|
|
| Pro Football Discuss professional football. |
04-20-2012, 08:25 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: State of Golden Insincerity
Posts: 402
Reputation: 59934
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WCH
I think that the only thing we disagree on is the point about Minnesota jumping to the front of the line for teams looking to relocate. I think that Toronto and San Antonio still get first dibs (not counting LA), if they want the team; not to mention that the NFL and the city of LA seem to think that the city can support two teams (despite evidence to the contrary). Of course, all bets are off if an owner just wants to move his team to a specific city.
Minneapolis is obviously too big of a market to go without a team forever. I just think that they could be in for a 10-20 year wait (I think Baltimore had to wait 13 years). Cleveland and Houston were just very lucky that their teams left at a time when the NFL went expansion-crazy.
|
UMMMHHH, sad but true.
Goodell sounds like what he did in the press conference was what he does best, noncommittal posturing toward the most PC position.
An owner as the driving force who moves HIS team to Los Angeles, yeah sounds about like what will actually occur. We saw NFL owners behave like self-anointed demi-gods in the CBA debate a yr. ago, now we will treated even more of this.
So it comes down to Zygi Wolf to pull the trigger on the Vikings LA relo. Ball's in your court Zygi, the Commish will support you 100% on what you decide, but you're the one who will have to push all his chips into the pot as the League will take zero risk.
Harbaugh & the 9ers crushing defense await the new LA team at the pass.....
|
|
|
|   Sponsored Advertisement |
|   Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
04-20-2012, 09:08 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
TomTom Out
Legend
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: the 28th state
Posts: 25,824
Reputation: 4161926
|
I wish people would stop bringing up San Antonio. They would not support an NFL franchise.
__________________
Pick the Winners / '08: 171-96 (W) / '09: 177-90 / '10: 171-96 / '11: 183-84 (W) / '12: 173-94
|
|
|
04-20-2012, 10:03 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 911
Reputation: 16178
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WCH
I think that the only thing we disagree on is the point about Minnesota jumping to the front of the line for teams looking to relocate. I think that Toronto and San Antonio still get first dibs (not counting LA), if they want the team; not to mention that the NFL and the city of LA seem to think that the city can support two teams (despite evidence to the contrary). Of course, all bets are off if an owner just wants to move his team to a specific city.
Minneapolis is obviously too big of a market to go without a team forever. I just think that they could be in for a 10-20 year wait (I think Baltimore had to wait 13 years). Cleveland and Houston were just very lucky that their teams left at a time when the NFL went expansion-crazy.
|
San Antonio is not nearly as attractive of a market to the NFL as Minneapolis/St. Paul. It's about 2/3 the size and only about 3.5 hours from two of the most popular franchises in the league which would result in split allegiances. Not to mention, MSP is a bit more attractive in terms of being a favorable media market:
http://www.janson.com/media/2008/12/...ision-markets/
I could maybe get behind Toronto being a more viable option after LA, but that's about it aside from trying to expand to London which seems highly improbable. And it's pretty evident that if any team were to move to Toronto it's going to be the Bills.
Nonetheless, this conversation is meaningless. Minnesota is going to approve this. But, LA is going to get a team sooner rather than later. Jacksonville's new owner is apparently committed to staying in Jacksonville (no idea why) so that leaves Buffalo, Carolina, Oakland, St. Louis as the only options as far as I'm concerned. Maybe I'm wrong about that, I'm sure you all have better clarity on that.
|
|
|
04-21-2012, 01:03 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NC State
Posts: 7,691
Reputation: 820455
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent
I wish people would stop bringing up San Antonio. They would not support an NFL franchise.
|
And LA will? I think San Antonio has better odds than LA.
|
|
|
04-21-2012, 07:49 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
TomTom Out
Legend
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: the 28th state
Posts: 25,824
Reputation: 4161926
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by descendency
And LA will? I think San Antonio has better odds than LA.
|
San Antonio is Cowboys territory. More importantly, even if people bought to the idea of leaving the beloved Cowboys for a new team, San Antonio is not a city with an economy that will support two professional teams. The Spurs are successful, financially, because NBA games are affordable. Just because SA is a large metroplex, does not mean that it could support an NFL franchise.
__________________
Pick the Winners / '08: 171-96 (W) / '09: 177-90 / '10: 171-96 / '11: 183-84 (W) / '12: 173-94
|
|
|
04-21-2012, 09:23 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,062
Reputation: 1838187
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent
San Antonio is Cowboys territory. More importantly, even if people bought to the idea of leaving the beloved Cowboys for a new team, San Antonio is not a city with an economy that will support two professional teams. The Spurs are successful, financially, because NBA games are affordable. Just because SA is a large metroplex, does not mean that it could support an NFL franchise.
|
I think that a team in San Antonio would probably go over about as well as a team in Jacksonville. Jacksonville is the largest city in Florida, in terms of population, it's (theoretically) a safe distance away from from Miami and Tampa, and Florida loves football. In hindsight, it's pretty obvious that the Jags can't compete with the Dolphins, Bucs, and Gators (in some parts of Florida, the Gators are football). That didn't stop the NFL from trying it out. San Antonio faces similar problems, but they're still on the NFLs radar. Tom Benson considered moving the Saints there, before it became an obvious PR nightmare.
Oklahoma City is an interesting dark horse candidate. They've been a surprisingly strong market for the NBA, and we all know that Oklahoma loves it some football. If I owned a team and I was looking to relocate, they'd be on my short list.
Back on topic, I think that Minnesota miraculously finds enough votes to keep the Vikings. The fact is, having an NFL team is great for a city, and that's why cities without NFL teams are lining up to get one. Who the hell would ever plan a trip to Green Bay, Wisconsin; if it weren't for the Packers? Or Canton, Ohio; if they didn't have the Pro Football Hall of Fame? Would anybody ever willingly go to Detroit if they didn't have the Lions and host the Super Bowl every so often? An NFL presence turns a city into a destination. The NFL and the Vikings just called a political bluff, IMO.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by cajuncorey
3. Bjoern Werener – Flordia State – Vince from shamwow once said “Germans make good stuff”
|
Last edited by WCH : 04-21-2012 at 09:28 AM.
|
|
|
04-21-2012, 09:32 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ft. Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 681
Reputation: 55884
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WCH
Would anybody ever willingly go to Detroit if they didn't have the Lions
|
No. Absolutely not. There's only 2 reasons to go to Detroit. Tigers and Lions.
|
|
|
04-21-2012, 11:14 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: State of Golden Insincerity
Posts: 402
Reputation: 59934
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent
San Antonio is Cowboys territory. More importantly, even if people bought to the idea of leaving the beloved Cowboys for a new team, San Antonio is not a city with an economy that will support two professional teams. The Spurs are successful, financially, because NBA games are affordable. Just because SA is a large metroplex, does not mean that it could support an NFL franchise.
|
Yes it's true, I grew up in that town. Essentially SA is is Cowboys territory, it's reflected in the local sports media (author Larry McMurtry was however right when he termed it the "wretched Texas press" & it applies to sports too) & Dallas fans there are proud of their multi-generational status as such. A few Texans fans have come out of hiding with their recent success, but the Cowboys basically own the place & have camps in my alma mater there, Trinity University.
SA itself is owned by the Spurs, but then again the whole LA vast metroplex itself is owned by the Dodgers & Lakers. None of them would welcome an NFL team showing up.
The fact that LA is the #2 mkt. will pull an NFL team there, probably an existing one, & Goodell's glowing speech about how the NFL wants to keep the Vikes in Minnesota will evaporate rapidly when the hundreds of millions of $ are bait on the hook to the League to support a move to LA
Last edited by jojo : 04-22-2012 at 01:17 PM.
|
|
|
04-21-2012, 06:55 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: toronto
Posts: 7,056
Reputation: 114301
|
What are the chances of a team moving to Vancouver? Maybe the Rams? Could allow them to stay in the West
__________________
|
|
|
04-21-2012, 06:58 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Legend
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 25,358
Reputation: 2361116
|
Toronto needs a football team. Buffalo really should move to Toronto.
Buffalo to Toronto, Jaguars to LA.
__________________
Thanks BoneKrusher
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcheTen
Jason Pierre-Paul is a better and more productive player than Brandon Graham
|
|
|
|
04-21-2012, 07:20 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,253
Reputation: 783524
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PACKmanN
What are the chances of a team moving to Vancouver? Maybe the Rams? Could allow them to stay in the West
|
If Canada gets a team it's going to be the Bills to Toronto. Vancouver couldn't even support an NBA team. Toronto would be guaranteed not to fail. It's the 5th largest city in North America, and they could keep most of the current Bills fans. Buffalo to Toronto is comparable to Lansing to Detroit, Milwaukee to Green Bay, or Columbus to Cincinnati. Not that it wouldn't still suck for Buffalo fans, but they wouldn't be losing their team completely.
|
|
|
04-21-2012, 07:28 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: toronto
Posts: 7,056
Reputation: 114301
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mufasa
If Canada gets a team it's going to be the Bills to Toronto. Vancouver couldn't even support an NBA team. Toronto would be guaranteed not to fail. It's the 5th largest city in North America, and they could keep most of the current Bills fans. Buffalo to Toronto is comparable to Lansing to Detroit, Milwaukee to Green Bay, or Columbus to Cincinnati. Not that it wouldn't still suck for Buffalo fans, but they wouldn't be losing their team completely.
|
Yet this is the same fanbase that only support the Raptors or Blue Jays when they're successful.
Vancouver has great support for the BC Lions, last time I've checked. Which is a football team for the city in the CFL.
__________________
|
|
|
04-21-2012, 07:42 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,192
Reputation: 555748
|
The divisions really aren't based on location anymore, how are the titans, texans, jaguars and COLTs in the same division.
It's always made more sense for the Dolphins to be in the AFC South and moving the Colts to the AFC East (where they originally were), but at that time they didn't want to interfer with the division rivals.
Remember when the Titans used to play the Steelers, Ravens, Browns, Bengals as division rivals? Most don't.
The NFL needs to realize that while some rivalries shouldn't be messed with, but some things are more practical and right now the division alignment isn't.
St Louis going to Seattle, Arizona and San Fran.
Dallas going to Philly, NY,and WAS.
They should have totally re-organized it when the Texans joined and not just form a new division and move seattle to the nfc
|
|
|
04-21-2012, 07:45 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
The Professor (Hall of Famer)
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 34,312
Reputation: 1571106
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mufasa
If Canada gets a team it's going to be the Bills to Toronto. Vancouver couldn't even support an NBA team. Toronto would be guaranteed not to fail. It's the 5th largest city in North America, and they could keep most of the current Bills fans. Buffalo to Toronto is comparable to Lansing to Detroit, Milwaukee to Green Bay, or Columbus to Cincinnati. Not that it wouldn't still suck for Buffalo fans, but they wouldn't be losing their team completely.
|
???
Are you just using numbers on wikipedia or something? The Cincy metro is just as large, if not larger, than that of Columbus.
__________________
Nobody cares about your stupid fantasy team.
|
|
|
04-21-2012, 07:56 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: R4L 3:16 says I just whipped your ass
Posts: 12,110
Reputation: 2246214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bearsfan_51
???
Are you just using numbers on wikipedia or something? The Cincy metro is just as large, if not larger, than that of Columbus.
|
Maybe he's talking distance??
__________________
Props to BK for the sig
"Impulsive thinker, compulsive drinker, addict, half animal half man"
Quote:
Originally Posted by njx9
that's because we're the only animal capable of getting it from other animals. the day a goat can milk cows, it will.
|
|
|
|
04-21-2012, 08:00 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,253
Reputation: 783524
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bearsfan_51
???
Are you just using numbers on wikipedia or something? The Cincy metro is just as large, if not larger, than that of Columbus.
|
I was talking driving distances. Driving from Buffalo to Toronto takes less than 2 hours and is basically the equivalent of an instate drive that other fans around the league face. They'd still be in a reasonable distance for Buffalo fans to go to games.
By what you were thinking, all three of those examples would be wrong.
|
|
|
04-21-2012, 09:33 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Moderator
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: KO-V>O-V
Posts: 14,845
Reputation: 1045330
|
With Toronto, I'm not sure they could support a team. Yeah they have the size, but looking deeper, there are some concerns. Right now, of the 3 teams in Toronto, 2 are terrible. The Leafs have been out of the playoffs for like 8 years, they still have unbelievable support. The Raptors, not so much. The Jays are actually a good team, and are fun to watch, but there's always a sense of inevitability that if everything goes right, they'll finish no higher than 3rd place. That and there being 81 opportunities to watch the team mean they don't draw a whole lot. Toronto supports the Leafs because they're the Leafs, probably the 2nd most storied franchise in NHL history, playing the game that Canadians love.
Also, Toronto and the GTA is very heavy on immigrants. 47% of people in Toronto(don't have the #s for the GTA) identify themselves as visible minorities, and 50% were born outside Canada. Many of the immigrants are from South and East Asia, not exactly places that generally produce football fans. Obviously they can learn to love football, but with so many alternatives, including Toronto FC, available, it's not a sure thing. I live in Canada, and would love to be able to go to Toronto to watch an NFL game, but I'm not sure Toronto would be able to support the Bills better than Buffalo can.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Wright
Terrellezzzzzzzz Pryorzzzzzzzz!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by njx9
do i tell you when to flip the burger?
|
|
|
|
04-21-2012, 10:05 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: toronto
Posts: 7,056
Reputation: 114301
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelJordanEberle (sabf)
With Toronto, I'm not sure they could support a team. Yeah they have the size, but looking deeper, there are some concerns. Right now, of the 3 teams in Toronto, 2 are terrible. The Leafs have been out of the playoffs for like 8 years, they still have unbelievable support. The Raptors, not so much. The Jays are actually a good team, and are fun to watch, but there's always a sense of inevitability that if everything goes right, they'll finish no higher than 3rd place. That and there being 81 opportunities to watch the team mean they don't draw a whole lot. Toronto supports the Leafs because they're the Leafs, probably the 2nd most storied franchise in NHL history, playing the game that Canadians love.
Also, Toronto and the GTA is very heavy on immigrants. 47% of people in Toronto(don't have the #s for the GTA) identify themselves as visible minorities, and 50% were born outside Canada. Many of the immigrants are from South and East Asia, not exactly places that generally produce football fans. Obviously they can learn to love football, but with so many alternatives, including Toronto FC, available, it's not a sure thing. I live in Canada, and would love to be able to go to Toronto to watch an NFL game, but I'm not sure Toronto would be able to support the Bills better than Buffalo can.
|
Plus I don't believe support for the CFL franchise is high here in Toronto. Altough I believe if the Bills moved to Toronto, supporters would come from Hamilton and Montreal rather than Toronto. Both cities(Hamilton and Montreal) support their CFL franchises at large
It is growing upon teenagers in Toronto. As you said, it can be something in the future
I still feel as if an NFL team would fit in the Vancouver culture more so than Toronto's
__________________
|
|
|
04-21-2012, 10:54 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Empire State
Posts: 30
Reputation: 0
|
saw this article linked at profootballtalk.com: Buffalo Bills' Canadian fanbase growing rapidly.
also, the Blue Jays fanbase has been as loyal as expected in a division with the three juggernauts of MLB - Yankees, Red Sox, and Rays. with that said, Alex Anthopoulos has rebuilt the team from the ground up since he became GM in 2009, and theyre actually the darkhouse to take the wildcard this year, especially with how bad the Red Sox and Angels have been.
Raptors fans are another thing altogether. i still remember the game this season when Jeremy Lin first played there. it was pretty much a home game for the Knicks.
__________________
"Doctors and scientists said that breaking the four-minute mile was impossible, that one would die in the attempt. Thus, when I got up from the track after collapsing at the finish line, I figured I was dead."
|
|
|
04-21-2012, 11:13 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: toronto
Posts: 7,056
Reputation: 114301
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donnie D
saw this article linked at profootballtalk.com: Buffalo Bills' Canadian fanbase growing rapidly.
also, the Blue Jays fanbase has been as loyal as expected in a division with the three juggernauts of MLB - Yankees, Red Sox, and Rays. with that said, Alex Anthopoulos has rebuilt the team from the ground up since he became GM in 2009, and theyre actually the darkhouse to take the wildcard this year, especially with how bad the Red Sox and Angels have been.
Raptors fans are another thing altogether. i still remember the game this season when Jeremy Lin first played there. it was pretty much a home game for the Knicks.
|
Blue Jays loyal? Games are never close to being sold out unless the Yankees or Sox are in the city. Even then, its the opposing team's fanbase that sells out the game.
__________________
|
|
|
04-22-2012, 12:40 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wallaceburg, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 10,254
Reputation: 91676
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PACKmanN
Plus I don't believe support for the CFL franchise is high here in Toronto. Altough I believe if the Bills moved to Toronto, supporters would come from Hamilton and Montreal rather than Toronto. Both cities(Hamilton and Montreal) support their CFL franchises at large
It is growing upon teenagers in Toronto. As you said, it can be something in the future
I still feel as if an NFL team would fit in the Vancouver culture more so than Toronto's
|
I disagree, the CFL is viewed by Torontonians as minor league football and Toronto is too cosmopolitan to watch it. The Blue Jays had 4 million fans a year attend their games till a Belgian Brewery bought the team and cut the payroll by 75 million dollars. Torontonians won't accept a franchise that doesn't try to win. The Rapters have consistently failed to retain their top players so basketball has struggled a bit and who can blame their fans.
A NFL franchise that has a local owner with bucks to spend would be in a similar position that the Jays were in when they entered the league and fill the stadium on a consistent basis with little effort as long as the fans think they are trying to be successful. They have no trouble selling out Bills game where they charge a fortune to attend.
__________________
And proud of it!!!
|
|
|
04-22-2012, 12:49 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around
Posts: 13,798
Reputation: 3217389
|
Why hello!
__________________
RIP PRO FOOTBALL FORUM
|
|
|
04-22-2012, 12:19 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: toronto
Posts: 7,056
Reputation: 114301
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamcanadian
I disagree, the CFL is viewed by Torontonians as minor league football and Toronto is too cosmopolitan to watch it. The Blue Jays had 4 million fans a year attend their games till a Belgian Brewery bought the team and cut the payroll by 75 million dollars. Torontonians won't accept a franchise that doesn't try to win. The Rapters have consistently failed to retain their top players so basketball has struggled a bit and who can blame their fans.
A NFL franchise that has a local owner with bucks to spend would be in a similar position that the Jays were in when they entered the league and fill the stadium on a consistent basis with little effort as long as the fans think they are trying to be successful. They have no trouble selling out Bills game where they charge a fortune to attend.
|
Even when the year the Blue Jays went out and spent money the support by the fans was very little.
I brought up the CFL, because it is at the end of the day, a football league. It shows just how interested a city is in the sport.
Toronto sports fans are known for being bandwagoners. Very little support is given to their team unless it is successful.
Also the Bills haven't had a winning record, and haven't made the playoffs in a while now. You're bringing in a franchise that will be looked at by Toronto sports fans as a loser.
__________________
|
|
|
04-22-2012, 01:11 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 102
Reputation: 7605
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ness
This wouldn't happen. The 49ers and Rams have been rivals for decades and have the longest history within the division between any two combined teams.
|
This. I think Seattle will go the North as opposed to St Louis.
|
|
|
04-22-2012, 01:13 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bert's circle
Posts: 8,756
Reputation: 1383427
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dangermouse
This. I think Seattle will go the North as opposed to St Louis.
|
Yeah but Seattle is two time zones away from all the other teams. This would not fly at all. It would have to be St. Louis.
__________________

Bonekrusher.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JordanTaber
Football...it's rocket surgery now, folks.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:39 AM.
|