I forget how well Watt did, but he's certainly a monster physically and his strength is worth accolade. Apart from that, I hope you're not letting his NFL success dictate your view. Watt had great tape, and if he put on a combine performance that rivals the best going back decades, then he's a Top 3 pick. Instead, he went 11th. Perhaps I'm just misremembering, but I'd choose Pep between the two.
No, he's very accurate about Watt. I remember looking at Watt's numbers and thinking they were almost something unhuman. He ran in the 4.7-4.8 range and had the best 3-cone and shuttle times of all linemen. He was a freak in all regards, and it shows in the NFL. I hate to think his athleticism was underrated because he's white.
That's great and Ware is a great choice; however, the question pretained to players when they were draft prospects, not after they were NFL players.
But I do have question for everyone. I wonder how Bruce Smith's numbers and measurables coming out stack up to those of the freaks of the last couple decades?
Bruce Smith was a 300+# DT prospect when he was drafted 1/1 out of Va Tech. He got himself into elite condition in Buffalo, dropped about 35# and transformed into a HOFer.
Careful with using electronic times versus watch times. Most of the older guys being mentioned had the luxury of being timed on a stopwatch. For hand-times round up to the nearest tenth then add 0.24.
This is why guys trust their own hand-held times.
We've seen video evidence where electronic times were straight-up WRONG. Yet it is assumed that an electronic timing is more than a quarter second more accurate?
4.46 becomes 4.74???? Come on.
I realize it isn't your conversion, Trogdor, I'm just making an open-minded observation.
Some years back there was a prospect out of Kansas that put up better combine numbers than Shawn Merriman. I can't remember the exact numbers or his height/weight, but his name was David McMillan. The Browns took him in the 5th round and he was a complete turd.
I was fresh out of high school then and didn't have much experience with the draft and David McMillan was the prospect that taught me athletic numbers are not even half of what makes a great player.
We've seen video evidence where electronic times were straight-up WRONG. Yet it is assumed that an electronic timing is more than a quarter second more accurate?
4.46 becomes 4.74???? Come on.
I realize it isn't your conversion, Trogdor, I'm just making an open-minded observation.
Well for what it's worth every major track and field body uses electronic timing as do speed sticks and anything else you need to hold up in court. Electronic times have gotten a lot more accurate since their inception but you cannot cast doubt on electronic times without casting a bigger shadow on hand timings.
As I said you can't compare combine numbers which are the "official" with pro-day numbers due to electronic versus hand-timed. Numerous times a prospect goes from being a "legit" 4.3 guy on grass guy runs a 4.5 on the super track at the combine.
Well for what it's worth every major track and field body uses electronic timing as do speed sticks and anything else you need to hold up in court. Electronic times have gotten a lot more accurate since their inception but you cannot cast doubt on electronic times without casting a bigger shadow on hand timings.
As I said you can't compare combine numbers which are the "official" with pro-day numbers due to electronic versus hand-timed. Numerous times a prospect goes from being a "legit" 4.3 guy on grass guy runs a 4.5 on the super track at the combine.
Well for what it's worth every major track and field body uses electronic timing as do speed sticks and anything else you need to hold up in court. Electronic times have gotten a lot more accurate since their inception but you cannot cast doubt on electronic times without casting a bigger shadow on hand timings.
As I said you can't compare combine numbers which are the "official" with pro-day numbers due to electronic versus hand-timed. Numerous times a prospect goes from being a "legit" 4.3 guy on grass guy runs a 4.5 on the super track at the combine.
I don't disagree. However, the issue with hand-times are inconsistency. If inconsistent, we shouldn't be able to assume that the conversion should always be .24+ added. That's all I'm saying.
Hand-timed A) 4.46 = 4.74
Hand-timed B) 4.57 = 4.84
"Official" Electronic time = 4.64
Careful with using electronic times versus watch times. Most of the older guys being mentioned had the luxury of being timed on a stopwatch. For hand-times round up to the nearest tenth then add 0.24.
That's generally more useful for track which uses fully automatic timing. NFL use partially-automatic so that .24 reaction time add-on isn't accurate.
Some years back there was a prospect out of Kansas that put up better combine numbers than Shawn Merriman. I can't remember the exact numbers or his height/weight, but his name was David McMillan. The Browns took him in the 5th round and he was a complete turd.
I was fresh out of high school then and didn't have much experience with the draft and David McMillan was the prospect that taught me athletic numbers are not even half of what makes a great player.
David was a college teammate of mine, 6'3"/262#, ran 4.58 at the combine. In his defense he was a 'tweener in the NFL and would've needed to have added 20 pounds or so to play DE.
No, he's very accurate about Watt. I remember looking at Watt's numbers and thinking they were almost something unhuman. He ran in the 4.7-4.8 range and had the best 3-cone and shuttle times of all linemen. He was a freak in all regards, and it shows in the NFL. I hate to think his athleticism was underrated because he's white.
Eric Decker & Peyton Hillis hate to think so too.
__________________ "Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they've made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem"
-- President Ronald Reagan, 1985
Combine numbers aside, nobody could move like Peppers at that size.
Since it was so long ago, probly a lot of people here aren't aware that he played, and played well, for the Tar Heels... basketball team.
The best program and conference in the country at that time, and there he was.
He was special.
And a great player in the NFL even if not "legendary" like some expected.
__________________ "Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they've made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem"
-- President Ronald Reagan, 1985
I hate to think his athleticism was underrated because he's white.
But that's exactly what happened. It happens every year. People said Kuechly would run a 4.8 and Burfict would run a 4.5. Kerrigan was not considered an athletic player despite his good numbers at the Combine. White receivers are slot receivers and the next Wes Welker. That's how it goes. J.J. Watt could have been a top 5 pick if he were not a big, white dude being labeled as the next Adam Carriker.
But that's exactly what happened. It happens every year. People said Kuechly would run a 4.8 and Burfict would run a 4.5. Kerrigan was not considered an athletic player despite his good numbers at the Combine. White receivers are slot receivers and the next Wes Welker. That's how it goes. J.J. Watt could have been a top 5 pick if he were not a big, white dude being labeled as the next Adam Carriker.
Then again the last time they gave credit to a white WR being athletic and possible playmaker, his name was Matt Jones....and we all know how that went...jeez...
__________________
Fear the Spear - Winston Era has begun....
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeJoeBrown
The FSU speed thing is a joke.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bosanac01
I haven't stopped drinking yet though.Baller gave me the best advice.
I hate to think his athleticism was underrated because he's white.
someone made a thread (or posted in one i cant remember) asking this exact question before that draft. He compared Watts numbers and triangle numbers to Mario and they were pretty damn close. I'm not sure why Watt wasnt taken a little higher, need maybe? i dont feel like looking it up he still went 11th not like he fell to the 5th round.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thumper/JBCX/Bixby
Orton will never be in the same class as the Drew Brees or the Peyton Mannings or the Tom Bradys of the world. Kevin Kolb has the potential to be that kind of player.
I was like 11 when Peppers got drafted. I remember watching that draft and seeing Peppers get taken #2 and was like "wait, you mean the basketball player Peppers???"