College Football Live - Page 2

keylime_5 · 07-23-2007, 09:21 PM

Not really that excited. Gameday is more than enough. It's not like a care a bit at all about any other teams anyways. Only one college team intrigues me, if they have a show about them I might watch. CFB for me is nothing like the NFL where all the teams are interesting.

b316 · 07-23-2007, 10:24 PM

Im thinking about following college ball more, i consider myself a casual fan, have a few teams i like and know some names. Unlike the NFL where im a devoted fan and NFL live is the best show on ESPN. around the horn and 1st ten when Woody and Skip where on it togethere was good, still is but not as good as before.

Yeah the only team i like is the U, i go to Temple, but they have won 1 game in like 2 years.

keylime_5 · 07-23-2007, 11:01 PM

Skip Bayless is probably the biggest tool in the world. By far the worst person on ESPN. I think PTI is the best thing they've got. Baseball Tonight used to be great when they had Gammons and Harold Reynolds, etc., but it sucks bad now that they don't even say one insightful thing the whole show. Hopefully CFB live can be as good as NFL live, PTI, and Around the Horn.

b316 · 07-24-2007, 12:11 AM

PTI is good hopefully they do make CBF good, what time does it come on

princefielder28 · 07-24-2007, 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhaarat316

PTI is good hopefully they do make CBF good, what time does it come on

330 EST....

Sniper · 07-24-2007, 12:19 AM

Intriguing from what I saw. Corso picked LSU as the top team in the country and Tim Tebow as the most important player. Uh, don't see either one (but I do think LSU is #2/#3).

princefielder28 · 07-24-2007, 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNIPER26

Intriguing from what I saw. Corso picked LSU as the top team in the country and Tim Tebow as the most important player. Uh, don't see either one (but I do think LSU is #2/#3).

Who do you think fits both catergories????

b316 · 07-24-2007, 12:22 AM

I think #1 is WV well atleast on the O side, LSU is pretty good #2, so where would that put the Longhorn, Michigan, and USC all of exceptional Qbs, and teams.

Sniper · 07-24-2007, 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by princefielder28

Who do you think fits both catergories????

I like USC as the #1 team (me and everybody else). For most important player, a lot of players fit the bill. Obviously I'm biased and one of the guys would be Mike Hart. He makes Michigan go, but then again he's got a lot around him.

Ray Rice from Rutgers would definitely be high up there. As most important to his team I think him, Colt Brennan and maybe Brian Brohm could make cases, thouh the backup at UL is good too. What do you think?

Sniper · 07-24-2007, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhaarat316

I think #1 is WV well atleast on the O side, LSU is pretty good #2, so where would that put the Longhorn, Michigan, and USC all of exceptional Qbs, and teams.

On O I still like USC. They're unproven, yes, but there's a ton of talent there. I really hate putting WVU at #1 because their defense is a joke.

My top 5

1. USC
2. LSU
3. Michigan
4. Texas
5. WVU

b316 · 07-24-2007, 12:28 AM

I think most important is Patrick White or Steve Slaton.

Sniper · 07-24-2007, 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhaarat316

I think most important is Patrick White or Steve Slaton.

Why do you say that?

b316 · 07-24-2007, 12:33 AM

Both of those guys are their Offense, i dont think they could do good with out White. Even though their D is a joke. Colt B. now that i think about is more important for Hawaii, without him Hawaii has no chance, but they play no really good teams.

Sniper · 07-24-2007, 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhaarat316

Both of those guys are their Offense, i dont think they could do good with out White. Even though their D is a joke. Colt B. now that i think about is more important for Hawaii, without him Hawaii has no chance, but they play no really good teams.

I think they would do just fine without White. The system tailors to his strengths and covers up the fact that he's a very mediocre passer. They have a lot of depth at QB. They also have a lot of depth at RB. But hey that's your opinion it's cool.

b316 · 07-24-2007, 01:28 AM

nah i dont know jack shitzz about CF, im trying to find out more, not a big fan but im trying to get more into it

kwilk103 · 07-24-2007, 02:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNIPER26

I think they would do just fine without White. The system tailors to his strengths and covers up the fact that he's a very mediocre passer. They have a lot of depth at QB. They also have a lot of depth at RB. But hey that's your opinion it's cool.

wvu fan, and yes rodriguez does tailor the offense to his qb; when white was injured we threw more (rugters game); we have a decent backup qb in jarrett brown, and at rb we have devine; so i would say its neither of them (slaton/white)

neko4 · 07-24-2007, 02:15 AM

I think Texas could run the table, but I'll say USC
And Brennan as most important

constant cough · 07-24-2007, 09:22 AM

Quote:

Skip Bayless is probably the biggest tool in the world. By far the worst person on ESPN. I think PTI is the best thing they've got.

You can say that again.

Sniper · 07-24-2007, 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kwilk103

wvu fan, and yes rodriguez does tailor the offense to his qb; when white was injured we threw more (rugters game); we have a decent backup qb in jarrett brown, and at rb we have devine; so i would say its neither of them (slaton/white)

Adam Bednarik can play too. He was a stud at one of our rival HS.

Sniper · 07-24-2007, 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by neko4

I think Texas could run the table, but I'll say USC
And Brennan as most important

I agree Texas can run the table, but I think USC has the most talent. For all the **** Les Miles said about USC's schedule, I think they ranked it the #2 schedule in the country on Live.

constant cough · 07-24-2007, 10:17 AM

Sorry about the double post, can't figure out how to delete it.

constant cough · 07-24-2007, 10:20 AM

Quote:

I think they ranked it the #2 schedule in the country on Live.

I know that made me laugh. I don't know I'm just not seeing it. Maybe somebody can point out to me what's so tough about it. And please don't tell me Notre Dame and Nebraska.

Idaho
@ Nebraska
Washington State
@Washington
Stanford
Arizona
@ Notre Dame
@ Oregon
Oregon State
@ California
@ Arizona State
UCLA

Sniper · 07-24-2007, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by constant cough

I know that made me laugh.

Why? It's a pretty tough schedule. @ Nebraska, @ ND and @ Oregon in back to back weeks. I know ND isn't going to be great this year but rivalry games are always tough. Oregon State beat USC last year, @ Cal and home vs. UCLA are tough games too.

constant cough · 07-24-2007, 10:27 AM

Quote:

Why? It's a pretty tough schedule. @ Nebraska, @ ND and @ Oregon in back to back weeks.

That's not tough, Nebraska is improved but still no where near USC didn't the trojans drill them last year? Notre Dame is worse than the overrated team they had last year. And Oregon is another run of the mill Pac 10 team.

Hardly what I would consider the 2nd toughest schedule in the country. Are any of those 3 teams even ranked top 15?

ESPN lives to hype the trojans this is nothing new.

Sniper · 07-24-2007, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by constant cough

That's not tough, Nebraska is improved but still no where near USC didn't the trojans drill them last year? Notre Dame is worse than the overrated team they had last year. And Oregon is another run of the mill Pac 10 team.

Hardly what I would consider the 2nd toughest schedule in the country. Are any of those 3 teams even ranked top 15?

Nebraska may be in the 17-20 range I think. Cal will be very good, UCLA is good. Do I think it's the #2 schedule? No. The again, I never see how ND's SOS is ranked so high. But USC plays a good schedule.