DC Posters will get a look at good scheme vs bad scheme Saturday night - Page 2

HypocrisyIsGreat · 01-10-2013, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vidae

Crabtree is basically awful.

Dumbest post I've seen on here, and that's saying something.

ImBrotherCain · 01-10-2013, 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HypocrisyIsGreat

Uh huh. You've already made a fool of yourself in this thread, so really, it doesn't matter. Packer homer. 49er homer. Troll. Crabtree homer. Yaddddddaaaaaa.

If I was a 49er homer, I'd be calling for a win. I expect the Packers to embarrass us.

"Fool of yourself"... You really think pretty highly of yourself huh?

HypocrisyIsGreat · 01-10-2013, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by G Mobile

Bro, Jordyzzz > Crab.

For real though, I think people underrate how much GB super deep receiving core and consistency of the offensive system & personnel contribute to Rodgers success. Granted Rodgers is an elite player, but I don't see him separated from Brady/Manning/Brees in my book. That OL needs to protect him more though.

Hahahaha. Nelson better than Crabs. Yeah, I'm sure Nelson would have 1100 yards in the 49er offense.

vidae · 01-10-2013, 03:50 PM

Woah, 1100 yards? That's amazing.

HypocrisyIsGreat · 01-10-2013, 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImBrotherCain

"Fool of yourself"... You really think pretty highly of yourself huh?

Compared to most of you, I'm Einstein.

HypocrisyIsGreat · 01-10-2013, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vidae

Woah, 1100 yards? That's amazing.

Well surely, it's not as impressive as the whopping 700 yards Nelson had playing with Rodgers and in mcCarthy's scheme.

Do you guys like getting your ass handed to you in football discussion, or are you all just that stupid when it comes to statzzzz?

Brodeur · 01-10-2013, 03:52 PM

Mufasa · 01-10-2013, 03:54 PM

Crabtree would be at best the 4th best WR on the Packers. And since James Jones did happen to lead the NFL in TDs I'll give him the nod over Crabtree too, so 5th.

nrk · 01-10-2013, 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HypocrisyIsGreat

Ness? Dude is useless.

First I'm a packer homer, now I'm Ness. Hahahahahahaha. Good god you guys are ****** slow.

Obvious joke is obvious.

vidae · 01-10-2013, 03:56 PM

HypocrisyIsGreat · 01-10-2013, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mufasa

Crabtree would be at best the 4th best WR on the Packers. And since James Jones did happen to lead the NFL in TDs I'll give him the nod over Crabtree too, so 5th.

Of course, that's why Ted Thompson had Crabtree the #1 player on his board in the 2009 draft.

HypocrisyIsGreat · 01-10-2013, 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vidae

Pwnerized me brah. Ness style.

vidae · 01-10-2013, 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HypocrisyIsGreat

Of course, that's why Ted Thompson had Crabtree the #1 player on his board in the 2009 draft.

A rare miss for Ted Thompson.

Brodeur · 01-10-2013, 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HypocrisyIsGreat

Ness? Dude is useless.

First I'm a packer homer, now I'm Ness. Hahahahahahaha. Good god you guys are ****** slow.

bigbluedefense · 01-10-2013, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vidae

They all look the same.

SuperPacker · 01-10-2013, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HypocrisyIsGreat

Well surely, it's not as impressive as the whopping 700 yards Nelson had playing with Rodgers and in mcCarthy's scheme.

Do you guys like getting your ass handed to you in football discussion, or are you all just that stupid when it comes to statzzzz?

Jordy only played in 12 games. He averaged 62 yards per game. Crabtree averaged 69.

Need to check those statzzzzz of yours.

HypocrisyIsGreat · 01-10-2013, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vidae

A rare miss for Ted Thompson.

Yeah, I'm sure.

HypocrisyIsGreat · 01-10-2013, 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperPacker

Jordy only played in 12 games. He averaged 62 yards per game. Crabtree averaged 69.

Need to check those statzzzzz of yours.

And you need to check the passing attemptzzzz difference between both teams.

Do you want to keep this up?

ImBrotherCain · 01-10-2013, 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HypocrisyIsGreat

Compared to most of you, I'm Einstein.

So you know math and physics. Clearly that translates to football.

jrdrylie · 01-10-2013, 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HypocrisyIsGreat

You might wanna re-check those numbers, Forrest.

San Francisco averaged 361.8 yards per game. Green Bay averaged 359.4 yards per game. Even with all the paint chips I've eaten, I can tell 361.8 is more than 359.4

The 49ers and Packers also shared 8 common opponents, so their defenses are equal. San Francisco also played Seattle (4), Arizona (12), St. Louis (14), Green Bay (11), New York Jets (8), Buffalo (22), Miami (21), New England (25). Combines rankings of 117 (average of 14.625). Green Bay played Detroit (13), Minnesota (16), Chicago (5), San Francisco (3), Houston (7), Jacksonville (30), Tennessee (27), and Indianapolis (26). Combines rankings of 127 (average of 15.875). Once again, paint chips have eaten away at my brain. but I have enough brain cells to know 14.625 is less than 15.875.

HypocrisyIsGreat · 01-10-2013, 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jrdrylie

San Francisco averaged 361.8 yards per game. Green Bay averaged 359.4 yards per game. Even with all the paint chips I've eaten, I can tell 361.8 is more than 359.4

The 49ers and Packers also shared 8 common opponents, so their defenses are equal. San Francisco also played Seattle (4), Arizona (12), St. Louis (14), Green Bay (11), New York Jets (8), Buffalo (22), Miami (21), New England (25). Combines rankings of 117 (average of 14.625). Green Bay played Detroit (13), Minnesota (16), Chicago (5), San Francisco (3), Houston (7), Jacksonville (30), Tennessee (27), and Indianapolis (26). Combines rankings of 127 (average of 15.875). Once again, paint chips have eaten away at my brain. but I have enough brain cells to know 14.625 is less than 15.875.

Now compare the passing discrepancy and get back to me. Jeeeebus.

SuperPacker · 01-10-2013, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HypocrisyIsGreat

And you need to check the passing attemptzzzz difference between both teams.

Do you want to keep this up?

Mufasa · 01-10-2013, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HypocrisyIsGreat

Of course, that's why Ted Thompson had Crabtree the #1 player on his board in the 2009 draft.

Considering he picked before the 49ers, giving him the opportunity to draft Crabtree, and passed him up, I doubt it. Quit pulling **** out of your ass.

And even it that was true, it in no way changes the fact that the other guys are better than Crabtree

HypocrisyIsGreat · 01-10-2013, 04:05 PM

Green Bay- 558 passing attempts.

San Francisco- 436 passing attempts.

Green Bay- Aaron Rodgers.

San Francisco- Alex Busto and Colin Kaepernick.

I'm quite sure these factors have NOTHING AT ALL to do with the GB WR productionzzzz.

jrdrylie · 01-10-2013, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HypocrisyIsGreat

Now compare the passing discrepancy and get back to me. Jeeeebus.

Irrelevant. You said San Francisco had a craptastic offense. I just thought you should know that San Francisco had a higher ranked offense against higher ranked defenses. So if they are craptastic, are the Packers shittastic?