|
|
| 2013 NFL Draft Forum Discuss the 2013 NFL Draft |
01-19-2012, 09:10 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
SWDC Mafia
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ohio State University Alumni
Posts: 30,527
Reputation: 1952670
|
McShay Says 5 QBs Could Go in Round 1
About Osweiler: "More tape I've watched, more impressed I am. Unbelievable tools. Could move into late 1st rd."
Also mentioned Tannehill and Foles as first round possibilities.
I'll say this, I wouldn't be overly surprised if Foles/Osweiler rise during offseason with the need at QB.
|
|
|
|   Sponsored Advertisement |
|   Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
01-19-2012, 09:12 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: If you get jammed up don't mention my name
Posts: 10,383
Reputation: 3916927
|
I believe it'll be four but I'm still not buying Foles.
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 09:18 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mike Glennon mating ritual
Posts: 2,986
Reputation: 143049
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane P. Hallam
About Osweiler: "More tape I've watched, more impressed I am. Unbelievable tools. Could move into late 1st rd."
Also mentioned Tannehill and Foles as first round possibilities.
I'll say this, I wouldn't be overly surprised if Foles/Osweiler rise during offseason with the need at QB.
|
wat
I guess the new rookie deals have changed the way teams approach drafting that position
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 09:26 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,067
Reputation: 60847
|
I say 3.
Luck
Griffen
And some one will reach for Tanehill to develop him.
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 09:28 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 582
Reputation: 21641
|
Ryan Mallett>>>>Tanneyhill,Foles and Osweiler. Offer Belichick your 2013 1st. I'm sure he'll listen.
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 09:30 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,067
Reputation: 60847
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane P. Hallam
About Osweiler: "More tape I've watched, more impressed I am. Unbelievable tools. Could move into late 1st rd."
Also mentioned Tannehill and Foles as first round possibilities.
I'll say this, I wouldn't be overly surprised if Foles/Osweiler rise during offseason with the need at QB.
|
McShay probably watched Osweiler and saw one pass that was like WOW and forgot the rest of his footage and thought if he can do that more, he'd be great.
Osweiler is 6'7 with a big arm. Thats it.
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 09:41 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sean Mannion Bandwagon
Posts: 3,398
Reputation: 301793
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SchizophrenicBatman
wat
I guess the new rookie deals have changed the way teams approach drafting that position
|
I think last year's draft changed the approach in how to draft QBs. It's a QB driven league now, the position is at a premium more than ever. The rules have been skewed heavily in the offense's favor.
I don't see Foles as a first rounder though. He reminds me of Josh Freeman physically and skillset wise. Both are big guys with good but not huge arms.
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 09:46 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Mage Bros
All-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,173
Reputation: 1796784
|
Good. It pushes good talent down that much farther. Keep reaching, losers!
__________________
Thanks for the sig BK
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 09:48 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,926
Reputation: 1142072
|
I just don't get how this Foles thing won't go away. I absolutely don't see it on tape.
Osweiler is going to be overdrafted based on tools, but at least he has that going for him.
__________________

R.I.P. Junior Seau
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 09:48 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 13,301
Reputation: 228420
|
I don't think there will be 5. I think Luck and Griffin obviously go at the top of the draft, and Tannehill finds his way into the first round (probably not top 15 if he doesn't ever really workout with his foot injury). Osweiller might go high b/c of his tools like a lot of QBs have done. I don't see Osweiller and Foles both sneaking into round 1. Foles seems like a classic 2nd rounder. Then again a few analysts and scouts I've heard love Foles, so you never know.
__________________
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 10:18 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Mage Bros
All-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,173
Reputation: 1796784
|
What teams need a QB (or at least may believe they do)?
Colts - They'll take Luck
Browns - They'll take RG3 unless someone leapfrogs them
Redskins - They'll try to leapfrog the Browns or get Flynn
Dolphins - Probably don't have what it takes to get RG3, will they really spend a 1st on a lower-end 1st round QB like Tannehill?
Seahawks - I have no idea
Broncos - Elway wants a real QB but can they spend a 1st on one?
I think the Colts, Browns, and Skins are the ones that will for-sure start 2012 with a new QB in place, with at least two of them drafting one. Of the final three teams, one of them will probably take Tannehill. Beyond that, I have a hard time seeing any other QB go in the 1st this season.
__________________
Thanks for the sig BK
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 10:22 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 155
Reputation: 9286
|
If Blaine Gabbert can be a top 10 pick.....
__________________
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 10:26 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,425
Reputation: 551798
|
I knew it was only a matter of time before McShay started ringing the Osweiler bell. They're both represented by CAA (same with Gabbert and Sanchez - McShay's two previous love affairs).
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 10:43 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 802
Reputation: 23856
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefridge15
If Blaine Gabbert can be a top 10 pick.....
|
This pretty much says all that needs to be said.
__________________
"He had no teeth, and he was slobbering all over himself. I'm thinking, 'You can have your money back, just get me out of here. Let me go be an accountant." I can't tell you how badly I wanted out of there." Elway's take on Lambert
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 10:47 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 17,837
Reputation: 1277265
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bruschis4all
Ryan Mallett>>>>Tanneyhill,Foles and Osweiler. Offer Belichick your 2013 1st. I'm sure he'll listen.
|
You may not be that far off on that prediction.
Of the two i like Osweiller better but Foles might look the part with a good combine, he's probably not too far skill wise from Gabbert.
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 10:47 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 33,632
Reputation: 2707136
|
I'm glad my team doesn't need a QB. All I can say...
Those guys in the first round. Makes my head hurt.
__________________
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 11:06 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 582
Reputation: 21641
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Babylon
You may not be that far off on that prediction.
Of the two i like Osweiller better but Foles might look the part with a good combine, he's probably not too far skill wise from Gabbert.
|
I'm thinking Cleveland if they don't trade up for RG3 or sign Flynn. Get all of your weapons with your early picks this year. Mallett has had a year to study under Brady. Could probably step right in and play. Pretty sure Cleveland can make it to 8-8. Wouldn't be a Top 12 pick. I know some guys without a strong arm have done well in Cleveland. Sipe and Kosar. But, having a big arm wouldn't hurt given the conditions they play in sometimes.
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 11:30 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 7,878
Reputation: 457497
|
It should be three. But the way teams overvalue Quarterbacks these days, it wouldn't surprise me to see six go in the first.
__________________
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 11:33 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 33,632
Reputation: 2707136
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by holt_bruce81
It should be three. But the way teams overvalue Quarterbacks these days, it wouldn't surprise me to see six go in the first.
|
I was unable to find, via internet search, an adequate picture to express my feelings on that statement.
There are two, TWO! first round worthy QBs this year, and they're going to be gone within the top 4 picks.
To anyone else whose team needs a QB and doesn't get one of those two...may the football gods have mercy on your soul.
__________________
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 11:34 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 231
Reputation: 6603
|
Sounds like McShay as usual.
I don't see their being more QB's in the first than last year. Maybe this is because a knee jerk reaction to last year, where Dalton fell a bit far.
The Mallett pick seems even more opportune now. I agree that why not throw an offer to the Pats? Is he much worse that these unproven guys a year older with a year of Pats system?
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 11:34 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 74
Reputation: 7110
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by killxswitch
Good. It pushes good talent down that much farther. Keep reaching, losers!
|
same thing i'm thinking.
good. panthers can reap the rewards.
maybe some dumb team will trade up and give the panthers picks like the falcons were dumb enough to give up for julio.
mcshay is a moron, but i hope he's right with this.
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 11:42 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 7,878
Reputation: 457497
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerBaron
I was unable to find, via internet search, an adequate picture to express my feelings on that statement.
There are two, TWO! first round worthy QBs this year, and they're going to be gone within the top 4 picks.
To anyone else whose team needs a QB and doesn't get one of those two...may the football gods have mercy on your soul.
|
I think Tannehill is first round worthy. But after him and the obvious other two, that's it.
We all know the steal will come later in the draft from whoever selects Russell Wilson.
__________________
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 11:50 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 33,632
Reputation: 2707136
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by holt_bruce81
I think Tannehill is first round worthy. But after him and the obvious other two, that's it.
We all know the steal will come later in the draft from whoever selects Russell Wilson.
|
Wilson might be able to be a slightly better Seneca Wallace. That's about all.
__________________
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 01:26 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 708
Reputation: 145896
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bruschis4all
Ryan Mallett>>>>Tanneyhill,Foles and Osweiler. Offer Belichick your 2013 1st. I'm sure he'll listen.
|
Mallett also >>>> Gabbert, Locker, Ponder....but that didn't help him go ahead of them.
|
|
|
01-19-2012, 01:35 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Enfield, CT
Posts: 2
Reputation: 0
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rawdawg
Mallett also >>>> Gabbert, Locker, Ponder....but that didn't help him go ahead of them.
|
Mallett is going to be the back up next year when Hoyer splits. He is not >>>>>> Locker
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 AM.
|