|
|
| Pro Football Discuss professional football. |
03-08-2007, 01:54 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 786
Reputation: 23
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy
I feel that Tank Tyler or Okoye would be a good fit. But, they could move up and get Alan Branch if they wanted to.
|
Okoye especially, I agree.
Then again, I'm sort of an Okoye nut. He'd fit well on pretty much any team.
__________________
|
|
|
|   Sponsored Advertisement |
|   Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
03-08-2007, 02:10 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,643
Reputation: 208
|
Why Dont The Raiders Sign A Te????
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 02:43 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Morgantown, WV
Posts: 2,798
Reputation: 37005
|
I have mixed feelings about this signing. On one hand, the Rams are adding a talented player at a position that Scott Linehan has a history of using quite a bit in previous jobs as an offensive coordinator. McMichael should start over Klopfenstein but I anticipate a continued use of two tight end sets. On the other hand, the timing of this is strange. Dominique Byrd just recently had another run in with the law, and it's not as if the Rams are making a statement about not tolerating off the field issues by signing McMichael since he doesn't exactly have a squeaky clean record himself. It's a three year deal though, so it's not like the Rams are married to Randy long-term if he can't behave himself.
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 03:31 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Icon
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Clear eyes. Full hearts. Can't lose.
Posts: 19,777
Reputation: 850824
|
I don't understand this signing. It would be a terrific signing if they had not already invested two first day picks in TE's, as Charm and bf_51 have already pointed out. Now, I don't know what they are going to do with three TE's.
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 03:31 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 6,730
Reputation: 56147
|
Its an interesting signing, but its a wasted one. Sure he'll be used and he'll contribute, but you can't tell me he's worth more than one of the FA DEs or DBs out there.
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 03:35 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Legend
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23,423
Reputation: 102758
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlindSite
Its an interesting signing, but its a wasted one. Sure he'll be used and he'll contribute, but you can't tell me he's worth more than one of the FA DEs or DBs out there.
|
No, he's not worth more than one of the FA DE's out there, but that's why they decided to spend a pick and deal for James Hall instead, as they felt that his contract was worth it, because they felt that Hall on the open market would gain more. And while I think they could use another DB, it isn't a big need for them to warrant FA spending. And at the end of the day, guys are paid based upon how teams judge their values, and the Rams didn't have the needs at DE and DB to make it necessary to spend the big bucks on marginal free agent talent. I don't know how their cap breaks down, but I'm assuming they have things in order, and if that's the case, and they can afford this, then it's a fine move if they are willing to pay it. This gives them a lot of draft flexibility, with DT arguably as their only big need, allowing them to be aggressive in pushing up for one if they fear one won't get to their spot.
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 03:57 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Lynn Swan of SWDC Hall of Fame
Posts: 18,133
Reputation: 172402
|
The Rams will be able to score on anybody. Now to address that pathetic defense in the draft...
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 04:08 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Morgantown, WV
Posts: 2,798
Reputation: 37005
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by diabsoule
I don't understand this signing. It would be a terrific signing if they had not already invested two first day picks in TE's, as Charm and bf_51 have already pointed out. Now, I don't know what they are going to do with three TE's.
|
Second round pick Joe Klopfenstein isn't going anywhere. The Rams tried to use more two tight ends sets in 2006 and should continue in 2007 with McMichael and Klopfenstein. Dominique Byrd (93rd overall in 2006) and Aaron Walker will compete for the third tight end spot, assuming Byrd's future isn't already sealed with his recent DUI arrest.
Plus, the contract the Rams signed McMichael to is hardly a big one. Three years, $11 million total with a $3 million signing bonus. It's structured well, so the Rams aren't married to Randy for the long-term.
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 04:11 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Legend
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23,423
Reputation: 102758
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NGSeiler
Second round pick Joe Klopfenstein isn't going anywhere. The Rams tried to use more two tight ends sets in 2006 and should continue in 2007 with McMichael and Klopfenstein. Dominique Byrd (93rd overall in 2006) and Aaron Walker will compete for the third tight end spot, assuming Byrd's future isn't already sealed with his recent DUI arrest.
Plus, the contract the Rams signed McMichael to is hardly a big one. Three years, $11 million total with a $3 million signing bonus. It's structured well, so the Rams aren't married to Randy for the long-term.
|
If it's structured well (mainly, bulk of money in later years), then I'd say this is nothing short of a brilliant move by the Rams. Shores up an offensive area (after all, neither Byrd nor Klopfenstein would likely put up McMichael type production next year), doesn't overcommitt money, allows them to cut the cord with McMichael if Klopfenstein really develops, but even if they keep McMichael, the money likely wouldn't be too much. It'd be a superb move ... and considering how it frees up their draft, they really would have had one of the better offseasons (Hall, Bennett, McMichael - filling key needs and freeing up draft options).
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 04:18 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sioux Falls
Posts: 16,487
Reputation: 296089
|
Where's Hawkeyefan now? He was always complaining how the Rams weren't doing anything.
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 04:20 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 25,359
Reputation: 1165705
|
I'm very suprised by this, so much for the two picks from last year
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 04:20 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In the sea of waking dreams...
Posts: 7,238
Reputation: 48966
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiver
The Rams will be able to score on anybody. Now to address that pathetic defense in the draft...
|
Sounds very similar to the Saints... hm.
__________________
The whole world loves neophyte athletic tight end Jimmy Graham from Miami with the 95th pick. "Best pick in the draft,'' one AFC coach told me. "Give him time, and in that offense, he'll be better than [Jeremy] Shockey by the start of next year.''
“We know that no matter the adversity, be it the lockout, be it the suspension or be it a hurricane, our men will pull together and defend the honor of this city. We’ve shown we’ve been able to do that.” - Jabari Greer
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 04:28 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 316
Reputation: 43
|
Greatest Show On Turf 2? ;)
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 04:29 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12,143
Reputation: 46580
|
Linehan sure loves his Tight Ends. Are they gonna cut Byrd now or what? Maybe they should try addressing the defense......
__________________
sig by BoneKrusher
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 04:30 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12,143
Reputation: 46580
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vikes99ej
Where's Hawkeyefan now? He was always complaining how the Rams weren't doing anything.
|
He will complain more now that they wasted money on a TE that can't catch when they need to fix the D.
__________________
sig by BoneKrusher
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 04:52 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
DC Creeper
Icon
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 16,633
Reputation: 1045143
|
I like it. Bruce will belimited to about 50-60 receptions 2 tds. Bennett might be good red zone threat that may open up naturally or open up more for TE or Holt. Bennett Bruce get about 60 receptions apiece, 7-8 TDs total, Randy gets about 40 receptions, 4 tds. Holt 100 receptions, 12 tds.
I think its big moves for them, pick up a DT or ILB first round Willis, Okoye, Branch.
Love it for them.
The Amaradillo will take the reigns as 3rd best RB in the NFL. 2000 total yards 15 tds.
Bulger must under rated QB, top 5 in the NFL.
__________________
my scent?...like making love to a lumberjack
<TACKLE> i will ngata give you a bj raji
<+BOE> Scott, with Burfict's character concerns (whether legit or not) you think Pioli would draft him. :D
<+ScottWright> Why not. Baldwin does need a sparring partner...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hermstheman83
What's with the hate on Ricky Stanzi? Those youtube clips of him with the hulk hogan theme music instantly make him better than Luck.
|
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 04:54 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12,143
Reputation: 46580
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bored of education
I like it. Bruce will belimited to about 50-60 receptions 2 tds. Bennett might be good red zone threat that may open up naturally or open up more for TE or Holt. Bennett Bruce get about 60 receptions apiece, 7-8 TDs total, Randy gets about 40 receptions, 4 tds. Holt 100 receptions, 12 tds.
I think its big moves for them, pick up a DT or ILB first round Willis, Okoye, Branch.
Love it for them.
The Amaradillo will take the reigns as 3rd best RB in the NFL. 2000 total yards 15 tds.
Bulger must under rated QB, top 5 in the NFL.
|
Those are pretty optimistic numbers assuming you aren't being sarcastic. I don't think a team could possibly have enough plays to rack up those stats, especially with a miserable defense.
__________________
sig by BoneKrusher
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 05:56 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 560
Reputation: -9
|
That Rams offense will be very scary with having Bruce, Holt, Bennett, McMike and Jackson.
For Rams fans, get used to his bad blocking and dropping alot of catchable balls. You will love him sometimes and you can just hate the guy sometimes too.
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 06:03 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Norway
Posts: 3,216
Reputation: 31235
|
Good signing. Was hoping we would sign him, but Johnson is good too :)
__________________

Signature made by me
2009-2010 Pick the Winners: 190-77
2010-2011 Pick the Winners: 162-105
2011-2012 Pick the Winners: 168-99
2012-2013 Pick the Winners: 171-95-1
Sveen's 2013 NFL Draft Spreadsheet
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 07:17 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 105
Reputation: 11365
|
I love the signing. Of course I wish we'd work on defense but we signed him at alot cheaper than expected and he's a potential Pro Bowl Tight End especially in the NFC.
As long as the Rams sign Deon Grant I'll be happy :)
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 07:35 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Legend
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23,423
Reputation: 102758
|
You expect them to make a move for a starting safety? I don't see it. I think Adam Schefter said the Seahawks were close to signing Grant, btw. Atogwe looked promising enough to warrant another year as a starter, and Chavous likely isn't getting replaced. Johnson adds depth, where there were already some options. The problem with addressing defense was that the talent crop this year was quite thin. There really wasn't much on the DL. I think the addition of Hall was a good move, considering how much he potentially could've gotten as a FA had he been cut. DT talent was just iffy on the market, but they could still end up pursuing guys like Alfonso Boone or Ian Scott, to name a couple, now that the market has settled down (not that I've heard anything). Dunno, it seems they went it thinking "Offense in FA, Defense in the draft" ... and they are well positioned to address their defensive needs, and can be more aggressive now.
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 07:40 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 105
Reputation: 11365
|
Atogwe is a FS, and Chavous is going to need to be replaced soon. Carter as much as I love him won't ever be a starting NFL Strong Safety. Thats why I wish the Rams would go after Deon Grant or Ken Hamlin, either of them can play Strong Safety, as can Mike Doss.
And I'm well aware that Randy McMichael has a few drops here and there, he's a playmaker though and thats what we need.
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 08:21 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California
Posts: 4,128
Reputation: 309624
|
I don't understand why they would get McMichael and plan on using 2 TE's when they just picked up Bennet who would only be on the field in 3 WR sets. Either Klopfensteinwhatever is gonna be on the bench most of the time or the Rams are re-tarded.
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 08:26 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12,143
Reputation: 46580
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stash
I don't understand why they would get McMichael and plan on using 2 TE's when they just picked up Bennet who would only be on the field in 3 WR sets. Either Klopfensteinwhatever is gonna be on the bench most of the time or the Rams are re-tarded.
|
Maybe because Bruce will be the 3 WR set guy, and it's the Rams, all they ever care about is offense. Same old horrible GM all these years, unless I am mistaken and he has been replaced already like he should have.
__________________
sig by BoneKrusher
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 08:38 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
All-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,265
Reputation: 21160
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy
I feel kinda dumb for going against HawkeyeFan now stating that it would be dumb for the Rams to address their TE position when they spent two first day picks on TEs this past draft.
|
Haha the second I saw this post I remembered him wanting McMichael and I doubted it happening too... Go figure.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 PM.
|