49ers Gameday Thread: Week 4: 49ers at Eagles

[Ness]

Originally Posted by binary

how do you explain Sanchez then? he sucks. Even without Flacco, I'm pretty sure they still had a winning record, it's not like they became an average team.

I don't remember listing Sanchez among the guys I thought were elite. So I don't know why you're bringing him up. Without Flacco the Ravens have had a winning record in their history. You can say that about any team ever, except Houston. The Ravens have never had three straight winning seasons though, Flacco helped make that happen. Think about it. What is the longest tenure of a Ravens' quarterback in franchise history? Three years maybe?

[binary]

Originally Posted by Ness

I don't remember listing Sanchez among the guys I thought were elite. So I don't know why you're bringing him up. Without Flacco the Ravens have had a winning record in their history. You can say that about any team ever, except Houston. The Ravens have never had three straight winning seasons though, Flacco helped make that happen. Think about it. What is the longest tenure of a Ravens' quarterback in franchise history? Three years maybe?

ur right, I was multitasking at work and totally misinterpreted your argument. Anyways, I guess my point was that a QB that "dominates" isn't really needed to be a good team; and a "dominant" QB does not equate to being considered a good QB. The Jets were contenders with Sanchez at QB, and Freeman and Flacco hardly dominate but are considered good.