|
|
| Pro Football Discuss professional football. |
10-16-2006, 12:54 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bulimia twice the taste less calories
Posts: 3,467
Reputation: 49
|
I was expecting a blow out last night around the ball park of 35-3. They didn't play that bad last night, besides the run d.
__________________
Thanks to jackalope
|
|
|
|   Sponsored Advertisement |
|   Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
10-16-2006, 01:32 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 596
Reputation: 354
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by portermvp84
I was expecting a blow out last night around the ball park of 35-3. They didn't play that bad last night, besides the run d.
|
i thought raiders held broncos under 100 yards rushing if im not correct i think thats good dont u think?
|
|
|
10-16-2006, 02:13 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 23 Meteor Street
Posts: 6,542
Reputation: 35254
|
Maybe, they're bound to win one.
__________________
BoneKrusher
|
|
|
10-16-2006, 02:49 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Hall of Famer
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Not Oakland, CA
Posts: 20,147
Reputation: 1591126
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by drowe
I'm gonna say no, and I'd REALLY like to see a 'perfect season'
they have NOTHING going for 'em. and they play in a tough division.
|
That's where you and everyone else are wrong. The Raiders have a young and emerging defense that's really playing well this year. They still need to keep their heads high and stay injury free, but so far they're playing pretty well. Nowhere near Bears/Chargers/Ravens level this year, but they're all young and they are growing.
__________________

Oldie but a goodie.
|
|
|
10-16-2006, 02:56 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,103
Reputation: 13
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nobodyinparticular
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by drowe
I'm gonna say no, and I'd REALLY like to see a 'perfect season'
they have NOTHING going for 'em. and they play in a tough division.
|
That's where you and everyone else are wrong. The Raiders have a young and emerging defense that's really playing well this year. They still need to keep their heads high and stay injury free, but so far they're playing pretty well. Nowhere near Bears/Chargers/Ravens level this year, but they're all young and they are growing.
|
this is exactly what i find funy...you list Bears ravens and chargers...but no broncos...it could be that you are a raiders fan and hate broncos...but the broncos get no respect :?
__________________
|
|
|
10-16-2006, 02:59 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,270
Reputation: 4161
|
yep...
Yah I would take the Broncos D over any D in the league with the exception of Chicago and maybe Jax/Carolina. They are playing pretty awesome.
|
|
|
10-16-2006, 02:59 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nobodyinparticular
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by drowe
I'm gonna say no, and I'd REALLY like to see a 'perfect season'
they have NOTHING going for 'em. and they play in a tough division.
|
That's where you and everyone else are wrong. The Raiders have a young and emerging defense that's really playing well this year. They still need to keep their heads high and stay injury free, but so far they're playing pretty well. Nowhere near Bears/Chargers/Ravens level this year, but they're all young and they are growing.
|
That Sapp, he really is a young up and comer.
Just bustin chops, I know what you mean.
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006, 04:12 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,988
Reputation: 55721
|
they're bound to win at least once. even if they're the worst team they've got to get lucky one time.
have there ever been any winless teams before
__________________
Sig thanks to mockalicious
|
|
|
10-17-2006, 04:16 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jackalope
they're bound to win at least once. even if they're the worst team they've got to get lucky one time.
have there ever been any winless teams before
|
The Bucs went undefeated in the 80's I believe but that was a 14 game season
|
|
|
|
10-18-2006, 11:08 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bulimia twice the taste less calories
Posts: 3,467
Reputation: 49
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cardsalltheway
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jackalope
they're bound to win at least once. even if they're the worst team they've got to get lucky one time.
have there ever been any winless teams before
|
The Bucs went undefeated in the 80's I believe but that was a 14 game season
|
Yeah but this is a 16 game season big difference.
__________________
Thanks to jackalope
|
|
|
10-18-2006, 03:03 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bulimia twice the taste less calories
Posts: 3,467
Reputation: 49
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kurve
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by portermvp84
I was expecting a blow out last night around the ball park of 35-3. They didn't play that bad last night, besides the run d.
|
i thought raiders held broncos under 100 yards rushing if im not correct i think thats good dont u think?
|
Thats a first that will never happen again.
__________________
Thanks to jackalope
|
|
|
10-18-2006, 03:06 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
|
The Raiders will win a game this year don't worry. They can beat Arizona and Houston for sure, and I think they can beat the inconsistent Chiefs.
|
|
|
|
10-18-2006, 03:40 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Shoryuken
Posts: 13,704
Reputation: 406607
|
maybe they can win if they play these guys... 
__________________

What do the vikings and marijuana have in common? Every time you put them in a bowl
they get smoked.
2010-2011 Super Bowl Champions
Hint:Not the Bears.
|
|
|
10-18-2006, 06:45 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,270
Reputation: 4161
|
hehe
LOL
I heard they beat the Packers
|
|
|
10-18-2006, 07:05 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Shoryuken
Posts: 13,704
Reputation: 406607
|
Re: hehe
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Komp
LOL
I heard they beat the Packers
|
who did?
__________________

What do the vikings and marijuana have in common? Every time you put them in a bowl
they get smoked.
2010-2011 Super Bowl Champions
Hint:Not the Bears.
|
|
|
10-18-2006, 07:36 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
#1 Vickscuser
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LakerLand
Posts: 13,133
Reputation: 628697
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TitleTown088
maybe they can win if they play these guys... 
|
No, kickmikehass would easily dominate the entire Oakland team by himself.
|
|
|
10-18-2006, 07:39 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
The Professor (Hall of Famer)
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 34,312
Reputation: 1571106
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nobodyinparticular
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by drowe
I'm gonna say no, and I'd REALLY like to see a 'perfect season'
they have NOTHING going for 'em. and they play in a tough division.
|
That's where you and everyone else are wrong. The Raiders have a young and emerging defense that's really playing well this year. They still need to keep their heads high and stay injury free, but so far they're playing pretty well. Nowhere near Bears/Chargers/Ravens level this year, but they're all young and they are growing.
|
DOON'T STOP!! BELEEEEEVIN'!!! HOLD ON TO THAT FEEEEEEEELIN'!!!
__________________
Nobody cares about your stupid fantasy team.
|
|
|
10-18-2006, 07:59 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Groton, CT
Posts: 9,924
Reputation: 231523
|
They have a few games that they stand a chance in. I don't think any team will ever go 0-16. Eventually they will get lucky and make a big play like a KR, PR or INT for a TD.
__________________

BoneKrusher
|
|
|
10-18-2006, 08:12 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,830
Reputation: 27445
|
it would be very impressive if they went 0-16.... i see them winning at least 1
__________________
Go Ravens!
|
|
|
10-18-2006, 08:27 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Hall of Famer
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Not Oakland, CA
Posts: 20,147
Reputation: 1591126
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bearsfan_51
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nobodyinparticular
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by drowe
I'm gonna say no, and I'd REALLY like to see a 'perfect season'
they have NOTHING going for 'em. and they play in a tough division.
|
That's where you and everyone else are wrong. The Raiders have a young and emerging defense that's really playing well this year. They still need to keep their heads high and stay injury free, but so far they're playing pretty well. Nowhere near Bears/Chargers/Ravens level this year, but they're all young and they are growing.
|
DOON'T STOP!! BELEEEEEVIN'!!! HOLD ON TO THAT FEEEEEEEELIN'!!!
|
What's a true fan if not for a small bit of blind faith, right? If Raiders fans didn't have a little bit of faith in at least some aspect of the team, all we'd be left with as a fanbase is Crow and porter4mvp (and njx).
__________________

Oldie but a goodie.
|
|
|
10-18-2006, 10:10 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: D.C.
Posts: 238
Reputation: 10
|
Hell, I still be a Raiders fan even they went to 0-16 for the next 50 years for all i care. I still be a Raider fan no matter what.
|
|
|
10-18-2006, 10:20 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by njx9
nah, 0-16. then, they'll go 0-16 next year after shell & staff are fired and they have to learn yet another offensive system that doesn't really work. then, if all goes according to plan, they'll go 0-16 again.
eventually, they'll relocate to Prarie View.
|
dont listen to a donkey fan. 8)
|
|
|
|
10-18-2006, 10:31 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
SWDC Mafia
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ohio State University Alumni
Posts: 30,527
Reputation: 1952670
|
Anyone who says no is ridick. It's only happened once in NFL history with TB, and that was only 14 games. No way Oakland loses 16...
|
|
|
10-18-2006, 10:32 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Denver Bronco56
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nobodyinparticular
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by drowe
I'm gonna say no, and I'd REALLY like to see a 'perfect season'
they have NOTHING going for 'em. and they play in a tough division.
|
That's where you and everyone else are wrong. The Raiders have a young and emerging defense that's really playing well this year. They still need to keep their heads high and stay injury free, but so far they're playing pretty well. Nowhere near Bears/Chargers/Ravens level this year, but they're all young and they are growing.
|
this is exactly what i find funy...you list Bears ravens and chargers...but no broncos...it could be that you are a raiders fan and hate broncos...but the broncos get no respect :?
|
you know whats kind of sad about your statemnt is that the raiders had more yards offensively than the broncos.im just messin with you i know you played very conservatively in the second half.
i dont care about how good lienert did against chicago.he lost his oc wich will stir up at least a little difference in their play.we have the #1 pass defense and the cardinals have a crappy oline and we have dburgess.and a great defense.you put sands in there and he will be able to plug huge holes.that will stop the already nonexsistent running game and washington is back to cover boldin.
|
|
|
|
10-18-2006, 10:42 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Shoryuken
Posts: 13,704
Reputation: 406607
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JBond93
Anyone who says no is ridick. It's only happened once in NFL history with TB, and that was only 14 games. No way Oakland loses 16...
|
who are they going to beat?
__________________

What do the vikings and marijuana have in common? Every time you put them in a bowl
they get smoked.
2010-2011 Super Bowl Champions
Hint:Not the Bears.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 PM.
|