Trade Talk - Page 3

Nalej · 09-06-2010, 02:22 PM

Mark Clayton sent to the Rams by Baltimore

ESPN

KCJ58 · 09-06-2010, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nalej

Mark Clayton sent to the Rams by Baltimore

ESPN

O really I wonder what for

A Perfect Score · 09-06-2010, 02:53 PM

Early word is a late rounder. I wouldn't imagine anything higher then a 6th or 7th.

Splat · 09-07-2010, 08:37 AM

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...esworth-trade/

Quote:

ESPN's Chris Mortensen reports that the Titans and Redskins have again engaged in trade talk regarding Haynesworth. There is no deal as of yet. Mort says the Redskins asking price of two draft picks remains too high.

thenewfeature06 · 09-07-2010, 10:27 AM

I wouldn't mind Al getting shipped to OAK... yet he could be a problem.. if we stick to that 4-3 him and Henderson would be pretty tough to handle.

Splat · 09-07-2010, 10:32 AM

I think the last thing the Raiders need is an unmotivated player with a huge deal.

Halsey · 09-07-2010, 10:34 AM

Wow, the Titans won't even give up 2 Draft picks for Haynesworth... The guy is a slug when not playing for a contract.

bigbluedefense · 09-07-2010, 10:37 AM

Haynesworth is going to be a bargain for whoever takes him. He won't cost much in terms of compensation, and he won't be owed much either.

I think he's a horrible person, and I can't stand the guy, but I think in the right environment he can be dominant again.

thenewfeature06 · 09-07-2010, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splat

I think the last thing the Raiders need is an unmotivated player with a huge deal.

Eh.. I mean I understand you logic but a change of scenery and scheme could change things. I would say he is frustrated rather than unmotivated but like I said, I wouldn't push hard for him if I was Al but Id give up a 4th and a 7th...

LonghornsLegend · 09-07-2010, 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thenewfeature06

I wouldn't mind Al getting shipped to OAK... yet he could be a problem.. if we stick to that 4-3 him and Henderson would be pretty tough to handle.

Yea, because Oakland is the perfect situation for a player like Al to be motivated to work hard lmao. I can't believe you'd even want to bother. He takes a ton of plays off, doesn't work hard when he's not in a contract season, and nearly every decent player that goes to Oakland quits on the team anyway, yet you want to trade away more picks(already missing that 1st rounder) for that? Makes absolutely no sense.

A change of environment may do him some good, but that scenery wouldn't be Oakland.

Nalej · 09-07-2010, 11:01 AM

BB... get him to NE! Have Wilfork tell him to shut the **** up and he can play DE since he doesn't want to play the NT position

Jvig43 · 09-07-2010, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nalej

BB... get him to NE! Have Wilfork tell him to shut the **** up and he can play DE since he doesn't want to play the NT position

OMG I would die, but this will never happen. Plus we still have people to sign.

thenewfeature06 · 09-07-2010, 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LonghornsLegend

Yea, because Oakland is the perfect situation for a player like Al to be motivated to work hard lmao. I can't believe you'd even want to bother. He takes a ton of plays off, doesn't work hard when he's not in a contract season, and nearly every decent player that goes to Oakland quits on the team anyway, yet you want to trade away more picks(already missing that 1st rounder) for that? Makes absolutely no sense.

A change of environment may do him some good, but that scenery wouldn't be Oakland.

I mean run defense could be shaky so hey its a risk. High risk could be high reward but that doesn't always pay off. We brought in some high character guys in Campbell and McClain and got rid that whale Jamarcus but it makes some sense considering our D line has been garbage for awile now.

bigbluedefense · 09-07-2010, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thenewfeature06

I mean run defense could be shaky so hey its a risk. High risk could be high reward but that doesn't always pay off. We brought in some high character guys in Campbell and McClain and got rid that whale Jamarcus but it makes some sense considering our D line has been garbage for awile now.

Aren't you set at DT with Houston and Seymour?

I figure you'd need a DE or two more than a DT.

M.O.T.H. · 09-07-2010, 11:17 AM

Houston is starting at End. Their DTs are Kelly and Seymour.

thenewfeature06 · 09-07-2010, 11:20 AM

I think Houston will be playing DE and DT but Seymour will be doing the same. On our site it has Houston at DE and Seymour at DT.. Henderson is getting a little older now and Tommy Kelly should be shipped though who knows if anybody wants him.

SeanTaylorRIP · 09-07-2010, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigbluedefense

Haynesworth is going to be a bargain for whoever takes him. He won't cost much in terms of compensation, and he won't be owed much either.

I think he's a horrible person, and I can't stand the guy, but I think in the right environment he can be dominant again.

Yup I know for a fact he will be dominant again once he is traded, sucks that he will never be good for the Skins. I blame Shanny slightly for stooping to Haynesworth's level, but Fat Albert is the biggest dck bag I've ever seen and I'll gladly trade him even if it means we are a 5 win team this year. I can't believe this POS after skipping training camp comes out at says, " I actually don't mind playing the 34", and it took you all that time to figure that out. Also who the fck over a year in advance already says that he's skipping training camp next year as well. He's so damn selfish and while I know the Skins are a horribly run franchise even we don't deserve the crap Haynesworth gives us. I'd be pissed though if by trading Albert we can't at least pick up a receiver that can start over Joey Galloway. I'd take a Nate Burleson for him. Hell would have traded him to Baltimore for like a 4th rounder and Mark Clayton, although a D-line with Ngata and Albert just wouldn't be fair to the rest of the league.

21ST · 09-07-2010, 02:30 PM

Tenn wants him back but they arent willing to give up enough, he is not goin anywhere for the thousandth time

DoughBoy · 09-07-2010, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 21ST

Tenn wants him back but they arent willing to give up enough, he is not goin anywhere for the thousandth time

I'm taking bets!

For real though, Jeff and Mike haven't shut down the possibility like they did around draft time. I think this has a better chance of happening than you think 21st ( atleast I hope so). :)

A Perfect Score · 09-07-2010, 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeanTaylorRIP

Yup I know for a fact he will be dominant again once he is traded, sucks that he will never be good for the Skins. I blame Shanny slightly for stooping to Haynesworth's level, but Fat Albert is the biggest dck bag I've ever seen and I'll gladly trade him even if it means we are a 5 win team this year. I can't believe this POS after skipping training camp comes out at says, " I actually don't mind playing the 34", and it took you all that time to figure that out. Also who the fck over a year in advance already says that he's skipping training camp next year as well. He's so damn selfish and while I know the Skins are a horribly run franchise even we don't deserve the crap Haynesworth gives us. I'd be pissed though if by trading Albert we can't at least pick up a receiver that can start over Joey Galloway. I'd take a Nate Burleson for him. Hell would have traded him to Baltimore for like a 4th rounder and Mark Clayton, although a D-line with Ngata and Albert just wouldn't be fair to the rest of the league.

Ngata, Haynesworth and Cody would be the most dominant D-Line ever. I want it.

CC.SD · 09-07-2010, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A Perfect Score

Ngata, Haynesworth and Cody would be the most dominant D-Line ever. I want it.

not even close APS

21ST · 09-07-2010, 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DoughBoy

I'm taking bets!

For real though, Jeff and Mike haven't shut down the possibility like they did around draft time. I think this has a better chance of happening than you think 21st ( atleast I hope so). :)

So what 2 picks do u think it would happen for

TitanHope · 09-07-2010, 05:35 PM

Wasn't Mort the one pimping Haynesworth back to the Titans along with LaCanfora around draft time? Or was it just LaCanfora?

Ugh, I dunno. Shanny and Fish have great respect for one another. There's no doubt Shanny has told Fisher all the stuff Haynesworth has done. Just depends on if Fisher thinks bringing him back to TN would simmer down Fat Al.

As a fan, I totally wish they'd fork over two midround picks for him. But it's the Redskins wanting to send him off. Not the Titans wanting to get him back (I imagine it's something like a 4th this year and a future 3rd, or a 3rd and a 5th like Jenkins and Stroud were dealt for). The Titans have already invested two 2nd RD picks on the position as a means to replace Haynesworth, so they'll then be investing even more picks by bringing him back and reserving Jason Jones and Sen'Derrick Marks to backup/rotation players. So considering all that, I don't expect a deal to get done soon. And if it does, it certainly won't be on Washington's terms.

Safe bet is to assume nothing gets done. Hope I'm wrong though! I'd love for the DL to become our brean 'n butter again.

Halsey · 09-07-2010, 05:40 PM

Haynesworth must know exactly what he can and can't get away with to avoid giving Washington cause to file a grievance against him. They are probably praying he does something that they can use as a reason to get some of the money they paid him back. I gotta admit, Fat Al is pretty smart to have played so many people like a fiddle. He got his money and now he's getting away with being a bum. Hilarious.

21ST · 09-07-2010, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TitanHope

Wasn't Mort the one pimping Haynesworth back to the Titans along with LaCanfora around draft time? Or was it just LaCanfora?

Ugh, I dunno. Shanny and Fish have great respect for one another. There's no doubt Shanny has told Fisher all the stuff Haynesworth has done. Just depends on if Fisher thinks bringing him back to TN would simmer down Fat Al.

As a fan, I totally wish they'd fork over two midround picks for him. But it's the Redskins wanting to send him off. Not the Titans wanting to get him back (I imagine it's something like a 4th this year and a future 3rd, or a 3rd and a 5th like Jenkins and Stroud were dealt for). The Titans have already invested two 2nd RD picks on the position as a means to replace Haynesworth, so they'll then be investing even more picks by bringing him back and reserving Jason Jones and Sen'Derrick Marks to backup/rotation players. So considering all that, I don't expect a deal to get done soon. And if it does, it certainly won't be on Washington's terms.

Safe bet is to assume nothing gets done. Hope I'm wrong though! I'd love for the DL to become our brean 'n butter again.

It is the titants wanting Haynesworth not the other way around