Prooving a point

Originally Posted by Boston

Apparently HF has 11 usernames.

Nope, I voted for it and for good reason.

[Boston]

Originally Posted by cardsalltheway

Nope, I voted for it and for good reason.

You realize this has nothing to do with cap space, or the amount of money you would pay Holt, don't you? So you have Harrison and Wayne or Boldin and Fitzgerald, but you still can't honestly tell me you wouldn't take Holt on either one of those teams.

Originally Posted by Boston

You realize this has nothing to do with cap space, or the amount of money you would pay Holt, don't you? So you have Harrison and Wayne or Boldin and Fitzgerald, but you still can't honestly tell me you wouldn't take Holt on either one of those teams.

That was never said in the original post so when I voted, I had good reason.

[sweetness34]

Originally Posted by HawkeyeFan

Deal.

Or I'd take that Porter and Moss for Holt trade too.

You're an idiot.

[rainbeaukid2]

i would love to have holt on the niners

[yodapoop]

Originally Posted by Boston

Apparently HF has 11 usernames.

Or ten people are illirate. Even if the ? was including depth and and cap space, at least 25 teams and their fans would say hell yes. Obviously teams like the Colts, Crads, and Panthers would say no. But point is.......

Vikes have Holt, they are a playoff team.

Falcons have Holt, Vick is not only a pro-bowler, but also the Falcons are a sure playoff team.

Chiefs have Holt, their offense would be scary.

I mean I could go further, but I don't feel like it.

[sweetness34]

Originally Posted by yodachu

Or ten people are illirate. Even if the ? was including depth and and cap space, at least 25 teams and their fans would say hell yes. Obviously teams like the Colts, Crads, and Panthers would say no. But point is.......

Vikes have Holt, they are a playoff team.
Falcons have Holt, Vick is not only a pro-bowler, but also the Falcons are a sure playoff team.

Chiefs have Holt, their offense would be scary.

I mean I could go further, but I don't feel like it.

No offense yoda, but they need a QB. Jackson was just as at fault on Thursday as his WR's. Btw, they'll need more than one WR. :P

[sweetness34]

Originally Posted by cardsalltheway

That was never said in the original post so when I voted, I had good reason.

So you're telling me even with those two you wouldn't take Holt? Why the hell not? Give Leinart another stud to throw too and you guys would be pretty much unguardable at WR.

Originally Posted by sweetness34

So you're telling me even with those two you wouldn't take Holt? Why the hell not? Give Leinart another stud to throw too and you guys would be pretty much unguardable at WR.

[sweetness34]

Originally Posted by cardsalltheway

Again, the argument was if you'd take him on your team, money was not an issue in this argument from what I understand.

The question was a simple, "would you take Holt on your team?"

Like I said before, when I voted, I considered money because it didn't mention it not being an issue in the first post. Of course I would take Holt on my team if money wasn't an issue, every single team in the league would.

[sweetness34]

Originally Posted by cardsalltheway

Like I said before, when I voted, I considered money because it didn't mention it not being an issue in the first post. Of course I would take Holt on my team if money wasn't an issue, every single team in the league would.

That's the point of the friggin argument, to make HawkeyeFan look like a complete tool. Money was not an issue when yoda made this thread, it was made to make HF look like a friggin dumbass, which it did.

It's a simple yes/no question. Would you take Torry Holt on your team?

[NGSeiler]

Originally Posted by sweetness34

It's a simple yes/no question. Would you take Torry Holt on your team?

Indeed, there's no reason to overthink it.

[Paul]

Uhh, yes. Next question.

[YAYareaRB]

The 49ers could use him

[NGSeiler]

Y'know, that Isaac Bruce isn't half bad either... 8)

[Boston]

Originally Posted by NGSeiler

Y'know, that Isaac Bruce isn't half bad either... 8)

Who?

[NGSeiler]

Originally Posted by Boston

Who?

Another 1,000 yard season to add to that Hall of Fame résumé. :D

[Boston]

Originally Posted by NGSeiler

Another 1,000 yard season to add to that Hall of Fame résumé. :D

That's Torry Holt. :roll:

Originally Posted by NGSeiler

Another 1,000 yard season to add to that Hall of Fame résumé. :D

Good one.

[NGSeiler]

Originally Posted by cardsalltheway

Good one.

Are you suggesting a receiver who is 7th all time in receptions, 7th all time in receiving yards, 18th all time in receiving touchdowns, and 22nd all time in total yards from scrimmage is not deserving of HOF consideration?

Interesting.

[The Unseen]

Originally Posted by NGSeiler

Another 1,000 yard season to add to that Hall of Fame résumé. :D

Why are there two accented vowels?

[NGSeiler]

Originally Posted by The Unseen

Why are there two accented vowels?

Because that's how I've always spelled résumé?

[Mr. Stiller]

Originally Posted by NGSeiler

Because that's how I've always spelled résumé?

... because Resume is from French Dialect i believe. If not it would be "resume", to start something you paused from.

with the accents its a list of your acheivements and work experience.

[njx9]

Originally Posted by NGSeiler

Are you suggesting a receiver who is 7th all time in receptions, 7th all time in receiving yards, 18th all time in receiving touchdowns, and 22nd all time in total yards from scrimmage is not deserving of HOF consideration?

Interesting.

given that art monk's stats aren't really all that far off, is it really that interesting?