Giants Mock Draft Competition - Page 2

Malaka · 04-24-2010, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LTgiants

LOL I was the worst. But how come I didnt get points for picking a MLB and a OL men when we did.

My bad you actually had 3 points, but I only gave points to OL if it was the position which is arguable, if you want I'll go back and re-tally. The only OL points I have were to people who picked a guard. Which is what Petrus is.

Malaka · 04-24-2010, 10:33 PM

TBH, I think someone else needs to tally the points because I was kind of vague with my rules... TDmaker has DE in round 7 which is what Scott has Tracy as but for us he is a OLB, and also he then technically has 3 LBs which would make him have 5 points, then technically if Tracy is a LB I get another point making me have 6... but then OL. Idk someone help me out over here.

EDIT: By changing up a few things, and with a re-count. We have a three way tie between I, Rosebud and <===8

BaLLiN · 04-24-2010, 10:43 PM

lol malaka, i think its safe to say, we all pretty much had no idea what the hell Reese would do because he decided to take what he thought was the best talent out there.

Malaka · 04-25-2010, 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BaLLiN

lol malaka, i think its safe to say, we all pretty much had no idea what the hell Reese would do because he decided to take what he thought was the best talent out there.

Yeah... this draft was a pretty random one, I couldn't have guessed a DE and S being taken before LB... oh well.

Rosebud · 04-25-2010, 04:21 AM

I don't think it was that random. JPP made a lot sense at 15, I was just hoping the steelers would trade up with us for Pouncey, especially with McClain was off the board. Jones was a surprise since aparently I bought into the Jamar Chaney far more than anyone in the NFL since I think he has sweet potential. Petrus also makes sense if we were going for potential at his position, otherwise I liked Tennant more but I understand concerns that Tennant's size is unoptimal and his athleticism is unspectacular while Petrus has the potential to be a high caliber starter.

Malaka · 04-25-2010, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rosebud

I don't think it was that random. JPP made a lot sense at 15, I was just hoping the steelers would trade up with us for Pouncey, especially with McClain was off the board. Jones was a surprise since aparently I bought into the Jamar Chaney far more than anyone in the NFL since I think he has sweet potential. Petrus also makes sense if we were going for potential at his position, otherwise I liked Tennant more but I understand concerns that Tennant's size is unoptimal and his athleticism is unspectacular while Petrus has the potential to be a high caliber starter.

Position wise... no it wasn't random, however it wasn't a typical JR draft. Instead of guys who can step in and play if need be, and be solid depth from day 1, the guys we got this year are mostly projects who need a year or 2... or 3...