|
|
| Pro Football Discuss professional football. |
07-31-2006, 07:30 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cunningham06
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by yourfavestoner
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vikings Fan
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by draftguru151
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vikings Fan
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by draftguru151
What is that over?
|
huh? |
Is that career, last 4 years, what? |
career would be unfair to Tiki so it was last 4 years for the TDs and Yards per season. |
Well, let's do it over the past two seasons, as they are the most recent and are the years Portis was out of that godly Denver running game.
Carries per fumble:
Portis: 86
Barber: 113
TD per Carry:
Portis: 43
Barber: 30
Carry per Carry 20+ yards:
Ports: 63
Barber: 30
YPC:
Portis: 4.05
Barber: 4.95
TD/Season:
Portis: 8
Barber: 11
Age:
Portis
Barber
Yards per Season:
Portis: 1415
Barber: 1689
As you can see, over the past two years, it hasn't even been close. This isn't even counting receiving stats, where Barber has practically doubled Portis' numbers.
Like I said, Portis gets the edge in age, and that's about it. |
Good post. Tiki has been better than Portis the last couple of seasons when their lines have been similar as opposed to how much better Denvers run offense was than the Giants. Portis is the better long term back because he has more years left in him. |
People just throw the fact that Portis was in a power running system out the window dont they...... |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Advertisement |
| Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
|
07-31-2006, 07:32 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
The Juggernaut
Legend
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 22,069
Reputation: 369108
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SeanTaylor21
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cunningham06
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by yourfavestoner
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vikings Fan
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by draftguru151
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vikings Fan
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by draftguru151
What is that over?
|
huh? |
Is that career, last 4 years, what? |
career would be unfair to Tiki so it was last 4 years for the TDs and Yards per season. |
Well, let's do it over the past two seasons, as they are the most recent and are the years Portis was out of that godly Denver running game.
Carries per fumble:
Portis: 86
Barber: 113
TD per Carry:
Portis: 43
Barber: 30
Carry per Carry 20+ yards:
Ports: 63
Barber: 30
YPC:
Portis: 4.05
Barber: 4.95
TD/Season:
Portis: 8
Barber: 11
Age:
Portis
Barber
Yards per Season:
Portis: 1415
Barber: 1689
As you can see, over the past two years, it hasn't even been close. This isn't even counting receiving stats, where Barber has practically doubled Portis' numbers.
Like I said, Portis gets the edge in age, and that's about it. |
Good post. Tiki has been better than Portis the last couple of seasons when their lines have been similar as opposed to how much better Denvers run offense was than the Giants. Portis is the better long term back because he has more years left in him. |
People just throw the fact that Portis was in a power running system out the window dont they...... |
I don't get that argument. Can't you say that Larry Johnson was in a power running system.
__________________
|
|
|
|
07-31-2006, 07:37 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
All-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,595
Reputation: 5546
|
It's Portis by far for me.
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2006, 07:51 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jughead10
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SeanTaylor21
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cunningham06
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by yourfavestoner
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vikings Fan
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by draftguru151
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vikings Fan
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by draftguru151
What is that over?
|
huh? |
Is that career, last 4 years, what? |
career would be unfair to Tiki so it was last 4 years for the TDs and Yards per season. |
Well, let's do it over the past two seasons, as they are the most recent and are the years Portis was out of that godly Denver running game.
Carries per fumble:
Portis: 86
Barber: 113
TD per Carry:
Portis: 43
Barber: 30
Carry per Carry 20+ yards:
Ports: 63
Barber: 30
YPC:
Portis: 4.05
Barber: 4.95
TD/Season:
Portis: 8
Barber: 11
Age:
Portis
Barber
Yards per Season:
Portis: 1415
Barber: 1689
As you can see, over the past two years, it hasn't even been close. This isn't even counting receiving stats, where Barber has practically doubled Portis' numbers.
Like I said, Portis gets the edge in age, and that's about it. |
Good post. Tiki has been better than Portis the last couple of seasons when their lines have been similar as opposed to how much better Denvers run offense was than the Giants. Portis is the better long term back because he has more years left in him. |
People just throw the fact that Portis was in a power running system out the window dont they...... |
I don't get that argument. Can't you say that Larry Johnson was in a power running system. |
The argument is that portis is not built for a power running game, its the complete opposite of his ablities yet he still did a good job. |
|
|
|
|
07-31-2006, 01:27 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
#1 Vickscuser
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LakerLand
Posts: 13,133
Reputation: 628697
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SeanTaylor21
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jughead10
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SeanTaylor21
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cunningham06
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by yourfavestoner
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vikings Fan
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by draftguru151
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vikings Fan
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by draftguru151
What is that over?
|
huh? |
Is that career, last 4 years, what? |
career would be unfair to Tiki so it was last 4 years for the TDs and Yards per season. |
Well, let's do it over the past two seasons, as they are the most recent and are the years Portis was out of that godly Denver running game.
Carries per fumble:
Portis: 86
Barber: 113
TD per Carry:
Portis: 43
Barber: 30
Carry per Carry 20+ yards:
Ports: 63
Barber: 30
YPC:
Portis: 4.05
Barber: 4.95
TD/Season:
Portis: 8
Barber: 11
Age:
Portis
Barber
Yards per Season:
Portis: 1415
Barber: 1689
As you can see, over the past two years, it hasn't even been close. This isn't even counting receiving stats, where Barber has practically doubled Portis' numbers.
Like I said, Portis gets the edge in age, and that's about it. |
Good post. Tiki has been better than Portis the last couple of seasons when their lines have been similar as opposed to how much better Denvers run offense was than the Giants. Portis is the better long term back because he has more years left in him. |
People just throw the fact that Portis was in a power running system out the window dont they...... |
I don't get that argument. Can't you say that Larry Johnson was in a power running system. |
The argument is that portis is not built for a power running game, its the complete opposite of his ablities yet he still did a good job. |
That just proves my point even further. Barber is even smaller than Portis and has done better in a power running scheme. Now just imagine what Barber would do in two years in Denver. |
|
|
|
|
07-31-2006, 01:34 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by yourfavestoner
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SeanTaylor21
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jughead10
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SeanTaylor21
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cunningham06
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by yourfavestoner
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vikings Fan
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by draftguru151
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vikings Fan
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by draftguru151
What is that over?
|
huh? |
Is that career, last 4 years, what? |
career would be unfair to Tiki so it was last 4 years for the TDs and Yards per season. |
Well, let's do it over the past two seasons, as they are the most recent and are the years Portis was out of that godly Denver running game.
Carries per fumble:
Portis: 86
Barber: 113
TD per Carry:
Portis: 43
Barber: 30
Carry per Carry 20+ yards:
Ports: 63
Barber: 30
YPC:
Portis: 4.05
Barber: 4.95
TD/Season:
Portis: 8
Barber: 11
Age:
Portis
Barber
Yards per Season:
Portis: 1415
Barber: 1689
As you can see, over the past two years, it hasn't even been close. This isn't even counting receiving stats, where Barber has practically doubled Portis' numbers.
Like I said, Portis gets the edge in age, and that's about it. |
Good post. Tiki has been better than Portis the last couple of seasons when their lines have been similar as opposed to how much better Denvers run offense was than the Giants. Portis is the better long term back because he has more years left in him. |
People just throw the fact that Portis was in a power running system out the window dont they...... |
I don't get that argument. Can't you say that Larry Johnson was in a power running system. |
The argument is that portis is not built for a power running game, its the complete opposite of his ablities yet he still did a good job. |
That just proves my point even further. Barber is even smaller than Portis and has done better in a power running scheme. Now just imagine what Barber would do in two years in Denver. |
Um, barber plays in a cutback running scheme what are you talking about? |
|
|
|
|
07-31-2006, 01:40 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
#1 Vickscuser
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LakerLand
Posts: 13,133
Reputation: 628697
|
The majority of the Giants running plays are powers, traps, and counters. That's what I'm talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2006, 01:42 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
The Juggernaut
Legend
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 22,069
Reputation: 369108
|
There is a difference between playing in a cutback running scheme, and a running back making cuts to avoid defenders. Tiki just has a knack for never taking a hard hit.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2006, 01:45 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
#1 Vickscuser
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LakerLand
Posts: 13,133
Reputation: 628697
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jughead10
There is a difference between playing in a cutback running scheme, and a running back making cuts to avoid defenders. Tiki just has a knack for never taking a hard hit.
|
Exactly. The only scheme that can actually be designated as a "cutback" scheme is one with an emphasis in zone blocking. |
|
|
|
|
07-31-2006, 02:27 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Neo Geo (Moderator)
Icon
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: California
Posts: 17,522
Reputation: 23650
|
CP gets my vote.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:04 AM.
|
