Divisional Round Mock

Robcards · 01-07-2013, 02:00 PM

I intend to do a more thorough 2-3 round mock after next week when we have the top 28 order set in stone and the underclassmen have all declared. This is just a quick one for now. Keeping the ARI and OAK trade in this mock since I don't like any of the prospects at 3 for Oakland.

1. KC - Geno Smith QB WVU
2. JAC - Bjoern Werner DE FSU
3. ARI (trade with OAK) - Luke Joeckel OT TAMU
4. PHI - Star Lotuleilei DT Utah
5. DET - Dee Milliner CB Bama
6. CLE - Jarvis Jones DE/OLB UGA
7. OAK (trade with ARI) - Manti Te'o ILB ND
8. BUF - Tyler Wilson QB Ark
9. NYJ - Damontre Moore OLB TAMU
10. TEN - Chance Warmack OG Bama
11. SD - Barkevious Mingo OLB LSU
12. MIA - Keenan Allen WR Cal
13. TB - Xavier Rhodes CB FSU
14. CAR - Johnathan Hankins DT OSU
15. NO - Ezekiel Ansah DE BYU
16. STL - Taylor Lewan OT Mich
17. PIT - John Jenkins NT UGA
18. DAL - Dion Jordan OLB Oreg
19. NYG - Eric Fisher OT CMU
20. CHI - Tyler Eifert TE ND
21. CIN - Sam Montgomery DE LSU
22. STL (from WAS) - Matt Elam S UF
23. MIN - Terrance Williams WR Baylor
24. IND - Jonathan Cooper OG UNC
25. BAL - Kevin Minter ILB LSU
26. SEA - Tavon Austin WR WVU
27. SF - Eric Reid S LSU
28. HOU - Robert Woods WR USC
29. NE - Cordarelle Patterson WR Tenn
30. ATL - Zach Ertz TE Stan
31. GB - Lane Johnson OT OU
32. DEN - Sharrif Floyd DT UF

Let me know what you think, I'll take comments into consideration when I do my more thorough mock next week. Thanks!

killxswitch · 01-07-2013, 02:04 PM

Nothing wrong with Cooper to the Colts. I might prefer Travis Frederick. But interior OL is certainly a need and you gave away all the pass rushers before the 25th pick.

shylo3716 · 01-07-2013, 02:54 PM

Dee Milliner to Philly....Nnamdi is some cut!

shylo3716 · 01-07-2013, 03:04 PM

No Justin Hunter or DeAndre Hopkins?

Razor · 01-07-2013, 03:18 PM

Great Patriots pick.

coordinator0 · 01-07-2013, 03:36 PM

I like Baltimore's pick in that situation. Richardson would be good too.

cfh128 · 01-07-2013, 03:46 PM

Love that Rams draft!

Don Vito · 01-07-2013, 04:03 PM

Love the Pats pick

Robcards · 01-07-2013, 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coordinator0

I like Baltimore's pick in that situation. Richardson would be good too.

Totally forgot Sheldon Richardson. For some reason I thought I gave him to the Saints. Whoops heh

nobodyinparticular · 01-07-2013, 07:17 PM

I think every week that passes I will expect a trade down for the Raiders. Cards make sense. Rams make a ton of sense. They need a franchise LT, Raiders could trade down 15 spots and still be okay since they need so many players.

Heck Tampa Bay even makes sense if they want a QB to replace Freeman as its rumored.

CJSchneider · 01-07-2013, 09:09 PM

I'd rather see NO take Monty.

Robcards · 01-07-2013, 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nobodyinparticular

I think every week that passes I will expect a trade down for the Raiders. Cards make sense. Rams make a ton of sense. They need a franchise LT, Raiders could trade down 15 spots and still be okay since they need so many players.

Heck Tampa Bay even makes sense if they want a QB to replace Freeman as its rumored.

I don't see Fisher giving up 2 1st rounders to get joeckel, doesn't seem like his style. Cardinals make the most sense at the moment as things stand.

Robcards · 01-07-2013, 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shylo3716

No Justin Hunter or DeAndre Hopkins?

I don't think deandre is a top 5 wr and Hunters stock has been falling steadily due to his lack of ball skills, work ethic, and injury history. The other WRs in this class are much more desirable I feel. Still think deandre and hunter are early 2nd round picks, but the stock of Allen, Williams, woods, Austin, and Patterson are higher.

thebow305 · 01-08-2013, 10:12 PM

Allen works fine for me!

49erNation85 · 01-08-2013, 10:55 PM

solid pick for sf. nice work.

steelersrock151 · 01-14-2013, 09:11 PM

Don't see a NT in the first for Pittsburgh. Casey, Mcclendon, Ta'amu, and Fangupo all on the roster. Even if Casey is cut, they have depth there, unlike ILB, OLB, and safety.

Robcards · 01-15-2013, 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steelersrock151

Don't see a NT in the first for Pittsburgh. Casey, Mcclendon, Ta'amu, and Fangupo all on the roster. Even if Casey is cut, they have depth there, unlike ILB, OLB, and safety.

How unfamiliar with the steelers are you? Check Casey's contract again, he's a FA no need to cut him. Explained in the other thread why the other 3 are non-factors

SuperPacker · 01-15-2013, 06:30 AM

I don't think the Packers would go OT in the first round when we already have two 1st round offensive tackles.

Robcards · 01-15-2013, 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperPacker

I don't think the Packers would go OT in the first round when we already have two 1st round offensive tackles.

Are they performing like 1st rounders? I'd think that'd be more important.

SuperPacker · 01-15-2013, 06:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robcards

Are they performing like 1st rounders? I'd think that'd be more important.

It's hard to perform when you're injured...

Robcards · 01-15-2013, 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperPacker

It's hard to perform when you're injured...

So that's a no then. Don't see what you're getting at

SuperPacker · 01-15-2013, 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robcards

So that's a no then. Don't see what you're getting at

You do realize players come back from injuries, right? When a player gets an injury it doesn't mean he can never play again. In fact, most of the time players get back from injuries and continue to play football.

Robcards · 01-15-2013, 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperPacker

You do realize players come back from injuries, right? When a player gets an injury it doesn't mean he can never play again. In fact, most of the time players get back from injuries and continue to play football.

Wonderful. Let me know when Sherrod plays LT at a level high enough that it would inhibit the Packers from selecting one. You act as if Sherrod was a great LT and then got injured. He hasn't even played a game yet, that doesn't bode well for his future. Following your same logic, most of the time players that are out for the season their first 2 years in the nfl, aren't in the nfl very long.

SuperPacker · 01-15-2013, 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robcards

Wonderful. Let me know when Sherrod plays LT at a level high enough that it would inhibit the Packers from selecting one. You act as if Sherrod was a great LT and then got injured. He hasn't even played a game yet, that doesn't bode well for his future. Following your same logic, most of the time players that are out for the season their first 2 years in the nfl, aren't in the nfl very long.

Well I never said we couldn't pick an OT, but not in the first round. That would be stupid. It make would make sense to actually see how he played first, no? Following your logic, the Packers should've drafted a QB in the first round after Brett Favre retired. I mean, Aaron Rodgers hadn't even played any games. Oh and btw, he hasn't been out for his first two years, he got injured at the end of last season and was out for this season. He has only missed one season. Following this logic, the Chiefs should've moved on from Jamaal Charles after he was out for the whole of the 2011 season. I mean, how many players come back from season ending injuries? Oh wait, the majority of players.

Robcards · 01-15-2013, 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperPacker

Well I never said we couldn't pick an OT, but not in the first round. That would be stupid. It make would make sense to actually see how he played first, no? Following your logic, the Packers should've drafted a QB in the first round after Brett Favre retired. I mean, Aaron Rodgers hadn't even played any games. Oh and btw, he hasn't been out for his first two years, he got injured at the end of last season and was out for this season. He has only missed one season. Following this logic, the Chiefs should've moved on from Jamaal Charles after he was out for the whole of the 2011 season. I mean, how many players come back from season ending injuries? Oh wait, the majority of players.

How is that even remotely close to the same thing? Charles was an established RB before he got injured and Rodgers was never injured so how does that even come close to what I said?

Before Sherrod went down, was he a starting LT and showing promise? No. So how is it unreasonable for the packers take a LT in the first? Keeping in mind LTs aren't exactly easy to find in later rounds like the other 4 oline positions