|
|
| 2013 NFL Draft Forum Discuss the 2013 NFL Draft |
04-25-2012, 04:01 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 13,293
Reputation: 228420
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gpngc
I think he may be projecting that TB leapfrogs CLE to draft TRich at No. 3. Vikings move down to No. 5 and still get Kalil. CLE is stuck with Blackmon.
Because mocking CLE to pass on TRich for Justin Blackmon does not make any sense otherwise.
|
I think you are probably right, that was my thinking as well. Mayock has always been intent that Cleveland should and will draft Richardson if he falls to #4 - so either he has new intel or he is predicting the Bucs to grab TRich at 3.
That said, I would be a little surprised personally if Cleveland didn't pick Claiborne over Blackmon if Richardson goes #3. I would be very happy with Blackmon though.
Everyone and their mother thinks the Pats are gonna take Harrison Smith if they don't trade their pick. Makes too much sense.
__________________
|
|
|
|   Sponsored Advertisement |
|   Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
04-25-2012, 04:06 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Head Moderator
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Florida
Posts: 30,174
Reputation: 777217
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by slats7
That's the first time I've seen Barron projected higher than 14.
|
Schefter tweeted today that Barron will not make it to #14.
__________________
THANK YOU TREY.
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 04:12 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 538
Reputation: 26293
|
The Chiefs spending another high 1st on ANOTHER safety? I don't get it. Feels like a waste IMO. If they had to go DB with that pick it'd be better if they got a corner.
IDK. Barron at 11 seems like a bad idea, IMO, with Berry having the potential that he does and Kendrick Lewis showing some promise.
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 04:18 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,099
Reputation: 509034
|
not bad, but not anything different than any of us could really do
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 04:18 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 13,293
Reputation: 228420
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolidGold
How accurate has he been historically?
|
He's better than most. I remember in 2009 he nailed Glenn Dorsey going #5 with Matt Ryan going #3 before everyone else in his mock draft. He usually gets the top 5 or 6 picks dead on....but like everyone else knows it's a total crapshoot guessing how the draft will go after pick 10 or so.
So if he says Blackmon to CLE, Richardson to TB, Kalil to MIN, and Claiborne to STL people are turning their heads and not scoffing at it with good reason.
__________________
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 04:18 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Clinton, MO
Posts: 8
Reputation: 0
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaneMarko
The Chiefs spending another high 1st on ANOTHER safety? I don't get it. Feels like a waste IMO. If they had to go DB with that pick it'd be better if they got a corner.
IDK. Barron at 11 seems like a bad idea, IMO, with Berry having the potential that he does and Kendrick Lewis showing some promise.
|
But with the Chiefs playing in a division with both Rivers AND Manning now it wouldn't be such a bad idea.
Also, last season the Chiefs were in the Dime over 50% of the time and I can see that number increasing next season or staying the same...in that case you could play Berry, Lewis, and Barron at once.
I'd much rather us take Barron than Poe or DeCastro, etc.
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 04:19 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 13,293
Reputation: 228420
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by P-L
Schefter tweeted today that Barron will not make it to #14.
|
Been connected to Buffalo, Kansas City, and Seattle. They say Seattle wants to move Chancellor to OLB and put Barron at strong safety. I think Dallas, Philly, or New York will try to trade up and get him.
__________________
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 04:21 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,099
Reputation: 509034
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monomach
I'll probably get hated on, but...I still don't see Justin Blackmon as the best WR in this class. I definitely don't see him as a game-breaking top ten pick. Michael Floyd is my #1, and I don't think he should go top ten, either.
In fact, I like a lot of the projected third round WRs more than the guys who are supposed to go in the late first/early second.
Seriously...Justin Blackmon as the #4 pick?
This year is just weird.
|
I think Blackmon is the #1 in the class, but I think he's more of a 10-15 range pick. I don't see Blackmon as anywhere near Dez Bryant as a prospect.
Blackmon is alot slower and smaller than people realize, he reminds me a lot of Crabtree. Huge career in the Big 12, but smaller than anticipated and not great speed
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 04:22 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
SWDC Mafia
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: You can call me Jooby Guverse
Posts: 23,985
Reputation: 5891600
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerm
But with the Chiefs playing in a division with both Rivers AND Manning now it wouldn't be such a bad idea.
Also, last season the Chiefs were in the Dime over 50% of the time and I can see that number increasing next season or staying the same...in that case you could play Berry, Lewis, and Barron at once.
I'd much rather us take Barron than Poe or DeCastro, etc.
|
I'd rather take almost anyone else over Barron. I fully agree that S is a need, but we're talking a 3rd-5th round need. We need someone who can develop and play in a sub type of role, not a starter. Using a pick that high on a position of strength is a waste.
Quote:
Originally Posted by keylime_5
Been connected to Buffalo, Kansas City, and Seattle. They say Seattle wants to move Chancellor to OLB and put Barron at strong safety. I think Dallas, Philly, or New York will try to trade up and get him.
|
Woah, don't get ahead of yourself. The only time Barron has been connected to KC is in his mock. It isn't like this is a widely held belief from some inside source anywhere.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caddy
I want to be Vidae.
|
Quote:
<@vidae> Bomer is like an angel
<@DG> angels wish
|
Quote:
<@vidae> D:
<@comahan> D:
|
** RIP themaninblack. You will be missed. **
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 04:27 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Clinton, MO
Posts: 8
Reputation: 0
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vidae
I'd rather take almost anyone else over Barron. I fully agree that S is a need, but we're talking a 3rd-5th round need. We need someone who can develop and play in a sub type of role, not a starter. Using a pick that high on a position of strength is a waste.
|
But outside of NT and maybe ILB is there any position of weakness where we could draft someone that comes in and instantly starts?
I want no part of Poe and I think both Kuechly and Cox are off the board at #11 so it puts us in a precarious position.
My mindset with the draft is different than others...I hate passing up on playmakers and possibly game changing players even if it's at a position of need.
If Barron drops to #11 maybe you trade back with a Dallas and then take Hightower.
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 04:30 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 784
Reputation: 108001
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PACKmanN
usually when you have a safety roam the field, the other stays back in coverage and keeps the deep option out. You cannot have barron play in-the-box and have berry run around. it would weaken your pass defense.
|
what in the hell are you talking about
__________________
Currently on IR: Rip 2011 Jamaal Charles :(
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 04:36 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,099
Reputation: 509034
|
The truth is, if KC really wants to draft Barron, they can make it work.
For example, Barron can start at SS and Berry FS. Berry is talented enough to play one on one against pretty much anyone unless its an elite WR. They could bring in Lewis to play.
Would it be ideal? Probably not, but if they think there's less risk of Barron busting than others, why not?
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 04:43 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 13,293
Reputation: 228420
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vidae
I'd rather take almost anyone else over Barron. I fully agree that S is a need, but we're talking a 3rd-5th round need. We need someone who can develop and play in a sub type of role, not a starter. Using a pick that high on a position of strength is a waste.
Woah, don't get ahead of yourself. The only time Barron has been connected to KC is in his mock. It isn't like this is a widely held belief from some inside source anywhere.
|
I heard that the Chiefs were considering Barron before this mock came out. But regardless he has been tied to the Chiefs pick even if this mock is the only source doing so. Mayock is a helluva source anyways.
I never said the Chiefs would take him either, I just think that it's extremely likely that he goes between picks 10 and 12 based on everything coming out recently.
__________________
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 04:50 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 13,293
Reputation: 228420
|
Pete Prisco apparently has a lot of the same ideas at Mayock. Not sure if coincidence or if they know something we don't.
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/f...aft-PetePrisco
__________________
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 05:27 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sun rises in the East
Posts: 2,446
Reputation: 288039
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gpngc
I think he may be projecting that TB leapfrogs CLE to draft TRich at No. 3. Vikings move down to No. 5 and still get Kalil. CLE is stuck with Blackmon.
Because mocking CLE to pass on TRich for Justin Blackmon does not make any sense otherwise.
|
Bucs were the worst team in the league by seasons end. How can they justify giving up picks to take a top 5 RB?...while already having a pretty good power back and the league moving further toward a passing trend? Butch Davis making decisions behind the scenes or what?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by borg9
Are you not entertained? Is this not why you are here?
|
______________________________________________
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 05:32 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,099
Reputation: 509034
|
The Bucs have their QB, WR and two complimentary WR's, TE, LT, RG, C, LG.
They have some talent at DT if they stay healthy.
They should be much improved this season
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 05:34 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: "I eat quarterbacks." - B.I.
Posts: 9,042
Reputation: 894315
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brown Leader
Bucs were the worst team in the league by seasons end. How can they justify giving up picks to take a top 5 RB?...while already having a pretty good power back and the league moving further toward a passing trend? Butch Davis making decisions behind the scenes or what?
|
You're right. They simply cannot afford to lose the 3rd round pick it would require to get the highest impact player in the entire draft at a position of GREAT need (Blount cannot play the most important down in football, fumbles too much, and they have literally no one else on the roster).
That 3rd round pick is FAR too valuable. By staying put and adding a CB AND using that third round pick, which mathematically has a 90% chance to yield a pro bowler, the Bucs will be in MUCH better shape.
/draft picks are SEVERELY overvalued when discussing trades for prospects like Trent Richardson.
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 05:51 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: There's no place I can be since I found Serenity.
Posts: 19,252
Reputation: 1547812
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerm
But outside of NT and maybe ILB is there any position of weakness where we could draft someone that comes in and instantly starts?
|
DeCastro would instantly start. Lilja isn't a bad played by any means but he is far from great. I'm not saying they will take him but it's a high possibility.
That said outside of QB the Chiefs don't have any glaring needs, so they could do a number of different things with the pick.
__________________
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 05:56 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 17,796
Reputation: 1277265
|
Shea Mcclellin looks like this years version of Clay Matthews/Brooks Reed for Patriots fans. They'll be moaning again when he goes somewhere else.
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 06:06 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 971
Reputation: 1837010
|
If the Titans pick Stephen Hill with DeCastro and Poe on the board, I will stick a gun in my mouth and pull the trigger. **** that noise.
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 06:22 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 360
Reputation: 15119
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaneMarko
The Chiefs spending another high 1st on ANOTHER safety? I don't get it. Feels like a waste IMO.
|
Exactly. Pioli is smarter than that.
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 06:24 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 360
Reputation: 15119
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Alex
If the Titans pick Stephen Hill with DeCastro and Poe on the board, I will stick a gun in my mouth and pull the trigger. **** that noise.
|
Your signature picture is absolutely hilarious....my all time favorite wrestler and Yoda is my nick name....that is my desktop background from this day forward.
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 06:28 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,099
Reputation: 509034
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Alex
If the Titans pick Stephen Hill with DeCastro and Poe on the board, I will stick a gun in my mouth and pull the trigger. **** that noise.
|
I just can't see it happening, Hill is all potential at this point. He would be behind Britt, Washington, Williams and maybe even Hawkins right away
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 07:33 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 238
Reputation: 228
|
I personally think the Browns taking Trent Richardson at #4, then Stephen Hill at #22 would be a great thing for them.
__________________
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 07:56 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: R4L 3:16 says I just whipped your ass
Posts: 11,945
Reputation: 2227871
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gpngc
You're right. They simply cannot afford to lose the 3rd round pick it would require to get the highest impact player in the entire draft at a position of GREAT need (Blount cannot play the most important down in football, fumbles too much, and they have literally no one else on the roster).
That 3rd round pick is FAR too valuable. By staying put and adding a CB AND using that third round pick, which mathematically has a 90% chance to yield a pro bowler, the Bucs will be in MUCH better shape.
/draft picks are SEVERELY overvalued when discussing trades for prospects like Trent Richardson.
|
So much nut hugging for Richardson. The dude is good no doubt but he's good at a position that has lost a lot of value. I'd rather spend that 1st on something better and use the 3rd on a serviceable RB. Its been proven you can win with a RB by committee set up.
__________________
Props to BK for the sig
"Impulsive thinker, compulsive drinker, addict, half animal half man"
Quote:
Originally Posted by njx9
that's because we're the only animal capable of getting it from other animals. the day a goat can milk cows, it will.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:15 PM.
|