|
|
| Pro Football Discuss professional football. |
12-05-2006, 03:09 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: California
Posts: 343
Reputation: -649
|
Priest Holmes Vs. Marshall Faulk in PRIME?
Who would you take in there PRIME out of Faulk and Holmes...
i dont think its fair to compare stats between these two since Faulk played longer and was more productive, but who do you feel was more of a threat during there prime...
I say Faulk and i also wanted to say that Maurice Drew reminds me of Faulk a lot...watching him run into peopel lowering his shoulder and keeping his feet moving at all times, catching the ball out of the backfield as well.
|
|
|
|   Sponsored Advertisement |
|   Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
12-05-2006, 03:15 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Legend
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 25,048
Reputation: 2117925
|
I go with Faulk. Faulk in his prime was not only one of the best RBs in the game, but he was also top 3 WR in the game. He was amazing. Theres no one in the history of the game that I would want in a spread offense in the backfield ahead of him. He's the best WCO/Spread offense RB ever.
To note, before someone rips on me, Im not saying he's the best RB ever, Im saying he's the best WCO/spread offense RB ever. I think Walter Payton and Gale Sayers couldve worked in that set too, but Faulk has more experience in it, so he gets the nod.
Priest was great for that 2/3 year stint, but thats just not enough to put him in an elite category. And even then, he wasn't as good as Faulk.
__________________
Thanks D-Unit
Knicks. (10 char)
#KnicksIn2013
Carmelo Anthony is a better and more productive player than Kevin Durant
|
|
|
12-05-2006, 03:30 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,423
Reputation: 45333
|
Priest and Marshall were both great dual threat rbs with a nose for the endzone (and played in the same Coryell offense), but Faulk was better, even ignoring the longevity issue.
It would have been interesting to see Marshall play in a WCO offense, but I don't think you can say he is the best WCO rb when he never played in the WCO.
|
|
|
12-05-2006, 03:39 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Legend
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 25,048
Reputation: 2117925
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Basileus777
Priest and Marshall were both great dual threat rbs with a nose for the endzone (and played in the same Coryell offense), but Faulk was better, even ignoring the longevity issue.
It would have been interesting to see Marshall play in a WCO offense, but I don't think you can say he is the best WCO rb when he never played in the WCO.
|
I know, but you just know he'd tear it up in that too. What makes us think he wouldn't you know?
__________________
Thanks D-Unit
Knicks. (10 char)
#KnicksIn2013
Carmelo Anthony is a better and more productive player than Kevin Durant
|
|
|
12-05-2006, 04:56 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,270
Reputation: 4161
|
yah
Not really that close. An interesting one would have been Holmes vs LJ...
__________________

Sig by fenikz! Cheers!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Wright
Mr. Dukes comes from the Michael Irvin "talk loud and maybe people will think I know what I am talking about" school of football analysis.
|
|
|
|
12-05-2006, 06:34 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,652
Reputation: 83184
|
This is about as much of a no-brainer as it gets.
Priest Holmes was a product of his system.
Marshall Faulk was a special, special player who, I think, could have put up Walter Peyton-like numbers if he had been given more opportunities.
|
|
|
12-05-2006, 06:48 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: California
Posts: 343
Reputation: -649
|
so than LJ is a product of his system than too right...
|
|
|
12-05-2006, 07:02 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
:/
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: RAWR
Posts: 37,151
Reputation: 2185245
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CM4
so than LJ is a product of his system than too right...
|
That was pretty much the argument in the offseason, but no one said anything about Holmes, just Johnson, oddly enough.
I'm going with Marshall though. Always liked him more, he was amazing with the ball in his hand.
__________________

<Gaius_Baltar> That is correct comahan
<vidae> I ******* LOVE YOU DG
<njx9> <3 dg
|
|
|
12-05-2006, 07:58 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Elmhurst, IL
Posts: 175
Reputation: 10
|
both
both were great, but it's gotta be marshall.
__________________
|
|
|
12-05-2006, 08:17 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
All-Pro
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 9,455
Reputation: 197475
|
Priest Holmes was really good in his prime, Marshall was, without a shadow of a doubt, the most dangerous player in the NFL. It has to be Faulk.
|
|
|
12-05-2006, 08:22 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Shoryuken
Posts: 13,703
Reputation: 406607
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CM4
so than LJ is a product of his system than too right...
|
well i think maybe he was implying that it didn't hurt to run behind that line. Either was he was still an amazing RB.
__________________

What do the vikings and marijuana have in common? Every time you put them in a bowl
they get smoked.
2010-2011 Super Bowl Champions
Hint:Not the Bears.
|
|
|
12-05-2006, 08:28 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,828
Reputation: 1691
|
Faulk by a relatively wide margin. Holmes was good but not in the same class as Faulk. Faulk can be mentioned as one of the greatest to ever play the position where as Holmes cannot.
|
|
|
12-05-2006, 08:49 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: BIG ORANGE COUNTRY
Posts: 6,365
Reputation: 18165
|
Faulk by a mile.
__________________

BoneKrusher
|
|
|
12-05-2006, 09:26 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,830
Reputation: 27445
|
too bad priest's prime came so late in his career and didnt have as many superb years....
i would take priest, but both were blue-collar workers with incredible skills
__________________
Go Ravens!
|
|
|
12-05-2006, 09:35 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,270
Reputation: 4161
|
hmmm
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JT Jag
This is about as much of a no-brainer as it gets.
Priest Holmes was a product of his system.
Marshall Faulk was a special, special player who, I think, could have put up Walter Peyton-like numbers if he had been given more opportunities.
|
Yah I agree with you somewhat on Priest. I think he was a good RB playing behind an all-pro OL. LJ is an all-pro RB running behind a good OL. I know Chiefs fans will rip me a new one, but that is what I think. If it makes them feel better Priest is still better than any RB the Raiders have had in a long time.... 
__________________

Sig by fenikz! Cheers!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Wright
Mr. Dukes comes from the Michael Irvin "talk loud and maybe people will think I know what I am talking about" school of football analysis.
|
|
|
|
12-05-2006, 09:40 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bolingbrook, Illinois
Posts: 2,933
Reputation: 2310
|
to quote that blurbing blubbering never-finish-a-sentence-fool Chris Berman
MARSHALL! MARSHALL! MARSHALL!
__________________
I remember: Sean Taylor

Bosanac01
|
|
|
12-05-2006, 09:46 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 92
Reputation: 11365
|
__________________
| Hawkeyes || Rams || Lakers || Braves || Avalanche |
TEAM Ronnie Radke.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:36 AM.
|