This is a Mock Draft Full of Flaws

[princefielder28]

1. Kansas City :: Geno Smith : QB : West Virginia
2. Jacksonville :: Dion Jordan : DE : Oregon
3. Oakland :: Ezekiel Ansah : DE : Brigham Young
4. Philadelphia :: Luke Joeckel : OT : Texas A&M
5. Detroit :: Bjoern Werner : DE : Florida State
6. Cleveland :: Jarvis Jones : OLB : Georgia
7. Arizona :: Eric Fisher : OT : Central Michigan
8. Buffalo :: Mike Glennon : QB : North Carolina State
9. New York Jets :: Damontre Moore : DE : Texas A&M
10. Tennessee :: Star Lotulelei : DT : Utah
11. San Diego :: DeMarcus Milliner : CB : Alabama
12. Miami :: Cordarrelle Patterson : WR : Tennessee
13. Tampa Bay :: Barkevious Mingo : DE : Louisiana State
14. Carolina :: Sheldon Richardson : DT : Missouri
15. New Orleans :: Sharrif Floyd : DT : Florida
16. St. Louis :: Chance Warmack : OG : Alabama
17. Pittsburgh :: Alec Ogletree : ILB : Georgia
18. Dallas :: Matt Barkley : QB : USC
19. New York Giants :: Sam Montgomery : DE : Louisiana State
20. Chicago :: Jonathan Cooper : OG : North Carolina
21. Cincinnati :: Kenny Vaccaro : S : Texas
22. St. Louis (f/Washington) :: Zach Ertz : TE : Stanford
23. Minnesota :: Keenan Allen : WR : California
24. Indianapolis :: Johnathan Hankins : DT : Ohio State
25. Seattle :: DJ Fluker : OT : Alabama
26. Green Bay :: Kevin Minter : LB : Louisiana State
27. Houston :: DeAndre Hopkins : WR : Clemson
28. Denver :: Johnthan Banks : CB : Mississippi State
29. New England :: Logan Ryan : CB : Rutgers
30. Atlanta :: Tyler Eifert : TE : Notre Dame
31. Baltimore :: Manti Te’o : LB : Notre Dame
32. San Francisco :: Jesse Williams : DL : Alabama

[D-Unit]

Well Jerry Jones did say he would make this an uncomfortable offseason for the existing regime... Fire Rob Ryan, take away play calling from Garrett, and now drafting Romo's replacement.... You may be right here! :)

[T-RICH49]

no flaw with KC's pick

[Babylon]

Seatte

Tackle not really a need unless you would play Fluker at G, with Carpenter being worked there not sure that is pressing.

Would be shocked if Arizona doesn't go Barkevious Mingo with having to play Wilson and Kaepernick 4 times a year. The way your mock shakes out they can get a Lane Johnson or a Kyle Long in the 2nd. No charge to Cards fans for the free advice.

[princefielder28]

Originally Posted by Babylon

Seatte

Tackle not really a need unless you would play Fluker at G, with Carpenter being worked there not sure that is pressing.

Would be shocked if Arizona doesn't go Barkevious Mingo with having to play Wilson and Kaepernick 4 times a year. The way your mock shakes out they can get a Lane Johnson or a Kyle Long in the 2nd. No charge to Cards fans for the free advice.

What would you suggest for Seattle then? It seems in every single mock I do for them it's off no matter who I give them or which position I throw out there for round one.

And for Arizona it's easy to say go tackle given the way the board shaped up, but the draft doesn't work that way...with the way the top six picks went the best player for Arizona would be Eric Fisher because they need to be able to protect their quarterback

[Babylon]

Originally Posted by princefielder28

What would you suggest for Seattle then? It seems in every single mock I do for them it's off no matter who I give them or which position I throw out there for round one.

And for Arizona it's easy to say go tackle given the way the board shaped up, but the draft doesn't work that way...with the way the top six picks went the best player for Arizona would be Eric Fisher because they need to be able to protect their quarterback

they seem to need more help at WR and with the pass rush.

[Abaddon]

3. Oakland :: Ezekiel Ansah : DE : Brigham Young

Dafooq is dis?

[Robcards]

Jacksonville would light a match to a #2 pick like that but I don't think their new GM is a paste eater

[princefielder28]

Originally Posted by Babylon

they seem to need more help at WR and with the pass rush.

They do need help at receiver, but I don't know if it's a first round need for them. With the way the board played out defensive end wasn't an appealing option but a penetrating defensive tackle like Short could've been a possibility; I don't think he's a first round guy though.

Originally Posted by Abaddon

Dafooq is dis?

I saw it in TACKLE's mock the other day and I agree with the thought process. Ansah is a disruptive force while being extremely raw and possesses a terrific work ethic. He's a guy with a high ceiling and has a better chance to hit that potential thanks to the effort he'll put forth.

[Abaddon]

You make a good sales pitch. Still, I'd be somewhat surprised to see him go so high.

[49erNation85]

Love the pick for sf.

[thebow305]

EXCELLENT Miami pick!

[SickwithIt1010]

I could dig it.

[killxswitch]

I see more and more these fatties going to Indy. We don't need a NT, definitely not in the 1st. We need OL (guard mainly), OLB, and 5 tech.

[Robcards]

Originally Posted by killxswitch

I see more and more these fatties going to Indy. We don't need a NT, definitely not in the 1st. We need OL (guard mainly), OLB, and 5 tech.

Redding is the only halfway decent player on that front 3. I wouldn't say DL isn't a need for the Colts. Hopefully Chapman gets healthy and works out, but that's just being hopeful.

[killxswitch]

Originally Posted by Robcards

Redding is the only halfway decent player on that front 3. I wouldn't say DL isn't a need for the Colts. Hopefully Chapman gets healthy and works out, but that's just being hopeful.

Like I said, 5 tech. We're getting Chapman and McKinney back next year which is like two brand new players. A rotation of those two, Antonio Johnson, and Martin Tevaseu should be fine. We need DEs, not NTs.

[rodgers 4 mvp]

Solid Green Bay draft

[Robcards]

Originally Posted by killxswitch

Like I said, 5 tech. We're getting Chapman and McKinney back next year which is like two brand new players. A rotation of those two, Antonio Johnson, and Martin Tevaseu should be fine. We need DEs, not NTs.

I don't think Hankins would necessarily be a NT in a 3 man front, I think he'd be fine at 5-tech in pagano's scheme, kind of in that ngata spot

[coordinator0]

Baltimore's pick definitely isn't a flaw. The draft position might be though. ;)

[CJSchneider]

I'll say. Give NO Monty or Hankins.

[holt_bruce81]

I love it for the Rams. Huge fan of Ertz, and Warmack is an obvious choice.

[tjsunstein]

Packers need to hit on a LB so bad.

[gpngc]

Originally Posted by princefielder28

What would you suggest for Seattle then? It seems in every single mock I do for them it's off no matter who I give them or which position I throw out there for round one.

And for Arizona it's easy to say go tackle given the way the board shaped up, but the draft doesn't work that way...with the way the top six picks went the best player for Arizona would be Eric Fisher because they need to be able to protect their quarterback

Seattle could absolutely use Fluker at RT, but I doubt they'd take ANOTHER huge Bama OT who's probably better suited as an OG (Carpenter was drafted as a RT and has since moved to OG since he couldn't handle RT). I think RT may be the pick in Rd. 1 with so many good ones available in this class. Giacomini sucks.

Here are Seattle's needs:

WR
RT
DE
WLB
Nickel CB
TE
DT (If Branch leaves via FA)
Backup QB (If Flynn is cut/traded. Carroll mentioned he wants a backup more like Wilson.)
K (If Haushka leaves via FA)

I expect them to fill at least two of those needs in FA. (Daryl Smith and Greg Jennings please)

Or trade for Percy Harvin!!!!!!

[ChicagoBearsVet23]

Bears would go Eifert or Te'o

[RCAChainGang]

Originally Posted by killxswitch

Like I said, 5 tech. We're getting Chapman and McKinney back next year which is like two brand new players. A rotation of those two, Antonio Johnson, and Martin Tevaseu should be fine. We need DEs, not NTs.

I as a fellow Colt fan approve this message.