salary system in effect. Redskins REALLY value Robert Griffin.

norcalgsr 03-09-2012 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brodeur (Post 2893563)
Two first rounders is A LOT to move up 4 spots, especially when you realize that picks are worth more now with the rookie salary system in effect. Redskins REALLY value Robert Griffin.

They're only worth more if the Redskins finish with a poor record.

Brodeur 03-09-2012 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by norcalgsr (Post 2893569)
They're only worth more if the Redskins finish with a poor record.

Their receivers kinda blow, they don't have much of an offensive line, and Roy Helu is their man back (right? I think he is). It's not like they have a world beating offense that they're adding a final piece to.

diabsoule 03-09-2012 10:58 PM

It does open up the Redskins to going hog wild (pun intended) in FA. VJax, OL (Nicks?), Garcon, whoever.

descendency 03-09-2012 11:09 PM

On the positive side, now the Redskins can have a bounty program and not lose their first round picks!

akvikefan89 03-09-2012 11:13 PM

I've had Washington picking #2 for weeks now. This was just too perfect a coach/player match.

But that price... wow. RG3 officially has more pressure on him than Andrew Luck IMO.

holt_bruce81 03-09-2012 11:14 PM

Worst scenerio for Rams....

1. Luck
2. RG3
3. Kalil
4. Blackmon
5. Claiborne

Who would the Rams take? Trent? Floyd?

Bulldogs 03-09-2012 11:21 PM

Huge price to pay for a pick, but I respect a team that has the balls to go up and get their guy. RGIII is going to get a ton of media attention now. Do the Skins now make a push for Vincent Jackson? Hopefully for them Leonard Hankerson does a lot of developing during the offseason.

TACKLE 03-09-2012 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by holt_bruce81 (Post 2893624)
Worst scenerio for Rams....

1. Luck
2. RG3
3. Kalil
4. Blackmon
5. Claiborne

Who would the Rams take? Trent? Floyd?

Poe. 10101010

Wrathman 03-09-2012 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by holt_bruce81 (Post 2893624)
Worst scenerio for Rams....

1. Luck
2. RG3
3. Kalil
4. Blackmon
5. Claiborne

Who would the Rams take? Trent? Floyd?

They'd trade down again (if possible) or consider Reiff most likely.

diabsoule 03-09-2012 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by holt_bruce81 (Post 2893624)
Worst scenerio for Rams....

1. Luck
2. RG3
3. Kalil
4. Blackmon
5. Claiborne

Who would the Rams take? Trent? Floyd?

Richardson or Cox, IMO


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.