|
|
| Pro Football Discuss professional football. |
|
View Poll Results: Interior or Exterior Pass Rush?
|
|
Interior Pass Rush
|
 
|
83 |
68.03% |
|
Exterior Pass Rush
|
 
|
39 |
31.97% |
03-23-2008, 07:01 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,555
Reputation: 314409
|
Well it changes for 3-4 and 4-3 defenses, but it seems like people are talking about the 4-3 more in here. I'd take Warren Sapp over a Michael Strahan any day. Interior pass rushers not only get to the QB but they cause a lot of chaos for the o line. Exterior rushers may draw double teams but at most its from a G and T which means that the rest of the line is basically unaffected. Interior rushers affect the entire o line more than the outside guys. Plus interior rushers are always in the QBs face making them nervous and causing quicker, less accurate releases.
interior rushers it is!
__________________
Penn State University - Detroit Red Wings - New York Jets - New York Red Bulls - Fulham FC
|
|
|
|   Sponsored Advertisement |
|   Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
03-23-2008, 07:09 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Near the Bay
Posts: 5,946
Reputation: 2559
|
I'll take an interior rush myself.It seems easy to find a 3rd down pass rusher like Chris Clemons.
__________________
"The liberator who destroys my property, is fighting to save my spirit. The teacher who clears all possessions from my path will set me free."-Tyler Durden
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 07:17 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 8,025
Reputation: 225219
|
You need both features and implement it in a good system for it to actually matter. That's like saying what do you want more a QB with a stronger arm, or QB with great accuracy? Both kinds can win, just has to be in a system that fits them. Same with the rush... Remember there are 5 o-line vs 4 Dline, assuming 4-3, so you can always double team someone on the inside, and have a rollout or sprint pass protection called. So basically you need both kinds of pass rush ability, and have a good system for it.
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 07:33 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Coolio Cat
Legend
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Stalking Brian Leonard and Raymell Rice
Posts: 22,393
Reputation: 3236100
|
Although you need both, I'm gonna say interior.
Giants had an outstanding rush with Osi and Strahan, BUT, when Tuck came around with the rush in the middle it made our D dominant.
__________________

BoneKrusher with the ridiculously sexy sig
I bleed scarlet for Rutgers
New York Giants Super Bowl 46 Champs
UNITED: I actually attend the college I root for
<+Wooty> I have a feeling kenny britt will be awesomeness (woot with rare epic win)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PalmerToCJ
BTW, if it's 3rd and 97... I'm throwing a screen pass to Brian Leonard and he will convert.
|
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 08:08 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12,143
Reputation: 46580
|
An exterior pass rush. In one sentence, the interior pass rushers just have to push the pocket, but the exterior rushers actually have to beat their man.
__________________
sig by BoneKrusher
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 08:12 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 860
Reputation: 22363
|
Interior all day, for reasons that folks have already stated.
__________________

RIP ST
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 08:13 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,298
Reputation: 198285
|
Seems im a fan of the 3-4 im gonna say outside. 3-4 teams hardly ever get pressure from there front three, and they arent supposed to. Some of the most successfull D's in the league, bring almost exclusively outside pressure...Steelers, Pats, Ravens, Chargers etc...
To be honest i wouldnt know for a 4-3, but i would probably say outside...the giants DT's werent the main reason for all of there sacks last year, it was there talented DE's.
__________________
Last edited by Jakey : 03-23-2008 at 08:15 PM.
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 08:30 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,544
Reputation: 330949
|
It kind of depends on what kind of quarterback you're facing. If you're playing a quarterback that is more comfortable outside the pocket, it would better serve you to have good pass rushers keeping outside contain. If you have a quarterback that's more comfortable stepping up in the pocket, then a good interior rush would be better. But still even if you do have a great interior rush, if you don't have a guy coming off the edge forcing the qb to step up, it's kind of a moot point.
__________________
sig by BoneKrusher
PACKERS BADGERS BREWERS BUCKS
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 09:02 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Legend
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 24,956
Reputation: 2084404
|
ideally you want the interior guy. but its very very difficult finding that caliber player on the inside.
we are able to somewhat sidestep this problem by putting out 4 DEs on the dline in our nickel, and using various stunt combinations to generate both an interior and exterior push. and Tuck is beastly enough to play UT even in our base 4-3.
i expect to see this become a new trend, where teams will invest in 3 quality pass rushers up front in some shape or form after seeing what the Giants were able to do. its a copy cat league, so it wouldn't shock me to see that become a new trend. i think its a good idea anyway, every defense needs 3 quality pass rushers.
EDIT: For clarification, 3-4 teams do want interior push. In a 3-4, your interior push either comes from the NT or a 3-4 DE. Thats why guys like Castillo are gold, because they provide the "interior push" that every 3-4 defense desires.
Guys like Leonard Marshall, Richard Seymour in his prime, they are priceless for any 3-4. They provide an interior push or even an exterior one opposite the rushbacker when sending 4. And you can move them around, and move them to the same side as the rushbacker, and have the rushbacker provide the outside edge rush, with the DE providing the interior push on the same side.
__________________
Thanks D-Unit
Knicks. (10 char)
#KnicksIn2013
Carmelo Anthony is a better and more productive player than Kevin Durant
Last edited by bigbluedefense : 03-23-2008 at 09:24 PM.
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 09:35 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Alabama
Posts: 9,568
Reputation: 78865
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbluedefense
ideally you want the interior guy. but its very very difficult finding that caliber player on the inside.
we are able to somewhat sidestep this problem by putting out 4 DEs on the dline in our nickel, and using various stunt combinations to generate both an interior and exterior push. and Tuck is beastly enough to play UT even in our base 4-3.
i expect to see this become a new trend, where teams will invest in 3 quality pass rushers up front in some shape or form after seeing what the Giants were able to do. its a copy cat league, so it wouldn't shock me to see that become a new trend. i think its a good idea anyway, every defense needs 3 quality pass rushers.
EDIT: For clarification, 3-4 teams do want interior push. In a 3-4, your interior push either comes from the NT or a 3-4 DE. Thats why guys like Castillo are gold, because they provide the "interior push" that every 3-4 defense desires.
Guys like Leonard Marshall, Richard Seymour in his prime, they are priceless for any 3-4. They provide an interior push or even an exterior one opposite the rushbacker when sending 4. And you can move them around, and move them to the same side as the rushbacker, and have the rushbacker provide the outside edge rush, with the DE providing the interior push on the same side.
|
Good post. You want a Warren Sapp, but I can count on one hand how many interior pass rushers have been as good as him. But I will take an elite pass rushing defensive end over a very good pass rushing defensive tackle anyday, I prefer the defensive tackle but the difference is not very substantial.
__________________
Virginia Tech.
ACC Champions 2004, 2007, 2008, 2010
Next Up: 2012
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 09:37 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Moderator
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: KO-V>O-V
Posts: 14,845
Reputation: 1045330
|
The thing is, an interior rush is far less consistent than an exterior rush. On the inside, a player can get double teamed much easier(and by better players. C+G>T+TE/RB). An outside rusher will generally turn the corner on his man. Also, seeing as the DTs are generally bigger than DEs, and are forced to outmuscle their way through two offensive linemen, they're more likely to tire by the end of the game. People will bring up Justin Tuck, but as dominant as he is, he's still that line's 3rd most dangerous pass rusher. Teams can't double him, or Osi and Strahan will wreak havoc. Realistically, you need both to a degree. If not, here is what happens.
Terrible DE, amazing DT: QB free to drop back as far as he wants, roll out when or wherever, and even step around the pressure.
Terrible DT, amazing DE: QB can step up to avoid the rush, which renders it completely obsolete unless he actually disengages his tackle to the inside(very difficult).
Good DE, Good pass rushing DT: If the QB steps up, he runs into the DT. If he doesn't step up, he runs the risk of the DE turning the corner and planting him.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Wright
Terrellezzzzzzzz Pryorzzzzzzzz!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by njx9
do i tell you when to flip the burger?
|
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 09:42 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
bhaarat316
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 12,957
Reputation: 647539
|
I like the bull rush DE like Patrick Allen or A. Smith from the Steelers, even though they are diffrent DEs. But DE with the ability to Bull rush.
__________________
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 10:00 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,047
Reputation: 81488
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerBaron
ill agree with ya there but try telling me that having 2 tommie harris's inside wont hurt your run d. even ill admit to that.....
you get up against a tough oline, have to pull your safeties into the box to stop the run, and suddenly even your pass d is weakeend
|
Yea, but having two John Henderson's, Kevin Williams', Casey Hampton's, Jamal's Williams', Vince Wilforks', Albert Haynesworths', or similar players would make your D sick all around. It's worked fine for the Jaguars and Vikings in the 4-3, and 3-4 teams pretty much live and die on their DL playing like elite 4-3 DT's.
Last edited by SenorGato : 03-23-2008 at 10:05 PM.
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 10:21 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Alabama
Posts: 9,568
Reputation: 78865
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorGato
Yea, but having two John Henderson's, Kevin Williams', Casey Hampton's, Jamal's Williams', Vince Wilforks', Albert Haynesworths', or similar players would make your D sick all around. It's worked fine for the Jaguars and Vikings in the 4-3, and 3-4 teams pretty much live and die on their DL playing like elite 4-3 DT's.
|
The Vikings probably have the best defensive tackle in the duo now that Marcus Stroud was traded from Jacksonville to Buffalo, and their defense gets passed on constantly and they still are searching for a pass rushing defensive end.
__________________
Virginia Tech.
ACC Champions 2004, 2007, 2008, 2010
Next Up: 2012
|
|
|
03-24-2008, 07:51 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
The Juggernaut
Legend
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 22,067
Reputation: 369108
|
I like the exterior pass rush better. You don't necceasrily need guys in the middle to collapse the pocket. You just need guy to stand ground and the point of attack. As long as your DTs aren't pushed back off the ball it will be difficult for a QB to step up to avoid a pass rush from the DE positions. A lot of DTs gets cheaps sacks becaus of pressure on the outside. Also when you get that pass rush up the middle, a lot of times you are doing it at the cost of a weakened run defense. The exterior rush is also more likely to cause a turnover.
__________________
|
|
|
03-24-2008, 04:24 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: toronto
Posts: 7,053
Reputation: 114301
|
Having an interior rush allows your defense to do so many things then a exterior rush. You allow your MIKE to make plays behind the line, and allow your DB to make plays.
__________________
|
|
|
03-24-2008, 05:58 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Legend
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 24,956
Reputation: 2084404
|
they both need to work together. you look at great pressure teams, they usually have a guy who can bring it on the outside along with interior pressure.
the thing is, its sooo hard finding a guy on teh inside that can consistently bring it. you can probably count them on your finger. Page, Sapp, Randle, is there anyone else?
The Giants dline didn't become dominant until we had Tuck bring inside pressure this year. And as was pointed out however, he doesn't do what he does if there wasn't 2 guys on the edge that both demand double teams. So they have to work together.
I think a better question is: Speed rushers or bullrushers?
I like bullrushers, I think that ultimately a bullrushing DE can provide you the medium that you ideally want. A guy like Strahan, or Kampman, they can provide exterior pressure but also interior pressure by the standard bullrush into the qb.
Speed rushers are often more easily neutralized.
__________________
Thanks D-Unit
Knicks. (10 char)
#KnicksIn2013
Carmelo Anthony is a better and more productive player than Kevin Durant
|
|
|
03-24-2008, 06:40 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: There's no place I can be since I found Serenity.
Posts: 19,244
Reputation: 1547812
|
It all starts in the middle on D IMO.
__________________
|
|
|
03-24-2008, 06:42 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Alabama
Posts: 9,568
Reputation: 78865
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbluedefense
they both need to work together. you look at great pressure teams, they usually have a guy who can bring it on the outside along with interior pressure.
the thing is, its sooo hard finding a guy on teh inside that can consistently bring it. you can probably count them on your finger. Page, Sapp, Randle, is there anyone else?
The Giants dline didn't become dominant until we had Tuck bring inside pressure this year. And as was pointed out however, he doesn't do what he does if there wasn't 2 guys on the edge that both demand double teams. So they have to work together.
I think a better question is: Speed rushers or bullrushers?
I like bullrushers, I think that ultimately a bullrushing DE can provide you the medium that you ideally want. A guy like Strahan, or Kampman, they can provide exterior pressure but also interior pressure by the standard bullrush into the qb.
Speed rushers are often more easily neutralized.
|
I think Bryant Young deserves to be on that list of great interior pass rushers. Maybe not where the other three were or are, but very good none the less.
__________________
Virginia Tech.
ACC Champions 2004, 2007, 2008, 2010
Next Up: 2012
|
|
|
03-24-2008, 06:45 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Legend
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 24,956
Reputation: 2084404
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BamaFalcon59
I think Bryant Young deserves to be on that list of great interior pass rushers. Maybe not where the other three were or are, but very good none the less.
|
Tommie Harris might deserve a shout out too if he keeps it up throughout his career.
__________________
Thanks D-Unit
Knicks. (10 char)
#KnicksIn2013
Carmelo Anthony is a better and more productive player than Kevin Durant
|
|
|
03-24-2008, 10:25 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,652
Reputation: 83184
|
The ideal situation is to have a pair of interior guys who are quick enough to force O-lines to respect their pass-rushing ability and big enough for double-teams to be nessecary. Take the Jaguars defensive tackle duo before Stroud was traded.
To take advantage of this situation, you NEED a good edge rusher. Having the advantage of putting edge rushers against tackles one-on-one without any TE or RB help puts you over the top.
Unfortunately, we've not had that guy for 8 years.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by bored of education
MJD is an exception to every rule.
|
|
|
|
03-27-2008, 06:59 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Emmaus, PA
Posts: 12,357
Reputation: 1194716
|
This is one of the reasons I like what the Eagles are doing with the D-line. We have a rusher in Patterson, who is underrated against the run IMO, and a clogger in Bunkley. He will never have the stats of Patterson, but will have just as much of an impact on the D-line. We also have a pass rushing DE in Trent Cole, also underrated against the run IMO, and a new starter in Abiamiri wh is solid at the POA. The D-line is a very balanced one and is set to be great for the Eagles if you ask me.
__________________
Nanna Bryndís Hilmarsdóttir is a goddess
Rest in Peace, themaninblack
|
|
|
03-27-2008, 01:12 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,512
Reputation: 297
|
You need DTs that collapse the line to make it easier for your DEs.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mythbusta
i love my pedestal. thats why im the mythbusta.
|
who dey?
|
|
|
03-29-2008, 02:21 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Bat Country
Posts: 2,696
Reputation: 12513
|
Interior, QBs can step with guys coming off the egde but guys up the middle there is no way if they go back they are gonna lose tons of yards, if they try to go left of right they get ran straight into the DEs.
__________________
|
|
|
03-29-2008, 11:23 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Hall of Famer
Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Not Oakland, CA
Posts: 19,729
Reputation: 1306926
|
I'll take a double dose of Reggie White please! (brings it inside and out)
__________________

Oldie but a goodie.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 AM.
|