my scent?...like making love to a lumberjack
<TACKLE> i will ngata give you a bj raji
<+BOE> Scott, with Burfict's character concerns (whether legit or not) you think Pioli would draft him. :D
<+ScottWright> Why not. Baldwin does need a sparring partner...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hermstheman83
What's with the hate on Ricky Stanzi? Those youtube clips of him with the hulk hogan theme music instantly make him better than Luck.
Welker just flat out produces. You can talk measurable all day while he piles up catches and 1st downs. He is easy top 10.
Anyone could "produce" in his role. Anyone at all.
He's a #3 receiver on any other team. His time with the Dolphins proved as much.
And he has one of the worst 1st down catch percentages in the NFL. But when you catch 98243983428943 passes per season, you're bound to total quite a few first downs in the process, anyway.
Anyone could "produce" in his role. Anyone at all.
He's a #3 receiver on any other team. His time with the Dolphins proved as much.
And he has one of the worst 1st down catch percentages in the NFL. But when you catch 98243983428943 passes per season, you're bound to total quite a few first downs in the process, anyway.
You're getting really boring and one-dimensional. You need a new schtick. No one stays relevant telling just one joke.
You're getting really boring and one-dimensional. You need a new schtick. No one stays relevant telling just one joke.
What joke?
You actually think I'm kidding about Welker? Or anything I've posted on here?
I happen to share the same opinion with Brett Perriman when it comes to Wes Welker. If you disagree with us, that's fine. I happen to think you don't know anything about football, and your unrelenting attempts to derail my posts with snarky quips are pathetic.
You actually think I'm kidding about Welker? Or anything I've posted on here?
I happen to share the same opinion with Brett Perriman when it comes to Wes Welker. If you disagree with us, that's fine. I happen to think you don't know anything about football, and your unrelenting attempts to derail my posts with snarky quips are pathetic.
Have you thought about incorporating a rubber chicken into your act? No? ok, I guess that was pretty far out of the box...
What about just inventing some "advanced" statistics to claim that a truly horrible player is really an amazing unappreciated gem? I mean, I'd be pretty interested in laughing at a post about how Garrett Wolfe could have been a Hall of Famer if he'd been used properly. Double points if it's a CFL player no one's ever heard of!
Have you thought about incorporating a rubber chicken into your act? No? ok, I guess that was pretty far out of the box...
What about just inventing some "advanced" statistics to claim that a truly horrible player is really an amazing unappreciated gem? I mean, I'd be pretty interested in laughing at a post about how Garrett Wolfe could have been a Hall of Famer if he'd been used properly. Double points if it's a CFL player no one's ever heard of!
You're like an even more useless version of Caddy. I guess actually addressing someone's arguments is too much for you to handle...much better to be a passive-aggressive dickhead.
Hey, as long as it increases your post count, right?
You know, the real "trolls" on a forum are the ones who post non-stop in supposedly "ret@rded threads" like mine, submitting stupid, unfunny memes and thinking they're witty. How desperate for attention must you be to not be able to leave said "ret@rded threads" alone, since you clearly have nothing meaningful to say?
You're like an even more useless version of Caddy. I guess actually addressing someone's arguments is too much for you to handle...much better to be a passive-aggressive dickhead.
Hey, as long as it increases your post count, right?
You know, the real "trolls" on a forum are the ones who post non-stop in supposedly "ret@rded threads" like mine, submitting stupid, unfunny memes and thinking they're witty. How desperate for attention must you be to not be able to leave said "ret@rded threads" alone, since you clearly have nothing meaningful to say?
Jeez. If you didn't like the Garrett Wolfe idea, you could have just said so.
How about a 2000 word post in which you try to convince everyone that this is the year for Mark Sanchez to break out and take his place among the elite QBs of the league? Now THAT would be some quality trollage.
Jeez. If you didn't like the Garrett Wolfe idea, you could have just said so.
How about a 2000 word post in which you try to convince everyone that this is the year for Mark Sanchez to break out and take his place among the elite QBs of the league? Now THAT would be some quality trollage.
niel89 just said that Wes Welker is "top 10 easily," and I'm the troll?
I'll play the homer, but at the notion than Miles Austin is better than Vincent Jackson.
Austin is one of the best runners after the catch in football, in addition to being a deep threat. Can't say the same for Vincent Jackson after the catch. That's why I rate Austin higher.
I'm trying to help you with your act, man. No need to be all mean.
How about a post in which you explain how Tony Sparano was the best offensive coordinator in the game last year? That would be amazing!
Wow, Louis CK had better watch out. Aren't you just hilarious. With your memes and your amazing witz. Pretty soon, you'll be inducted into the message board Hall of Fame.
Wow, Louis CK had better watch out. Aren't you just hilarious. With your memes and your amazing witz. Pretty soon, you'll be inducted into the message board Hall of Fame.
You're like an even more useless version of Caddy. I guess actually addressing someone's arguments is too much for you to handle...much better to be a passive-aggressive dickhead.
Hey, as long as it increases your post count, right?
You know, the real "trolls" on a forum are the ones who post non-stop in supposedly "ret@rded threads" like mine, submitting stupid, unfunny memes and thinking they're witty. How desperate for attention must you be to not be able to leave said "ret@rded threads" alone, since you clearly have nothing meaningful to say?
Why would anyone bother arguing with you. You can lead a horse to water...
Why would anyone bother arguing with you. You can lead a horse to water...
You've never argued a single point with me and wouldn't even address my challenge when I told you to name one "false inference" I made in the Wes Welker thread.
You're only here to be a douche. You don't actually have anything intelligent or relevant to say.
You've never argued a single point with me and wouldn't even address my challenge when I told you to name one "false inference" I made in the Wes Welker thread.
You're only here to be a douche. You don't actually have anything intelligent or relevant to say.
That's not nice. You're not nice. You're a big ole meanie-face.
Lloyd at 20.
Nelson at 40.
Cecil Shorts listed at all.
Cecil Shorts was quite good this year. He deserves to be in the top-50 WRs. Not that I'm agreeing with his list (Kevin Ogletree & DeNario Alexander over Welker, Miles Austin at 13. Randy Moss ranked). Jordan Taber is worse than Skip Bayless. At least Skip gets paid a boatload of money to say stupid crap.
Look at it this way, if Rodgers had Allstate instead of State Farm, he'd be protected from mayhem like this
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monomach
Brilliant letting one of Scott Pioli's henchmen have his own team to ruin. One of the premier GM jobs in the NFL and it gets handed to a stupid **** who makes three facepalm moves for every good one. Awesome. Just like handing a new Mercedes to a 16 year old girl who's already been in three wrecks.