Bowe likes Cassel and wants Crabtree.

Splat · 03-04-2009, 05:08 PM

http://fantasynews.cbssports.c...ry/11457837/rss

Really good read.

bored of education · 03-04-2009, 05:13 PM

seriusly how awesome is DBowe

Splat · 03-04-2009, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bored of education

seriusly how awesome is DBowe

All most as awesome as you but you have more rep.:)

bored of education · 03-04-2009, 05:17 PM

iam pretty awesome but i cant tipe or spel

CT Bronco Fan · 03-04-2009, 05:18 PM

Bowe and Crabtree, yikes, no thanks.

bored of education · 03-04-2009, 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CT Bronco Fan

Bowe and Crabtree, yikes, no thanks.

you are obviously saying that as a Broncos fan :D

Splat · 03-04-2009, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CT Bronco Fan

Bowe and Crabtree, yikes, no thanks.

And Gonzo FTW!!!

CT Bronco Fan · 03-04-2009, 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bored of education

you are obviously saying that as a Broncos fan :D

I was being totally un-biased!

vidae · 03-04-2009, 07:45 PM

Bowe, Crabtree, Franklin, Bradley, Charles and Tony G! Explosive!

BPhilb · 03-04-2009, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vidae-KC

Bowe, Crabtree, Franklin, Bradley, Charles and Tony G! Explosive!

I thought the same thing a few years back when the Raiders had Jordan, Moss, Porter, and Collins but without a good OLine they didn't produce squat. I think we are further along than they were on the line but I still think we need to upgrade there before this offense takes the next step.

T-RICH49 · 03-04-2009, 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bored of education

iam pretty awesome but i cant tipe or spel

norr kan I

T-RICH49 · 03-04-2009, 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vidae-KC

Bowe, Crabtree, Franklin, Bradley, Charles and Tony G! Explosive!

Matt Cassel would be one happy QB

bored of education · 03-05-2009, 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BPhilb

I thought the same thing a few years back when the Raiders had Jordan, Moss, Porter, and Collins but without a good OLine they didn't produce squat. I think we are further along than they were on the line but I still think we need to upgrade there before this offense takes the next step.

Which is why, knowing Pioli (which no one knows) it is not out of the question that and OT is drafted. I highly doubt it since Albert was one of the best rookie OT's and that was while a position change occurred.

nepg · 03-05-2009, 11:18 AM

The OL will be exponentially better next year simply from a massive upgrade at the position coach and the scheme change. Add in a couple in-roster tweaks (Richardson to RT), and they're not that far from having a solid OL...good enough in the pass protection department anyway...

Crabs is an option, but I've always had Maclin higher, and definitely still do with Crabs' inability to workout prior to the draft...
________
AmericanStyle_ live

BPhilb · 03-05-2009, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nepg

The OL will be exponentially better next year simply from a massive upgrade at the position coach and the scheme change. Add in a couple in-roster tweaks (Richardson to RT), and they're not that far from having a solid OL...good enough in the pass protection department anyway...

Crabs is an option, but I've always had Maclin higher, and definitely still do with Crabs' inability to workout prior to the draft...

I'm a believer in building the trenchs which is why I've been on the OT bandwagon for so long. I do agree with what you are saying with Maclin though, if we went down the reciever road Maclin become essientlialy what Welker is to New England which would be a seious weapon for us not to mention his return ability. That said though it's a luxery pick on a team where we really can't afford luxeries.

vidae · 03-05-2009, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BPhilb

I'm a believer in building the trenchs which is why I've been on the OT bandwagon for so long. I do agree with what you are saying with Maclin though, if we went down the reciever road Maclin become essientlialy what Welker is to New England which would be a seious weapon for us not to mention his return ability. That said though it's a luxery pick on a team where we really can't afford luxeries.

I agree, but I'd be all for trading back, grabbing an extra pick or two (maybe close to the second we traded) and picking Maclin later. I'd love that. Then you could look at best available LB / OL in the second round where there is bound to be some talent.

nepg · 03-05-2009, 04:22 PM

Well, if Curry's not there, they're stuck either making a poor value pick, or taking a guy like Maclin who can help them right away. I agree that, if Curry's not there, they need to trade back... But going by need, the best pick would be Tyson Jackson...
________
White Widow Seeds

Hermstheman83 · 03-06-2009, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nepg

Well, if Curry's not there, they're stuck either making a poor value pick, or taking a guy like Maclin who can help them right away. I agree that, if Curry's not there, they need to trade back... But going by need, the best pick would be Tyson Jackson...

Tyson Jackson wouldn't be a bad pick. He's definately the prototypical 3-4 End. But I seriously doubt we'll have any takers' for 3 overall.