First Mock in 3 Years.. - Page 2

Robcards · 03-07-2013, 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pat Sims 90

I don't see Ogletree in the 1st for the Bengals they have started to value character more with higher picks.

I know he wasn't an early pick but, them taking Orson Charles and also signing Burfict lead me to believe they wouldn't pass on Ogletree bc of his character

roidrunner · 03-07-2013, 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IrishBrowns

When are people going to put multiple QB's going in the first round? Is everyone waiting til Kiper, Mayock and everyone else end up slotting up more QB's in the first round? Because it's going to happen.

I did not do any trades for this mock. Most teams at the back end of the draft, are doing pretty well at the QB position. If i do have a trades mock, it will have more QBs taken

asham27 · 03-07-2013, 11:20 AM

I don't see how Moore falls all the way to the Ravens. If he does, I'm sure they'd be ecstatic.

roidrunner · 03-07-2013, 11:33 AM

His bad combine will make scouts go back to the tape. They will nitpick the guy and he is going to drop.

also welcome on the first post.

causticon · 03-07-2013, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mightytitan9

Cyprien is a FS and he's projected to go somewhere between 25 and 35

By whom? Also, the current Broncos FO drafted Rahim Moore, they aren't giving up on him yet. Sorry

roidrunner · 03-07-2013, 11:42 AM

what position makes more sense for the Broncos? I dont follow the Broncos much.

causticon · 03-07-2013, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roidrunner

what position makes more sense for the Broncos? I dont follow the Broncos much.

CB and DT are pretty obvious. RT has been speculated because the Broncos have mentioned moving Orlando Franklin to OG. I thought he played fine last year at RT though. MLB is an option, but Elway said via the Denver Post that Nate Irving and Stephen Johnson would slug it out.

Robcards · 03-07-2013, 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roidrunner

what position makes more sense for the Broncos? I dont follow the Broncos much.

DT and a DE, the only 2 guys on the front 4 that are solid are Dumervil and Wolfe. Wolfe is likely to kick inside to DT and so they'd need a LE and DT.

MLB is also an obvious need. CB as well. I say TE but everyone puts more stock in the multi-year deals given to Dreesen and Tamme than I do, I think they're definitely expendable.

causticon · 03-07-2013, 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robcards

DT and a DE, the only 2 guys on the front 4 that are solid are Dumervil and Wolfe. Wolfe is likely to kick inside to DT and so they'd need a LE and DT.

MLB is also an obvious need. CB as well. I say TE but everyone puts more stock in the multi-year deals given to Dreesen and Tamme than I do, I think they're definitely expendable.

JDR was extremely high on Jason Hunter last year at LDE, it will be interesting if they resign him. I can easily see the Broncos drafting a DE, but I'm not high on any at 28. Elway said in the Denver Post that TE was not a position of need, I put more into that than Tamme/Dreesen. The Broncos need a NT and figure out what to do with Wolfe.

roidrunner · 03-07-2013, 12:12 PM

im thinking about making the Broncos trade back in my next mock. I figure with their position in the draft (right before the patriots). They are a likely jump position for a team in the 2nd round to come up.

Robcards · 03-07-2013, 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by causticon

JDR was extremely high on Jason Hunter last year at LDE, it will be interesting if they resign him. I can easily see the Broncos drafting a DE, but I'm not high on any at 28. Elway said in the Denver Post that TE was not a position of need, I put more into that than Tamme/Dreesen. The Broncos need a NT and figure out what to do with Wolfe.

I put about zero stock in things front office people say, especially this time of year. Jets personnel were saying RT wasn't a position of need and Wayne Hunter was our starter up until August last year, for example.

Or how about the Browns organization telling McCoy and the media that they werent going to draft a QB and McCoy was the starter? lol

Robcards · 03-07-2013, 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roidrunner

im thinking about making the Broncos trade back in my next mock. I figure with their position in the draft (right before the patriots). They are a likely jump position for a team in the 2nd round to come up.

I have them taking Jonathan Hankins in my mock, he'd be a solid fit and should be there at 28.

causticon · 03-07-2013, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robcards

I put about zero stock in things front office people say, especially this time of year. Jets personnel were saying RT wasn't a position of need and Wayne Hunter was our starter up until August last year, for example.

Or how about the Browns organization telling McCoy and the media that they werent going to draft a QB and McCoy was the starter? lol

I'm sorry, I took offense of you comparing the Browns to any other organization

Robcards · 03-07-2013, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by causticon

I'm sorry, I took offense of you comparing the Browns to any other organization

Not really comparing any organization, just using examples to make my point that this is what they call 'lying season' for a reason. Everyone is going to talk up their own players, say they want to keep their players, say they don't need anything or anyone, etc etc. It's a game within the game.

There are a few exceptions like the Bills that play their hand face-up but for the most part everyone is full of it.