|
|
| Pro Football Discuss professional football. |
01-31-2013, 07:51 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 3,416
Reputation: 688412
|
NFL Team Salary by position
The Guardian has developed this pretty awesome tool for us.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/inte...gland-patriots
__________________
F the 2013 draft, I just want this guy:
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJSchneider
I won't lie, I have always had a secret desire to bang a midget.
|
|
|
|
|   Sponsored Advertisement |
|   Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
01-31-2013, 11:40 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Americanzi
Posts: 14,045
Reputation: 780744
|
You really just have to laugh at the Tampa Bay offense. 4 players tying up about $43M in salaray, 3 of which are Guards, putting those 4 players at more expensive than the entire Raiders and Colts offenses. How are Tampa Bay fans not irrate over this? What a joke.
Also, Chicago with the 5th highest offensive salaries. Looking closer, giant circles for Cutler, Forte, Marshall...little tiny circles for our OL. Yup, sounds about right.
__________________
"You don't need thumbs. My best friend is my brother's dog, he doesn't have any thumbs, he's doin fine."
-Pat Angerer on breaking his thumb.
DJK = Mr. Fun-Haver
Kirk Ferentz = Coach Killjoy
|
|
|
01-31-2013, 11:43 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Legend
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 25,358
Reputation: 2361116
|
Giants are 24th on offense. Sounds about right. I hate overpaying for offensive talent. As long as we have Eli, we'll be alright. He'll make it work.
Defense is 2nd. Way too much money into one of the worst ranked defenses in the NFL. A lot of that is Perry Fewell being a turd, but it also has to do with aging players. Some bad contracts too.
__________________
Thanks BoneKrusher
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcheTen
Jason Pierre-Paul is a better and more productive player than Brandon Graham
|
|
|
|
01-31-2013, 12:26 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Reputation: 31445
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by iowatreat54
You really just have to laugh at the Tampa Bay offense. 4 players tying up about $43M in salaray, 3 of which are Guards, putting those 4 players at more expensive than the entire Raiders and Colts offenses. How are Tampa Bay fans not irrate over this? What a joke.
|
We had/have a lot of cap space, so Dominik typically frontloads deals he signs because it would be pointless to have that much cap space and not use it. Both Carl Nicks and Vincent Jackson also restructure their contracts during the last few weeks of the season. Nicks' cap figure will go from $15.436 M this year to $3.072M in 2013 while Jackson's will go from $15.43M to $3.472 M. Meanwhile, Davin Joseph cap hit will be $6M next season instead of $9.5M. While Jeremy Zuttah's (who plays center, not guard) contract doesn't have a similar frontloaded structure, he's only getting guaranteed money during the first two years of his contract. After next year, he can be easily cut without any cap penalties.
So to sumarize things, the Bucs spent a lot of money this year because they had the cap space to do so. By doing so, they saved money for the next few seasons. If/When they cut Quincy Black and Eric Wright, they have about $40M in cap room this offseason. Nicks and Jackson figures are huge, but you have to pay to get talent like that and those figures will go down. That's what Bucs fans have no worries about their cap management.
|
|
|
01-31-2013, 12:32 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Concord U
Posts: 4,779
Reputation: 267583
|
Its funny that teams like Jacksonville, Carolina, Detroit, Chicago, Tampa, Tennessee, and Kansas City are paying more for their offenses than the Saints :D
Than I see teams like Seattle, Arizona, Houston, Washington, and others spend less on defense than us :(
__________________
|
|
|
01-31-2013, 02:09 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
bhaarat316
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 13,215
Reputation: 666133
|
damnnn Steelers maybe if you spend some money on that offense it wouldn't blow.
That defense is vastly over paid as well. I really want to cut James Harrison.
But from the general looks of it, the more money that is spent on defense is well worth it. Top 7 in spending usually have the best defenses.
On the offensive side it doesn't hold true.
__________________
|
|
|
01-31-2013, 02:16 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,197
Reputation: 555748
|
Titans 2nd most expensive offense. Sounds about right, as we easily have the 2nd best offense in the league
|
|
|
01-31-2013, 03:43 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,478
Reputation: 32191
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by iowatreat54
You really just have to laugh at the Tampa Bay offense. 4 players tying up about $43M in salaray, 3 of which are Guards, putting those 4 players at more expensive than the entire Raiders and Colts offenses. How are Tampa Bay fans not irrate over this? What a joke.
Also, Chicago with the 5th highest offensive salaries. Looking closer, giant circles for Cutler, Forte, Marshall...little tiny circles for our OL. Yup, sounds about right.
|
Dude we still have 30 million in cap room. Almost 40 when we cut Black and Wright. Top 5 in cap space. So kick it. Plus we got Nicks and Vjax in FA so you know they're going to make paper.
|
|
|
01-31-2013, 05:27 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,345
Reputation: 272369
|
This is a really cool interactive web design. If you set the Colts offense up against the Broncos defense, it looks like a pee-wee team playing a highschool team lol. The Colts are paying 6.5m for their receivers, and that's their most expensive position on offense. The cheapest position on the Broncos is their defensive tackles at 5 million.
|
|
|
02-01-2013, 09:44 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 365
Reputation: 15759
|
Oakland last in defence, second last in offence, first in special teams, last in overall payroll yet they still have limited cap space. The lingering effects of Al Davis?
__________________
|
|
|
02-01-2013, 10:00 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Hall of Famer
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Not Oakland, CA
Posts: 20,148
Reputation: 1591126
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taber21
Oakland last in defence, second last in offence, first in special teams, last in overall payroll yet they still have limited cap space. The lingering effects of Al Davis?
|
Yes. A crap ton of their cap is dead cap right now. Jamarcus Russell, Kamerion Wimbley, Stanford Routt to name a few.
This offseason should have Richard Seymour, Tommy Kelly and Rolando McClain adding to that dead cap space.
The first thing I noticed what how far behind the rest of the league the Raiders were in both offense and defense.
And yes, they are well ahead of the average in ST. Lechler won't be back though.
__________________

Oldie but a goodie.
|
|
|
02-01-2013, 11:10 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 365
Reputation: 15759
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nobodyinparticular
Yes. A crap ton of their cap is dead cap right now. Jamarcus Russell, Kamerion Wimbley, Stanford Routt to name a few.
This offseason should have Richard Seymour, Tommy Kelly and Rolando McClain adding to that dead cap space.
The first thing I noticed what how far behind the rest of the league the Raiders were in both offense and defense.
And yes, they are well ahead of the average in ST. Lechler won't be back though.
|
Haha ya I know, it was a rhetorical question. My roommate is a Raiders fan so I get to here all about their terrible cap situation quite frequently, makes me laugh every time I think about it though.
__________________
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:01 PM.
|