Originally Posted by robert pancake gallery
everyone knows that animals you hunt don't have feelings but dogs do... huntings just a nice friendly sport but dogfighting theres animals actually getting hurt and dying
I love the argument that hunting is more moral because the animal at least has a chance to survive.
First of all, most dogs that fight don't die.
Second of all, what type of ridiculous argument is that?
If Im a serial sniper, do I get a pass by the law because the people I went after at least had a chance to survive unlike people I captured and tortured?
Or if I kill a mass amount of people with one single shots instead of torturing them to death, can I get a pass?
But seriously, I don't want to turn this thread into that argument because it goes on forever.