Ryan Tannehill, QB, Texas A&M - Page 3

onejayhawk · 02-15-2012, 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by no bare feet

Due to his upside I do not see how he last past the Seahawks.

FIFY.

I would agree with this. He might go as high as the Redskins.

J

San Diego Chicken · 02-15-2012, 04:10 PM

Looks good. He understands how to throw the receiver open which is really impressive for a guy that lacks experience. Maybe playing WR helped him in that regard? Has the courage & confidence to hit those intermediate routes. He improvises pretty well too. I'm impressed by him, not sure who my #2 QB is between him and RGIII at this point.

FUNBUNCHER · 02-15-2012, 04:44 PM

Tannehill really needed another year in college, if not two. But his eligibility is all used up.

duesouth · 02-16-2012, 03:06 AM

Interesting debate from two NFL Draft Scout analysts on Tannehill...

onejayhawk · 02-16-2012, 06:21 PM

Saw this, but I dont buy it. Tannehill will interview, and there is enough tape to get his physical stuff. The thing that the teams have to decide is how much he can be taught, and workouts will not show that. What playing in the Senior Bowl would ahve done is allow people to see him adjust in real time. Weeden excelled at it, which is why he is now top 50, maybe top 30, in spite of his age.

J

SolidGold · 02-21-2012, 07:14 AM

Looks like Tannehill is out of the boot and planning his pro day for late march -

http://rob-rang.blogs.cbssports.com/...82485/34850817

Finsfan79 · 02-21-2012, 10:09 AM

Sherman a few days ago made some comments about Tannehill about how great he has the potential to be and will fit great into the WCO.

SolidGold · 02-24-2012, 01:06 PM

Dane Brugler ‏ @dpbrugler

* Reply
* RetweetedRetweet
* Delete
* FavoritedFavorite
* · Close Open Details

Also on Tannehill - he had to deal with an astonishing 64 drops this year #NFLCombine

Came across this when following twitter feeds at the combine.

Babylon · 02-24-2012, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Finsfan79

Sherman a few days ago made some comments about Tannehill about how great he has the potential to be and will fit great into the WCO.

Seattle sounds interested but might have to trade up in front of Miami. Not sure Pete Carroll and co. are capable of pulling that off.

Vaylor · 02-24-2012, 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SolidGold

Dane Brugler ‏ @dpbrugler

* Reply
* RetweetedRetweet
* Delete
* FavoritedFavorite
* · Close Open Details

Also on Tannehill - he had to deal with an astonishing 64 drops this year #NFLCombine

Came across this when following twitter feeds at the combine.

WTF seriously?

Caulibflower · 02-24-2012, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vaylor

WTF seriously?

Yep. The Tannehill guys on here keep pointing out that his W/L ratio had a lot more to do with his teammates than with him.

Caulibflower · 02-24-2012, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babylon

Seattle sounds interested but might have to trade up in front of Miami. Not sure Pete Carroll and co. are capable of pulling that off.

I don't think it's any sure thing that Miami goes quarterback. He played about like Alex Smith last year, and the 49ers aren't looking for a QB. But SF is a much stronger team; it would make sense for Miami to keep building up the rest of their positions when they've already got a pretty decent player.

Babylon · 02-24-2012, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caulibflower

I don't think it's any sure thing that Miami goes quarterback. He played about like Alex Smith last year, and the 49ers aren't looking for a QB. But SF is a much stronger team; it would make sense for Miami to keep building up the rest of their positions when they've already got a pretty decent player.

I would tend to agree with your thinking but i seem to remember another guy who went 8th last year who was up and down, good skill set, receivers dropped a ton of balls. Name slips my mind.

SchizophrenicBatman · 02-24-2012, 06:45 PM

SMALL HANDS

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_F9zc-ffq3w

Caulibflower · 02-24-2012, 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babylon

I would tend to agree with your thinking but i seem to remember another guy who went 8th last year who was up and down, good skill set, receivers dropped a ton of balls. Name slips my mind.

I know you're defensive about Locker. ;-) But I liked him last year. Didn't consider him a reach. I do like Tannehill a little better than Locker, though.

gpngc · 02-24-2012, 07:38 PM

I'm pretty confident Tannehill will go somewhere between 6-12. Seahawks GM John Schneider mentioned him twice in interviews yesterday.

Brent · 02-24-2012, 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caulibflower

Yep. The Tannehill guys on here keep pointing out that his W/L ratio had a lot more to do with his teammates than with him.

As probably the only person on this board to have seen all the Aggie games the past 3-6 years (because I am an A&M alum), I can assure you that the offense talent wasn't the biggest problem, they lost because of the worst coaching you'll ever see.

OSUGiants17 · 02-24-2012, 08:07 PM

Don't know if this has been mentioned yet(just found this thread), but I wish people would stop calling him Tannyhill or Tannenhill when they type his names in mock draft.

J-Mike88 · 02-27-2012, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brent

As probably the only person on this board to have seen all the Aggie games the past 3-6 years (because I am an A&M alum), I can assure you that the offense talent wasn't the biggest problem, they lost because of the worst coaching you'll ever see.

And now he's the guy going to fix the offense in Tampa Bay now.

onejayhawk · 02-27-2012, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J-Mike88

And now he's the guy going to fix the offense in Tampa Bay now.

Spare me.

At least Josh Freeman is a similar build to Tannehill, so he wont be completely lost.

J

Al Capwn · 02-27-2012, 12:09 PM

I would like to know more about Tannehill. I know early into the season I sort of worte him off as a Gabbert clone, and never really continued to follow him through the season. Anyone have an opinion on him? I think if the Rams really want to get cute with trade talks and Tannehill is a viable option, the Browns could easily have him at #4. Than get a guy like Nick Perry at #22 and get a stud WR Wright, Quick, or Hill from Ga Tech in the 2nd. I think that would go a long way to fixing this team. Then in the 3rd we could get a nice RB since Hillis/Hardesty/Brand Jackson is pretty much a joke at the position and hard to count on. I personally really like LeMichael James and think he'd be an awesome pick in the 3rd round. Real explosive playmaker who would be nice to compliment Hillis, 3rd down back and when Hillis starts QQing or gets injured (as he often does) he can step in and pwn. Then we can tell Hillis to go QQ somewhere else and get another RB in next years draft.

As of right now I think that would be an awesome scenario.