|
|
| Mock Drafts A Place to Post and Discuss Your Own Mock Drafts |
02-02-2013, 03:59 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pillow Hat Pal
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: If we're gonna die, let's die looking like a Peruvian folk band.
Posts: 26,750
Reputation: 3028551
|
I'd cry if the 9ers ended up with Ziggy & the Seahawks got Patterson
|
|
|
|   Sponsored Advertisement |
|   Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
02-02-2013, 05:04 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bronsolino
Posts: 11,810
Reputation: 1015790
|
No chance the Giants pass on Ansah, not to mention as much as I love Hankins, we have no need for a big 2-down DT we already have Linval Joseph.
|
|
|
02-02-2013, 07:40 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 7,778
Reputation: 447981
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gpngc
Lacy is a bruising RB that can give the Rams offense a badly needed identity. He's definitely a Jeff Fisher type of player and I expect SJax to walk. Richardson's a nice player but Fisher wants to run the ball with physicality like he did during his time with Tennessee. He's always had a physical back and loves drafting them, even when he had CJ2K (LenWhale). I feel strongly about that fit and pick (especially since they have two in the first).
|
Yeah but the Rams drafted Pead in the 2nd round last year. 50th overall. Just because he didn't see the field much this season doesn't mean the Rams are done with him. And Richardson is physical.
|
|
|
02-03-2013, 12:19 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Hall of Famer
Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Not Oakland, CA
Posts: 19,682
Reputation: 1290544
|
The biggest problem (apart from the value aspect) I have with this Floyd pick is that the Raiders have a ton of 5-tech 3-4 DE-types. That's the one thing the Raiders don't need to worry about.
The Raiders need a stout NT, ILBs and multiple versatile pass rushers who can put their hand in the ground or get to the QB from a two-point stance. They need a RT, at least 1 OG, 2 CBs and they could use a TE and a WR.
All before a guy who is just going to take up space as a 3-4 DE.
__________________

Oldie but a goodie.
|
|
|
02-03-2013, 12:39 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,077
Reputation: 255302
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gpngc
This is a mock draft. I'm trying to predict what's going to happen, not copy and paste all the other Feb. mocks that are annually way, way, way off.
Floyd's a terrific prospect. It's entirely possible teams value him over Star.
|
Nevermind Star. What about the other more highly rated prospects?
Then you have the very good point made by Mr. Nip.
Just not a good pick for Oakland.
__________________
Oakland's defense has "Third Downs Syndrome." Draft accordingly.
No offense, but your Raiders draft sucks.
|
|
|
02-03-2013, 12:58 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 408
Reputation: 123659
|
THere's arguments to be made for Floyd over any of the top DL prospects I'd argue. Moore is a bit undersized, Jones has multiple red flags, Werner is a guy many aren't sold on.
Floyd is scheme versatile, good vs the run and pass, isn't out of shape or anything, has no character or injury red flags(that we know of) and competed in the best conference. He also played out of position much of the year, hidng his true value.
I wouldn't take him as high as 3, just pointing out that the top 10 or so DL in this draft are pretty bunched up IMO depending on what scheme you play and just general need and preference.
Werner,Jones,Moore,Star,FLoyd,Richardson,Mingo,Wil liams and maybe Ziggy.
|
|
|
02-03-2013, 02:37 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 7,778
Reputation: 447981
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nastradamus
THere's arguments to be made for Floyd over any of the top DL prospects I'd argue. Moore is a bit undersized, Jones has multiple red flags, Werner is a guy many aren't sold on.
Floyd is scheme versatile, good vs the run and pass, isn't out of shape or anything, has no character or injury red flags(that we know of) and competed in the best conference. He also played out of position much of the year, hidng his true value.
I wouldn't take him as high as 3, just pointing out that the top 10 or so DL in this draft are pretty bunched up IMO depending on what scheme you play and just general need and preference.
Werner,Jones,Moore,Star,FLoyd,Richardson,Mingo,Wil liams and maybe Ziggy.
|
Von Miller was around the same weight when he got drafted, and not sure how you know that about Werner.
|
|
|
02-03-2013, 03:34 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Frankfort, IN
Posts: 204
Reputation: 45067
|
Your draft order is not accurate. Plus, Matt Barkley going first? haha NO
Plus, Margus Hunt is not a first rounder. Give Indy, Sam Montgomery or Ansah.
|
|
|
02-03-2013, 04:59 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Icon
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 16,189
Reputation: 3505057
|
Nice pick for NO with Mingo.
__________________
2 C 5:6-8 Jakob Murphy aka themaninblack
|
|
|
02-03-2013, 09:27 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,077
Reputation: 255302
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nastradamus
THere's arguments to be made for Floyd over any of the top DL prospects I'd argue. Moore is a bit undersized, Jones has multiple red flags, Werner is a guy many aren't sold on.
Floyd is scheme versatile, good vs the run and pass, isn't out of shape or anything, has no character or injury red flags(that we know of) and competed in the best conference. He also played out of position much of the year, hidng his true value.
I wouldn't take him as high as 3, just pointing out that the top 10 or so DL in this draft are pretty bunched up IMO depending on what scheme you play and just general need and preference.
Werner,Jones,Moore,Star,FLoyd,Richardson,Mingo,Wil liams and maybe Ziggy.
|
Would have a very hard time stomaching taking Floyd over Joeckel.
Also wouldn't consider Jones a DL regardless of scheme.
__________________
Oakland's defense has "Third Downs Syndrome." Draft accordingly.
No offense, but your Raiders draft sucks.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 AM.
|