Browns Draft Pick Updates - Page 3

pocketaces · 09-09-2007, 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robert_in_bigd

Cleveland to plan.

Philly to plan.

On DC did not cooperate.

So far .... so good.

Tell me again how Philly has the best coaching staff/ G.M. in the league. If Dallas lost to G.B. the way Philly did we'd never hear the end of it.

robert_in_bigd · 09-09-2007, 06:02 PM

Well pocketaces if you saw the game you can not tell me it was the coaching staff's fault.

In fact, if you saw the game you saw a pretty impressive Defensive performance with early season mistakeitis.

Regardless, Andy Reid is a great coach though I hate everything Eagles.

You still are are a fairly low-end poster when it comes to insights.

pocketaces · 09-09-2007, 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robert_in_bigd

Well pocketaces if you saw the game you can not tell me it was the coaching staff's fault.

In fact, if you saw the game you saw a pretty impressive Defensive performance with early season mistakeitis.

Regardless, Andy Reid is a great coach though I hate everything Eagles.

You still are are a fairly low-end poster when it comes to insights.

What I saw was the better team losing a game they had no buisness losing. And the only reason I'm a low end poster is because I constently prove your thoughts/theroies wrong. Of course everybody else has been doing a GREAT job of doing that lately. The Eagles played a bad game with alot more talent which from everything you've written is unacceptable.
Once again you look foolish....but were used to it.

robert_in_bigd · 09-09-2007, 09:00 PM

Roy Williams!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anything else will do.

D-Unit · 09-16-2007, 11:13 PM

Bring Back Charlie Frye!!!!!!

BrownsTown · 09-16-2007, 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D-Unit

Bring Back Charlie Frye!!!!!!

Muahahahahahaha

Ware_HITStick · 09-21-2007, 08:51 AM

robert, i tend to find that you lack insight as well

LonghornsLegend · 09-23-2007, 06:12 PM

O well so much for the browns upset victory last week, pretty much everybody said oakland was probably where one of their W's would come from and they blew it this week so it makes up for last week and their right back on track for 3 wins :)

leroyisgod · 09-23-2007, 06:24 PM

The Browns had the game of their season last week. They'll end up with 3-4 wins this season which should give up a top 3 pick.

BrownsTown · 09-23-2007, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leroyisgod

The Browns had the game of their season last week. They'll end up with 3-4 wins this season which should give up a top 3 pick.

They should be 2-1...The Browns will probably go 5-11 or 6-10 and get in the early-mid first round, but you can always hope I guess.

LSUALUM99 · 09-23-2007, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrownsTown

They should be 2-1...The Browns will probably go 5-11 or 6-10 and get in the early-mid first round, but you can always hope I guess.

They should be 0-3. If they played the Bengals 100 times in a row, they'd lose 75 of them. The Bengals are a better team.

BrownsTown · 09-23-2007, 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LSUALUM99

They should be 0-3. If they played the Bengals 100 times in a row, they'd lose 75 of them. The Bengals are a better team.

The Bengals are 1-2, with losses to a 1-2 team and a 2-1 team that sucks balls.

The Browns are 1-2 with losses to a 1-2 team and a 3-0 team.

The Browns beat the Bengals head to head.

Say what now?

pocketaces · 09-23-2007, 08:19 PM

The Browns lost (choked) to the worst team in the league. But be happy you did play them close.

BrownsTown · 09-23-2007, 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketaces

The Browns lost (choked) to the worst team in the league. But be happy you did play them close.

Raiders aren't the worst...Falcons, Chiefs, and Vikings are worse.

pocketaces · 09-23-2007, 09:21 PM

If that makes you feel better but last I remember the Raiders had the 1st pick in the draft. Guess it will be ours this year. :)

JJJ888 · 09-23-2007, 11:10 PM

This is good: you guys are talking trash about draft picks.

LSUALUM99 · 09-23-2007, 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrownsTown

The Bengals are 1-2, with losses to a 1-2 team and a 2-1 team that sucks balls.

The Browns are 1-2 with losses to a 1-2 team and a 3-0 team.

The Browns beat the Bengals head to head.

Say what now?

I say that the Bengals would beat the Browns more times than the Browns would beat them if they played head to head 100 times in a row.

I say the Bengals had more wins last year and will have more wins this year. The Bengals have a better QB, better RB, better WR's. The Browns defense might be better but who knows, neither team can stop anyone.

Mr. Stiller · 09-23-2007, 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LSUALUM99

I say that the Bengals would beat the Browns more times than the Browns would beat them if they played head to head 100 times in a row.

I say the Bengals had more wins last year and will have more wins this year. The Bengals have a better QB, better RB, better WR's. The Browns defense might be better but who knows, neither team can stop anyone.

Playing 100 times doesn't matter.

They lost.

LSUALUM99 · 09-23-2007, 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Stiller

Playing 100 times doesn't matter.

They lost.

That's an ignorant statement. We're not discussing who won the game. It's clear that the Browns won the game. We're discussing who is the better team. Since we all know that on any given sunday any team can win it's not indicative of who is the better team overall. It's indicative of who is the better team that day.

If the Browns go 5-10 through the first 15 weeks but beat the Patriots on the last game of the season after the Patriots had gone 14-1 through 15 weeks would you really say the Browns were the better team overall?

BrownsTown · 09-23-2007, 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LSUALUM99

That's an ignorant statement. We're not discussing who won the game. It's clear that the Browns won the game. We're discussing who is the better team. Since we all know that on any given sunday any team can win it's not indicative of who is the better team overall. It's indicative of who is the better team that day.

If the Browns go 5-10 through the first 15 weeks but beat the Patriots on the last game of the season after the Patriots had gone 14-1 through 15 weeks would you really say the Browns were the better team overall?

That's different. We're talking teams with the same record, not a team crazy far behind another.

LonghornsLegend · 09-24-2007, 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrownsTown

That's different. We're talking teams with the same record, not a team crazy far behind another.

Im not even sure what your trying to argue or make people prove, most say 3-4 wins, are you arguing for 5-6 wow huge different, its still a top 10 pick and most the premiere positions will be there because at least one qb will be taken maybe 2 inside the top 5

my point is that its irrelevant that you guys beat Cincy, a team no one thought you would, because when we posted the schedules we said you would probably beat Oakland, but you didnt...thus your still 1-2 at this point in the season, which we all figured you would be...i dont care how bad or really bad you argue you guys are i really dont, because its going to be a top 10 pick either way it goes

robert_in_bigd · 09-24-2007, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketaces

Tell me again how Philly has the best coaching staff/ G.M. in the league. If Dallas lost to G.B. the way Philly did we'd never hear the end of it.

Well GB is 3-0. Philly just put up 1,000 points.

So...........

robert_in_bigd · 09-24-2007, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LonghornsLegend

Im not even sure what your trying to argue or make people prove, most say 3-4 wins, are you arguing for 5-6 wow huge different, its still a top 10 pick and most the premiere positions will be there because at least one qb will be taken maybe 2 inside the top 5

my point is that its irrelevant that you guys beat Cincy, a team no one thought you would, because when we posted the schedules we said you would probably beat Oakland, but you didnt...thus your still 1-2 at this point in the season, which we all figured you would be...i dont care how bad or really bad you argue you guys are i really dont, because its going to be a top 10 pick either way it goes

Baltimore and New England back to back for Cleveland.

So 1-4 coming right up.

Then it is a race with the Falcons and Kansas City to the bottom.

Any luck Anderson goes down next week and Spacey Quinn plays?

D-Unit · 09-24-2007, 01:49 PM

This is going to be fun. I'm going to track their record in comparison with the rest of the league to see how many teams are equal or worse than them in the standings.

Week 1: 16 Teams with 0-1 records.
Week 2: 22 Teams with 1-1 or worse records.
Week 3: 17 Teams with 1-2 or worse records.

BrownsTown · 09-24-2007, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LonghornsLegend

Im not even sure what your trying to argue or make people prove, most say 3-4 wins, are you arguing for 5-6 wow huge different, its still a top 10 pick and most the premiere positions will be there because at least one qb will be taken maybe 2 inside the top 5

my point is that its irrelevant that you guys beat Cincy, a team no one thought you would, because when we posted the schedules we said you would probably beat Oakland, but you didnt...thus your still 1-2 at this point in the season, which we all figured you would be...i dont care how bad or really bad you argue you guys are i really dont, because its going to be a top 10 pick either way it goes

That's not what I was talking to him about, he was arguing Cinci should have beaten Cleveland.