|
|
| 2013 NFL Draft Forum Discuss the 2013 NFL Draft |
12-30-2012, 06:34 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
SWDC Mafia
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ohio State University Alumni
Posts: 30,529
Reputation: 1952670
|
2013 NFL Draft Order
1) Kansas City Chiefs
2) Jacksonville Jaguars
3) Oakland Raiders
4) Philadelphia Eagles
5) Detroit Lions
6) Cleveland Browns
7) Arizona Cardinals
8) Buffalo Bills
9) New York Jets
10) Tennessee Titans
11) San Diego Chargers
12) Miami Dolphins
13) Tampa Bay Buccaneers
14) Carolina Panthers
15) New Orleans Saints
16) St. Louis Rams
17) Pittsburgh Steelers
18) Dallas Cowboys
19) New York Giants
20) Chicago Bears
21) Cincinnati Bengals
22) Washington Redskins
23) Minnesota Vikings
24) Indianapolis Colts
25) Seattle Seahawks
26) Green Bay Packers
27) Houston Texans
28) Denver Broncos
Last edited by Shane P. Hallam : 01-13-2013 at 07:03 PM.
|
|
|
|   Sponsored Advertisement |
|   Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
12-30-2012, 06:51 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,645
Reputation: 156826
|
Umm, how are you getting Titans 10th? I have their opponent record at 0.465 and bills 0.480 and jets 0.512... Check your math. Also Pittsburgh is locked in at 17th as their opponents record is 0.465, not even close to the Cowboys.
Last edited by Robcards : 12-30-2012 at 07:00 PM.
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 06:54 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
SWDC Mafia
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ohio State University Alumni
Posts: 30,529
Reputation: 1952670
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robcards
Umm, how are you getting Titans 10th? I have their opponent record at 0.465 and bills 0.480 and jets 0.512... Check your math. Also Pittsburgh is locked in at 16th as their opponents record is 0.465, not even close to the Cowboys.
|
Titans at .512 right now. Jets went down. Order is correct
Last edited by Shane P. Hallam : 12-30-2012 at 07:03 PM.
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 06:56 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,645
Reputation: 156826
|
AH it was my spreadsheet messed up, don't know how I missed it before just now but I had them playing themselves twice instead of Houston. My mistake, yeah I see 0.512 now too, so coinflip with Jets right. Still have Steelers not even close to Cowboys though so that's a lock at 17, and loser of tonights game will be 18 as Redskins would have a lower opponent record than the Bears and Giants.
PS- I expanded it out to more decimal places and Jets are 0.5118 and Titans are 0.5117, the 2 ties on the Jets opponent's win-loss make it a little hairy, but it looks as though the Titans will be picking before the Jets.
Jets = 130-124-2 = 0.511811
Titans = 131-125 = 0.511718
Could use a confirmation on that but I'm pretty sure that would mean no coin flip.
Last edited by Robcards : 12-30-2012 at 07:05 PM.
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 06:59 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 255
Reputation: 5460
|
The Carson Palmer trade ended up netting the Bengals #17 and #35, one of the best trades of the past few years.
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 07:07 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,645
Reputation: 156826
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bengalbuck
The Carson Palmer trade ended up netting the Bengals #17 and #35, one of the best trades of the past few years.
|
It won't be a 35 it will be a 37 as the teams with the same record rotate every round (it will be PHI 3rd DET 4th OAK 5th in the 2nd round).
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 07:10 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,879
Reputation: 20722
|
I really hope Raiders can trade that #3 pick. Maybe Arizona if they are interested in Luke Joeckel or Buffalo who could be looking at any of the QBs. Reggie McKenzie needs to pickup as many picks as he can.
__________________
Taking a Knapp.
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 07:11 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,645
Reputation: 156826
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NIN1984
I really hope Raiders can trade that #3 pick. Maybe Arizonaif they are interested in Luke Joeckel or Buffalo who could be looking at any of the QBs. Reggie McKenzie needs to pickup as many picks as he can.
|
Really hope the Jets don't trade up to it! But with Tannenbaum likely out of the decision room for that it would be unlikely (I hope) =)
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 07:13 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,645
Reputation: 156826
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane P. Hallam
Titans at .512 right now. Jets went down. Order is correct
|
What records do you have? I have 130-124-2 for the Jets and 131-125 for the Titans, which would mean Titans picking before the Jets.
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 07:14 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
SWDC Mafia
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: You can call me Jooby Guverse
Posts: 23,919
Reputation: 5806162
|
This is the first time (since the merger) the Chiefs have ever had the first overall pick. Wow, we were bad.
edit: This was the 9th loss by 15 points or more this year for KC. No one has done that since the 81 Colts. Yay.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caddy
I want to be Vidae.
|
Quote:
<@vidae> Bomer is like an angel
<@DG> angels wish
|
Quote:
<@vidae> D:
<@comahan> D:
|
** RIP themaninblack. You will be missed. **
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 07:16 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: There's no place I can be since I found Serenity.
Posts: 19,237
Reputation: 1531153
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane P. Hallam
Titans at .512 right now. Jets went down. Order is correct
|

__________________
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 07:19 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,645
Reputation: 156826
|
Edited for retardation. Chicago 10-6 not 9-7, derp a derp lol
Last edited by Robcards : 12-30-2012 at 08:39 PM.
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 07:21 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,845
Reputation: 24524
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robcards
AH it was my spreadsheet messed up, don't know how I missed it before just now but I had them playing themselves twice instead of Houston. My mistake, yeah I see 0.512 now too, so coinflip with Jets right. Still have Steelers not even close to Cowboys though so that's a lock at 17, and loser of tonights game will be 18 as Redskins would have a lower opponent record than the Bears and Giants.
PS- I expanded it out to more decimal places and Jets are 0.5118 and Titans are 0.5117, the 2 ties on the Jets opponent's win-loss make it a little hairy, but it looks as though the Titans will be picking before the Jets.
Jets = 130-124-2 = 0.511811
Titans = 131-125 = 0.511718
Could use a confirmation on that but I'm pretty sure that would mean no coin flip.
|
tiebreaking procedure applies first.
__________________
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 07:23 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,645
Reputation: 156826
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by YotoJets007
tiebreaking procedure applies first.
|
What do you mean?
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 07:24 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,845
Reputation: 24524
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robcards
What do you mean?
|
Same record and SOS in the same division or conference, we go through tie-breaking procedure before the coin flip. Titans beat us so Jets are sitting ahead of Titans.
__________________
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 07:33 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,645
Reputation: 156826
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by YotoJets007
Same record and SOS in the same division or conference, we go through tie-breaking procedure before the coin flip. Titans beat us so Jets are sitting ahead of Titans.
|
It's not the same SOS though. Jets are 130-124-2 titans are 131-125, jets marginally have a stronger SOS
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 07:42 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,845
Reputation: 24524
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robcards
It's not the same SOS though. Jets are 130-124-2 titans are 131-125, jets marginally have a stronger SOS
|
I know. Although I am not a professional on that part, NFL is going by SOS, the percentage of W-L-T, and that's it.
Unless .0001 is a factor for rare situation like that, amateurs have Jets ahead of Titans.
__________________
Last edited by YotoJets007 : 12-30-2012 at 07:44 PM.
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 07:44 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,645
Reputation: 156826
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by YotoJets007
I know. Although I am not a professional on that part, NFL is going by SOS, the percentage of W-L-T, and that's it.
|
Right, and if its just percentage of wins and losses the jets are 0.0001 stronger, if the draws count as half a win (which I doubt is the case) then they have the same SOS
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 07:45 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,845
Reputation: 24524
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robcards
Right, and if its just percentage of wins and losses the jets are 0.0001 stronger, if the draws count as half a win (which I doubt is the case) then they have the same SOS
|
I just edited above. Like you say. Tomorrow will be the day we find out for sure.
__________________
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 07:49 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,645
Reputation: 156826
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by YotoJets007
I just edited above. Like you say. Tomorrow will be the day we find out for sure.
|
I just saw one draft order that said jets SOS is 129-125-2 which I've double and triple checked is wrong, not sure how they have 1 less win but it's 130-124-2
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 07:55 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,845
Reputation: 24524
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robcards
I just saw one draft order that said jets SOS is 129-125-2 which I've double and triple checked is wrong, not sure how they have 1 less win but it's 130-124-2
|
oh I wish I could help you. I deleted mine because I could not finish 7 round mock. lol.
__________________
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 08:07 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,538
Reputation: 306170
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vidae
This is the first time (since the merger) the Chiefs have ever had the first overall pick. Wow, we were bad.
edit: This was the 9th loss by 15 points or more this year for KC. No one has done that since the 81 Colts. Yay.
|
If you're gonna be bad, might as well be historically bad. Right?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJSchneider
If Te'o fell to us, I would wet my pants. If we then passed on him, I would poop said pants.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrdrylie
At your age, you'll probably poop and pee your paints on draft night regardless of whom the Saints Draft.
|
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 08:31 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
SWDC Mafia
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ohio State University Alumni
Posts: 30,529
Reputation: 1952670
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robcards
I just saw one draft order that said jets SOS is 129-125-2 which I've double and triple checked is wrong, not sure how they have 1 less win but it's 130-124-2
|
NFL has already announced the Top Ten, it is what I have in the first post.
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 08:33 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,645
Reputation: 156826
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane P. Hallam
NFL has already announced the Top Ten, it is what I have in the first post.
|
Really? What did it say for Jets SOS? I mean I'm all for picking 9th it just doesn't make sense mathematically
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 08:35 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,645
Reputation: 156826
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane P. Hallam
NFL has already announced the Top Ten, it is what I have in the first post.
|
Ok so it rounds up to 0.512 and 2nd tiebreaker is conference record and jets are 4-8 and titans are 5-7, sweet deal for us went in today thinking we'd be picking 11th but Carolina and Tampa win and now this
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 PM.
|