Salary Cap? Money well spent, or wasted?

[ShyneQuasiOG22]

There's valid arguments in favor of and against a salary cap/floor. Only way to find out if the cap really does create parity is to go on without it, and only time will tell if that's really going to happen. The Redskins outspend everyone almost annually, and it doesn't seem to work out well for them. Creating a championship team is about a lot more then just spending money on talent and I think the league would do just fine without a cap, unless players demands and holdouts get completely out of control.

[njx9]

i think i'd be more intrigued if either side gave a **** about the actual game on the field, instead of just how that was going to get them more money (i don't blame them for thinking that way, i just wish they didn't). i think there are a number of things they could do to alter the parity in the league for the better, but i think it would generally end with some folks making less money than they probably think they should be making.

[RagingColt]

Originally Posted by killxswitch

I hate the Pats but they definitely were a dynasty.

Agree, they won the games, the big games in a 4 year time period to qualify as a true dynasty.

[descendency]

When you appear in 5 AFC or NFC title games in your decade (and 6 within 9 years), you are most definitely a dynasty.

[J-Mike88]

Originally Posted by descendency

When you appear in 5 AFC or NFC title games in your decade (and 6 within 9 years), you are most definitely a dynasty.

That's the Donovan McNabb Eagles then. Dynasty?

People throw that word around way too loosely these days.

[Splat]

D-y-n-a-s-t-y.

[J-Mike88]

Originally Posted by Splat

D-y-n-a-s-t-y.

Even if.....


........that chapter has ended.