|
|
| Pro Football Discuss professional football. |
09-17-2006, 08:05 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Icon
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: :3
Posts: 17,552
Reputation: 466188
|
Quote:
|
I mean they did play with Seattle.
|
That was due to their defense, not their offense. They only scored 6 points.
__________________

by BoneKrusher
Quote:
|
<TheUnseen> Drunken Canadian Bastard: There's an APS for that
|
|
|
|
|   Sponsored Advertisement |
|   Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
09-17-2006, 08:05 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
|
Chicago, Pittsburgh, Baltimore, San Diego, Seattle
|
|
|
|
09-17-2006, 08:06 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
The Professor (Hall of Famer)
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 34,312
Reputation: 1571106
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sweetness34
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Unseen
Not sure right now. Ravens, Bears, and Chargers are impressive so far, but all against bad teams so far.
|
Detroit is not a bad team. They're an average team and I'll keep saying that.
I mean they did play with Seattle.
They're a solid offensive team and a solid defensive team.
|
The Lions are a below average team. If by average we're saying the 13th to 19th best team in the NFL. The Dolphins, for example, are an average team.
__________________
Nobody cares about your stupid fantasy team.
|
|
|
09-17-2006, 08:12 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 298
Reputation: 10
|
Baltimore is looking very intimidating right now, while the Bears are struggling to get consistent pressure on the QB, the defensive backfield isn't gelling quite yet (though it seems to be improved over last year), and the unit as a whole isn't tackling well.
The homer in me says Bears.
The objective, rational part of me says you can't decide after just two games. Maybe after four. There's just not enough of a sample to make a determination yet. On stats alone, I think it's the Ravens.
Though Pittsburgh and San Diego are looking very good, I think Baltimore and Chicago are a big step above the rest of the league. Which, come to think of it, is how it should be.
__________________
|
|
|
09-17-2006, 08:14 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
|
Baltimore looks good, but they played two teams who are really are struggling on offense. Oakland and Tampa Bays O-Lines have been dismal. Now I'm not saying they're bad, but I wanna see them versus a top tier opponent. THe same could be said about Chicago, but the difference is they proved themselves last year.
I have Pitt ahead of Baltimore still, Lebeau's scheme works wonders, and is constantly bringing pressure, forcing turnovers and I think is second only to the bears
|
|
|
|
09-17-2006, 08:16 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
The Professor (Hall of Famer)
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 34,312
Reputation: 1571106
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IBleedNavyandOrange
Baltimore is looking very intimidating right now, while the Bears are struggling to get consistent pressure on the QB, the defensive backfield isn't gelling quite yet (though it seems to be improved over last year), and the unit as a whole isn't tackling well.
The homer in me says Bears.
The objective, rational part of me says you can't decide after just two games. Maybe after four. There's just not enough of a sample to make a determination yet. On stats alone, I think it's the Ravens.
Though Pittsburgh and San Diego are looking very good, I think Baltimore and Chicago are a big step above the rest of the league. Which, come to think of it, is how it should be.
|
I don't understand this pressure argument. We have 9 sacks in 2 games. How much pressure do you want? They were in both Favre and Kitna's faces the last two weeks.
__________________
Nobody cares about your stupid fantasy team.
|
|
|
09-17-2006, 09:59 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,773
Reputation: 260333
|
With as little homerism as I can use....I'm taking Seattle.
__________________
|
|
|
09-17-2006, 10:02 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Icon
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,144
Reputation: 220179
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by draftguru151
1. Bears
2. Chargers
3. Baltimore
One team that no one said is Pittsburgh. They have a great run D, and pass D is darn good too.
|
same top 3 but for now I'd have baltimore over SD
__________________
|
|
|
09-17-2006, 10:06 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 11,267
Reputation: 1269
|
Chicago for 2 reasons.
1-Depth
2-Strong play in the trenches
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul
Eli's opportunity to become a legend.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vikes99ej
These last 50 seconds will define Eli Manning.
|
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED
|
|
|
09-17-2006, 10:14 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bearsfan_51
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IBleedNavyandOrange
Baltimore is looking very intimidating right now, while the Bears are struggling to get consistent pressure on the QB, the defensive backfield isn't gelling quite yet (though it seems to be improved over last year), and the unit as a whole isn't tackling well.
The homer in me says Bears.
The objective, rational part of me says you can't decide after just two games. Maybe after four. There's just not enough of a sample to make a determination yet. On stats alone, I think it's the Ravens.
Though Pittsburgh and San Diego are looking very good, I think Baltimore and Chicago are a big step above the rest of the league. Which, come to think of it, is how it should be.
|
I don't understand this pressure argument. We have 9 sacks in 2 games. How much pressure do you want? They were in both Favre and Kitna's faces the last two weeks.
|
Both of those offensive lines are terrible though. I'll know if they're good when they face Minnesota. Especially the left side with Hutchinson and McKinnie.
|
|
|
|
09-17-2006, 10:16 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Soldier Field
Posts: 19,378
Reputation: 71208
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by intergalacticspacemonkey
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bearsfan_51
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IBleedNavyandOrange
Baltimore is looking very intimidating right now, while the Bears are struggling to get consistent pressure on the QB, the defensive backfield isn't gelling quite yet (though it seems to be improved over last year), and the unit as a whole isn't tackling well.
The homer in me says Bears.
The objective, rational part of me says you can't decide after just two games. Maybe after four. There's just not enough of a sample to make a determination yet. On stats alone, I think it's the Ravens.
Though Pittsburgh and San Diego are looking very good, I think Baltimore and Chicago are a big step above the rest of the league. Which, come to think of it, is how it should be.
|
I don't understand this pressure argument. We have 9 sacks in 2 games. How much pressure do you want? They were in both Favre and Kitna's faces the last two weeks.
|
Both of those offensive lines are terrible though. I'll know if they're good when they face Minnesota. Especially the left side with Hutchinson and McKinnie.
|
What do you mean "you'll know if we're good"? Our defense proved it last season. We don't need to "prove" anything. We just need to play better.
We were a top 3 defense last season.
__________________
Another sig courtesy of BoneKrusher
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBCX
Despite looking better against an underachieving Eagles team, I still think the Bears are one of the worst teams in the NFL. I smell a blowout victory by the Lions this week and a division sweep.
|
|
|
|
09-17-2006, 10:18 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Madison
Posts: 8,333
Reputation: 87852
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by XxXdragonXxX
With as little homerism as I can use....I'm taking Seattle.
|
yea... well if that's the smallest amount you can use... then ST21 may not be the biggest homer on this site.
__________________
Sig by me... Hold the applause.
|
|
|
09-17-2006, 10:27 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,773
Reputation: 260333
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by VoteLynnSwan
yea... well if that's the smallest amount you can use... then ST21 may not be the biggest homer on this site.
|
You'll see.
__________________
|
|
|
09-17-2006, 10:33 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Head Moderator
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Florida
Posts: 30,221
Reputation: 807608
|
The Bears' secondary is suspect right now, imo. They played pretty good, but not great against the Packers. They also let Jon Kitna shred them for 3 quarters, but I give them props for not letting up a TD. But the best front 7 in football will make up for the suspect secondary. I think they have the best with Baltimore, Carolina (when healthy), and San Diego not too far behind.
__________________
|
|
|
09-17-2006, 10:35 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Soldier Field
Posts: 19,378
Reputation: 71208
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Patriots-Lions
The Bears' secondary is suspect right now, imo. They played pretty good, but not great against the Packers. They also let Jon Kitna shred them for 3 quarters, but I give them props for not letting up a TD. But the best front 7 in football will make up for the suspect secondary. I think they have the best with Baltimore, Carolina (when healthy), and San Diego not too far behind.
|
From what it looked like to me, we played a soft cover 2. We allowed a lot in front of us but nothing behind. Probably in fear that Roy might get behind us.
With that being said though, our pass defense wasn't good. Too many open guys for my taste and no INT's.
Oh well, I'll take a 7 point score from the opponent any week.
__________________
Another sig courtesy of BoneKrusher
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBCX
Despite looking better against an underachieving Eagles team, I still think the Bears are one of the worst teams in the NFL. I smell a blowout victory by the Lions this week and a division sweep.
|
|
|
|
09-17-2006, 10:36 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: BIG ORANGE COUNTRY
Posts: 6,365
Reputation: 18165
|
Chicago
__________________

BoneKrusher
|
|
|
09-17-2006, 10:48 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Hall of Famer
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Not Oakland, CA
Posts: 20,147
Reputation: 1591126
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gribble
San Diego for me. Amazing pressure with their front three and linebackers.
|
But their secondary sucks... Once they find a matchup against a good offensive line, they can get beaten deep pretty easily.
All in all though, they definitely have played very well this season. I'd just like to see them in a real test.
__________________

Oldie but a goodie.
|
|
|
09-17-2006, 11:19 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bolingbrook, Illinois
Posts: 2,933
Reputation: 2310
|
I believe in Baltimore.
__________________
I remember: Sean Taylor

Bosanac01
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 01:02 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: :noitacoL
Posts: 3,328
Reputation: 581
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sweetness34
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by danman253
Seattle isn't the best, but they deserve to be an option.
|
Agreed....
|
I voted Chicago, but we've only allowed one touchdown too, and it was a garbage TD.
__________________

Sig by rainbeaukid2
Quote:
Originally Posted by yodachu
Everyone pwns the Rams.
|
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 01:19 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cylon-occupied Earth
Posts: 12,147
Reputation: 814752
|
The top defensive teams...Chicago, Chargers and Ravens have played nobody yet.
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 01:34 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canton 2013
Posts: 4,226
Reputation: 1801
|
Ravens stats in 2 weeks
Interception - 6
Fumbles - 5
Sacks - 9
Tackles - 114
(49 Tackles - Week One)
(65 Tackles - Week Two)
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 01:38 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Hall of Famer
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Not Oakland, CA
Posts: 20,147
Reputation: 1591126
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by psub10champs
Baltimore looks good, but they played two teams who are really are struggling on offense. Oakland and Tampa Bays O-Lines have been dismal. Now I'm not saying they're bad, but I wanna see them versus a top tier opponent. THe same could be said about Chicago, but the difference is they proved themselves last year.
I have Pitt ahead of Baltimore still, Lebeau's scheme works wonders, and is constantly bringing pressure, forcing turnovers and I think is second only to the bears
|
Baltimore's offense looked horrid today against the Raiders. I mean downright pathetic.
__________________

Oldie but a goodie.
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 01:40 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canton 2013
Posts: 4,226
Reputation: 1801
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nobodyinparticular
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by psub10champs
Baltimore looks good, but they played two teams who are really are struggling on offense. Oakland and Tampa Bays O-Lines have been dismal. Now I'm not saying they're bad, but I wanna see them versus a top tier opponent. THe same could be said about Chicago, but the difference is they proved themselves last year.
I have Pitt ahead of Baltimore still, Lebeau's scheme works wonders, and is constantly bringing pressure, forcing turnovers and I think is second only to the bears
|
Baltimore's offense looked horrid today against the Raiders. I mean downright pathetic.
|
i dont thinks so i think that the raiders defence just look amazing
i think the raiders defence is good
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 01:49 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 6,730
Reputation: 56147
|
Baltimore will be hard to go past now they've got a decent offense.
I think the top 5 will round out like this:
Chicago
Carolina
Tampa
Baltimore
Denver
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 01:52 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canton 2013
Posts: 4,226
Reputation: 1801
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BlindSite
Baltimore will be hard to go past now they've got a decent offense.
I think the top 5 will round out like this:
Chicago
Carolina
Tampa
Baltimore
Denver
|
i think they have some much confidence thats what is making the defence so good (also that great dline)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:38 PM.
|