Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyz
Well the Big East needs to get a like TCU to keep it's AQ Bid. If they don't the AQ Bid should get taken away.
|
Here's a little data just for hell of it:
Edited since news has broke of Hawaii's extended offer to join the MWC
Since the creation of the BCS in 1998, the Big East has had every team, with the exception of Rutgers and Syracuse, maintain a winning percentage at or above .500 with the top team in the Big East, West Virginia, maintain the highest winning percentage. South Florida and Connecticut, the two teams in the Big East that have upgraded their football teams to the FBS level in 2000, rank near the top of the Big East's ranking despite competing in the conference for only five and six years respectively.
Here is the total win/loss percentage of each team and the conference as a whole since 1998:
West Virginia 98-50, .662
Louisville 97-53, .647
South Florida 75-44, .630
Connecticut 62-58, .567
Cincinnati 83-65, .560
Pittsburgh 81-65, .555
Rutgers 64-79, .447
Syracuse 61-82, .426
Total: 621-496 (.556)
Since the Big East is looking to expand here is what the two of the more likely schools (UCF, ECU) would do for the conference's winning percentage.
East Carolina (74-73, .503)
Central Florida (70-73, .489)
Total: 765-615 (.554)
The Big East's total winning percentage does not take that much of a hit by adding ECU or UCF but they would be adding two teams that are right in the middle between Pittsburgh and Rutgers winning percentages. In the long run, however, it would add to the overall competitiveness of the league, boost membership to a more manageable 10 teams, and should help solidify their BCS status.
On the flip side is the Mountain West, the top non-AQ conference, and their bid in trying to create and automatic BCS bid. TCU leads the pack in winning percentage for the conference while Utah, who is leaving for the Pac-10 this year, comes in second. There is no doubt that the top half of the conference is strong with traditional power team like TCU, Utah, and BYU maintaining strong W-L records but what drags the conference down as a whole is the weak bottom half. Wyoming, UNLV, San Diego State, and New Mexico have deplorable W-L records which significantly brings down the conference's strength as a whole.
Here is a look at the conference with Utah and without:
TCU (108-38, .740)
Utah (102-43, .702)
BYU (98-53. .649)
Air Force (86-60, .589)
Colorado State (77-70., .524)
New Mexico (66-80, .452)
Wyoming (57-83, .407)
UNLV (44-96, .314)
San Diego State (50-91, .355)
Total: 688-614, .528 (w/ Utah
Total: 586-571 (.506) (w/o Utah)
In their efforts to boost their strength due to the departures of Utah (to the Pac-10) and BYU (to football independence), the Mountain West have added the best non-AQ team (Boise State) along with two solid football programs in Fresno State and Nevada. Now news has been issued that the University of Hawaii has been extended an offer to join the MWC as a football-only school which brings in one of the strongest non-AQ programs out there. By adding those schools, especially Boise State, their conference winning percentage improves as a whole but still falls short of what the Big East's percentage is.
Boise State (102-15, .872)
TCU (108-38, .740)
Air Force (86-60, .589)
Fresno State (94-60, .584, since 2000)
Hawaii (89-67, .570)
Colorado State (77-70., .524)
Nevada (59-64, .480, since 2000)*
Wyoming (57-83, .407)
UNLV (44-96, .314)
San Diego State (50-91, .355)
New Mexico (66-80, .452)
Total: 832-724 (.535)
Despite those gains by adding those four schools, it still does not best the Big East's winning percentage. If the best non-AQ schools in the non-AQ leagues wanted to ban together to create a "power" conference, then this is what it would look like for W-L records and winning percentages.
Boise State (102-15, .872, since 2001)*
TCU (108-38, .740)
BYU (98-53. .649)
Southern Miss (90-60, .600)
Air Force (86-60, .589)
Fresno State (94-60, .584, since 2000)
Hawaii (89-67, .570)
Colorado State (77-70., .524)
Nevada (59-64, .480, since 2000)*
Houston (70-76, .479, since 2000)
Total: 873-563 (.608)
That is a 10 team conference, however, if they would like to expand to 12 teams in order to gain the ever lucrative conference championship game then Tulsa and Southern Methodist would probably be the front runners. Southern Methodist would be added for the Dallas/Forth worth market value and because of their cross-town rivalry with TCU. Despite their lack of success since 1998 and beyond, the Mustangs are heading in the right direction now with June Jones as their head coach. While it lowers their overall winning percentage by adding them, it would hopefully help out in the long run. Tulsa was added because of the geographic fit and strength in football and basketball.
Boise State (102-15, .872, since 2001)*
TCU (108-38, .740)
BYU (98-53. .649)
Southern Miss (90-60, .600)
Air Force (86-60, .589)
Fresno State (94-60, .584, since 2000)
Hawaii (89-67, .570)
Colorado State (77-70., .524)
Nevada (59-64, .480, since 2000)*
Houston (70-76, .479, since 2000)
Tulsa (68-80, .459)
Southern Methodist (43-97, .307)
Total: 984-740 (.571)
A twelve team conference with those teams involved would look like such:
East: Houston, SMU, Southern Miss, TCU, Tulsa, Air Force
West: Boise State, BYU, Hawaii, Fresno State, Nevada, Colorado State
Are these BCS conferences? That would remain to be seen, it would more than likely help if a name brand like BYU were to join such a conference as you would have marketable teams like the Cougars, TCU, and Boise State along with what could be a strong slew of games (TCU vs. Boise State, Boise State vs. BYU, Nevada vs. BYU, Fresno State vs. Boise State, Houston vs. TCU, etc...). Will this ever happen? That is doubtful but if it does they would more than likely be granted BCS status.