Weedon Now in Round 1?

[onejayhawk]

Originally Posted by Shane P. Hallam

Pretty sure RGIII would be a consensus #2 still, but this would be a pointless debate, lol.

Maybe. I think it would be non obvious. The styles are very different, so it is hard to tell.

Then we would have 4 QBs in the first 8 picks.

J

[descendency]

Originally Posted by Bengalsrocket

Being 29 years old doesn't bother me (if Luck was 29 years old, I would still draft him 1st overall). However, the idea that he's some how more advanced than the younger guys because of his age does bother me. It's not like his extra 6-8 years of life on this earth somehow made him a better college QB than these other guys, so I don't understand how it will make him a better NFL player.

The human body's physical peak (normally) is around 28 or 29.

Originally Posted by bitonti

agree 100%. And some team will take him too high and push him into the role anyway. by the end of the year, I believe the Eagles were starting Watkins.

And he was borderline awful at times.

[ChiFan24]

Originally Posted by onejayhawk

When was Weeden anywhere but round 1?



If he was 22-23 we would be arguing who was going first after Luck. We might be arguing if Luck was going first.

J

I'm sorry, but that is ******* absurd. Are there 2 different Brandon Weedens or something?

[Babylon]

Originally Posted by ChiFan24

I'm sorry, but that is ******* absurd. Are there 2 different Brandon Weedens or something?

I'm surprised it's been this difficult for people to figure it out.

[A Perfect Score]

I'll take Kirk Cousins in Round 1 before I take Brandon Weeden. I think it's as likely, too.

[IrishBrowns]

Originally Posted by Grizzlegom

I still maintain that Weeden would be a top ten pick if he was 22-23. I think he's a realistic possibility for the Browns at 22 and he's my been number 3 QB in this draft all along.

yeah but he's not 22-23 years old...he's lived life for 6 more years