Although, I might add, that doesn't mean he's slow. Just probably means he won't be running sub-4.4. 4.50 is probably a fairly realistic expectation, then. So, conservatively, say he does measure in at 5106 192 and runs 4.5 flat. Now what kind of prospect is he? I still might take him in the second, but would rather the third if that were to be the case. Measurables are pretty important at running back. Can't think of a really good one that doesn't have something going for him in the gym. A realistic physical comparison might be Daryl Richardson of the Rams. But that doesn't say much about the way he plays.
Last edited by Caulibflower : 11-13-2012 at 11:31 PM.