Question from a Jets fan... - Page 2

ds8582 · 03-20-2007, 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by princefielder28

If Olsen and Lynch are gone the Packers should trade down; easy as that

I heard a rumor that the Pats and Packers were trying to swap picks. The Pats 2 1st rounders for the 16th pick. I think Joe Arrigo reported that. Did anyone else see that? It was maybe a week ago.

princefielder28 · 03-20-2007, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ds8582

I heard a rumor that the Pats and Packers were trying to swap picks. The Pats 2 1st rounders for the 16th pick. I think Joe Arrigo reported that. Did anyone else see that? It was maybe a week ago.

I would welcome that deal 100%! :)

packer_pat_4 · 03-20-2007, 11:35 AM

If Lynch, Peterson, and Landry are gone then I think the Pack target Olsen, Nelson, Hall in that order. If all these players are gone I think Griffin or Houston. This is all of course not including trades, which is too hard to predict.

princefielder28 · 03-20-2007, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packer_pat_4

If Lynch, Peterson, and Landry are gone then I think the Pack target Olsen, Nelson, Hall in that order. If all these players are gone I think Griffin or Houston. This is all of course not including trades, which is too hard to predict.

The 1st 3 in my opinion will be gone by the time the Packers pick and the only player from that 2nd bunch that they take with pick 16 would be Greg Olsen otherwise they trade down for more picks and take someone of more value to them.

M1Koter · 03-20-2007, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packer_pat_4

If Lynch, Peterson, and Landry are gone then I think the Pack target Olsen, Nelson, Hall in that order. If all these players are gone I think Griffin or Houston. This is all of course not including trades, which is too hard to predict.

I think Nelson is more deserving of the 16th pick than olson is

princefielder28 · 03-20-2007, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by M1Koter

I think Nelson is more deserving of the 16th pick than olson is

Not based on what's available and what we need more

NAVY · 03-21-2007, 03:02 AM

I don't think TE is the way to go in the first. Lets not forget that TT's philosophy is to draft BPA not highest player available to fit a current need.

I say it will be an OL, DL, or DB. Thats only if Buffalo drafts Lynch though.

jackalope · 03-21-2007, 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NAVY

I don't think TE is the way to go in the first. Lets not forget that TT's philosophy is to draft BPA not highest player available to fit a current need.

I say it will be an OL, DL, or DB. Thats only if Buffalo drafts Lynch though.

OL? that would be a terrible pick.

princefielder28 · 03-21-2007, 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jackalope

OL? that would be a terrible pick.

Unbelieveably terrible!!!