Yes, but sudden changes in play style are also quite suspicious.
I feel like you're just posting more because it's summer and you happen to be around right now.
This was my suspicion as well which is why I didn't vote. At this point, I'm actually most suspicious of Cain. He's been virtually non-existent, which seems odd for him.
Location: You would know about being more in tune if you were MORE IN TUNE
Posts: 21,303
Reputation: 3290403
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerBaron
Yes, but sudden changes in play style are also quite suspicious.
I feel like you're just posting more because it's summer and you happen to be around right now.
That's how I feel regarding CJ. I remember thinking his activity was oddly high in a recent game and he just ended up being a townie. I still think he needs to get over the power roles, considering he did well in that role.
plus I would assume it's always easier to post more as a good character because you have that to fall back on as a last resort defense of yourself
I'm not following you at all. First you vote no lynch, following CJ's suggestion. When vidae then says he's suspicious of CJ, you unvote and agree with vidae. Now that people are saying CJ's different activity level may not be sinisterly rooted, you're making a case in agreement.
obv this might not be the best decision but it's a safe one, we can kill broth because he is obv just a joke role
Why would the safe decision be to kill a very likely good guy rather than simply not lynching? Not sure if this is a gaffe resulting from dying day one every time, or something else.
Location: If we're gonna die, let's die looking like a Peruvian folk band.
Posts: 26,803
Reputation: 3059094
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cigaro
Why would the safe decision be to kill a very likely good guy rather than simply not lynching? Not sure if this is a gaffe resulting from dying day one every time, or something else.
because it's a useless good guy at best and at least we would learn something
those who are opposed may very well be evil and hoping to get a bigger threat
I'm not following you at all. First you vote no lynch, following CJ's suggestion. When vidae then says he's suspicious of CJ, you unvote and agree with vidae. Now that people are saying CJ's different activity level may not be sinisterly rooted, you're making a case in agreement.
That, and you're the chosen number eleven.
notice that I never voted for CJ... because I was never sold, maybe? I don't know the tendencies of anyone in these games since this is my fourth ever. given the explanations people have made for CJ, I thought they made sense, and so I backed off of my suspicion.
because it's a useless good guy at best and at least we would learn something
What do we learn from lynching broth that we wouldn't learn from a no lynch? We're already pretty certain broth is good, we're already suspicious of those who initially voted for him, what more does lynching him day one gain us?
notice that I never voted for CJ... because I was never sold, maybe? I don't know the tendencies of anyone in these games since this is my fourth ever. given the explanations people have made for CJ, I thought they made sense, and so I backed off of my suspicion.
I'm always suspicious of followers who jump around. It's only day one, and as you can see, I haven't voted for you either, but I still believe its odd behavior.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fenikz
those who are opposed may very well be evil and hoping to get a bigger threat
Vote: Cigaro
Or those who are opposed don't see the gain in lynching a pretty much known good guy when no lynch is an option. Day one's a crapshoot, but if no lynch is an option, there's no reason to lynch someone who's almost certainly good. You haven't provided any actual reason why lynching broth provides us with more info than lynching no one, which would unquestionably be the safe option you advocated for. Your logic has been pretty poor.
I'm always suspicious of followers who jump around. It's only day one, and as you can see, I haven't voted for you either, but I still believe its odd behavior.
Or those who are opposed don't see the gain in lynching a pretty much known good guy when no lynch is an option. Day one's a crapshoot, but if no lynch is an option, there's no reason to lynch someone who's almost certainly good. You haven't provided any actual reason why lynching broth provides us with more info than lynching no one, which would unquestionably be the safe option you advocated for. Your logic has been pretty poor.
Oh, I wasn't aware you knew the alignment of everyone playing. Who is "certainly good" right now Cigaro? And how did you come across this information? Were you told ahead of time?