Redskins to Get RG3 - Page 2

Juice24 · 03-09-2012, 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by holt_bruce81

Worst scenerio for Rams....

1. Luck
2. RG3
3. Kalil
4. Blackmon
5. Claiborne

Who would the Rams take? Trent? Floyd?

Hopefully neither, Its too high for a RB and Floyds not worth the 6th pick. Poe or Cox to STL.

holt_bruce81 · 03-09-2012, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juice24

Hopefully neither, Its too high for a RB and Floyds not worth the 6th pick. Poe or Cox to STL.

Poe or Cox. Excuse me while I puke.

descendency · 03-09-2012, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juice24

Hopefully neither, Its too high for a RB and Floyds not worth the 6th pick. Poe or Cox to STL.

I'm going to love it after the season and people realize that Floyd is the best WR in this class.

They could easily trade back again (on draft day) for a team that wants Tannehill and pick up more picks.

holt_bruce81 · 03-09-2012, 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by descendency

I'm going to love it after the season and people realize that Floyd is the best WR in this class.

They could easily trade back again (on draft day) for a team that wants Tannehill and pick up more picks.

Yeah that's what I'm thinking. Maybe Seattle.

keylime_5 · 03-09-2012, 10:38 PM

see, now there is no way I would trade 3 firsts and a 2nd to move up two spots if I'm the Browns. Let the Redskins have that. We can go out and get Matt Flynn and keep those picks and we're probably better off as a team. We have so many holes that we would've been set back a couple years if we made that trade. It would've been nice to get RGIII, but now we have to either go all out for Flynn, or get Tannehill/Weeden. At least we know before FA starts what we have to do.

holt_bruce81 · 03-09-2012, 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keylime_5

see, now there is no way I would trade 3 firsts and a 2nd to move up two spots if I'm the Browns. Let the Redskins have that. We can go out and get Matt Flynn and keep those picks and we're probably better off as a team. We have so many holes that we would've been set back a couple years if we made that trade. It would've been nice to get RGIII, but now we have to either go all out for Flynn, or get Tannehill/Weeden. At least we know before FA starts what we have to do.

Two 1st rounders and a 2nd.

Juice24 · 03-09-2012, 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by holt_bruce81

Poe or Cox. Excuse me while I puke.

Im not saying he wont be good, hes just not worth a top ten pick.

keylime_5 · 03-09-2012, 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by holt_bruce81

Two 1st rounders and a 2nd.

sorry, but they traded 3 first rounders and a 2nd rounder for Griffin. They only gave up two extra first rounders and a 2nd to move up 4 spots - but they still paid the price of 3 firsts and a 2nd overall to get their franchise QB. They better pray that he turns out to be a good one.

On the flipside, if the Browns sign Flynn and he turns out to be a top 10 or top 15 QB then they'll come out of this looking good. It might turn out bad though if they don't get a good QB this year.

descendency · 03-09-2012, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keylime_5

see, now there is no way I would trade 3 firsts and a 2nd to move up two spots if I'm the Browns. Let the Redskins have that. We can go out and get Matt Flynn and keep those picks and we're probably better off as a team. We have so many holes that we would've been set back a couple years if we made that trade. It would've been nice to get RGIII, but now we have to either go all out for Flynn, or get Tannehill/Weeden. At least we know before FA starts what we have to do.

If Flynn signs with Miami and Manning in Den/KC, then what?

That's basically what Washington was thinking about.

holt_bruce81 · 03-09-2012, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juice24

Im not saying he wont be good, hes just not worth a top ten pick.

Floyd is worth a top 10 pick more than Cox or Poe are.

Complex · 03-09-2012, 11:02 PM

Quote:

The Cleveland Browns had stepped up their efforts to try to acquire the No. 2 pick in recent days, going so far as to offer at least three No. 1 picks to the Rams and possibly even the second-round pick, according to one source familiar with the deal. Cleveland sensed it was going to get the deal done, only to be informed that St. Louis planned to deal the coveted No. 2 pick to the Redskins.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/76...-st-louis-rams

descendency · 03-09-2012, 11:08 PM

Schefter had a tweet saying "numerous teams" offered in the same neighborhood as the Redskins for RG3.

Too lazy to get it, but that makes the Skins look less insane.

holt_bruce81 · 03-09-2012, 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by descendency

Schefter had a tweet saying "numerous teams" offered in the same neighborhood as the Redskins for RG3.

Too lazy to get it, but that makes the Skins look less insane.

Interesting that the Rams decided to keep RG3 in the NFC. They really had to think Washington was the less talented of the teams.

keylime_5 · 03-09-2012, 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Complex

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/76...-st-louis-rams

i heard that's false. the browns didn't offer that much. obviously the redskins had the biggest offer.

zachsaints52 · 03-09-2012, 11:19 PM

If the Browns offered 3 1sts the Rams woulda jumped at it, knowing those 1sts are 150% more likely to be worse then the Redskins picks.

Complex · 03-09-2012, 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zachsaints52

If the Browns offered 3 1sts the Rams woulda jumped at it, knowing those 1sts are 150% more likely to be worse then the Redskins picks.

Unless they offered both of their 1st round picks this years and a 1st next year. Their 2nd 1st is like the 24th pick or w.e.

zachsaints52 · 03-09-2012, 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Complex

Unless they offered both of their 1st round picks this years and a 1st next year. Their 2nd 1st is like the 24th pick or w.e.

I would take #4, # 22, and their Top 5 next year rather then #6 and two non Top-10s

STsACE · 03-09-2012, 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by holt_bruce81

Two 1st rounders and a 2nd.

I'm gonna find the article, but Schefter reported the Rams viewed our #4 and #22 as only 1 1st round pick. If true, than the Rams wanted 3 1st rounders in addition to swapping #4 for #2.

RaiderNation · 03-09-2012, 11:45 PM

I'm glad I don't have to see RG3 be ruined in a Browns jersey

Abaddon · 03-10-2012, 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by holt_bruce81

Worst scenerio for Rams....

1. Luck
2. RG3
3. Kalil
4. Blackmon
5. Claiborne

Who would the Rams take? Trent? Floyd?

Rieff imo

Trading back makes a lot of sense, too. But they have to get a tackle.

PossumBoy9 · 03-10-2012, 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diabsoule

Richardson or Cox, IMO

I like both those guys more than Blackmon.

RaiderNation · 03-10-2012, 12:23 AM

I think Cleveland goes Richardson at 4, Tannehill or Wright at 21.

Matthew Jones · 03-10-2012, 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RaiderNation

I think Cleveland goes Richardson at 4, Tannehill or Wright at 21.

Tannehill will not make it to 21.

RaiderNation · 03-10-2012, 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matthew Jones

Tannehill will not make it to 21.

I'm assuming they move up from 21 to get Tannehill if they want him, I should of said that. I think where Flynn goes will determine what team drafts Tannehill. Flynn will likely go to Miami/Cleveland with Tannehill going to the loser.

Matthew Jones · 03-10-2012, 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RaiderNation

I'm assuming they move up from 21 to get Tannehill if they want him, I should of said that. I think where Flynn goes will determine what team drafts Tannehill. Flynn will likely go to Miami/Cleveland with Tannehill going to the loser.

I'm thinking Tannehill should go #8 and the Browns sign Flynn, but what about Seattle as a possible suitor for Flynn? That would be an interesting possibility as well.