Originally Posted by Robcards
How is that even remotely close to the same thing? Charles was an established RB before he got injured and Rodgers was never injured so how does that even come close to what I said?
Before Sherrod went down, was he a starting LT and showing promise? No. So how is it unreasonable for the packers take a LT in the first? Keeping in mind LTs aren't exactly easy to find in later rounds like the other 4 oline positions
You're obviously incapable of understanding logic, so i'll just stop arguing this.